Steward requests/Checkuser
Appearance
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Iswjy1mcb (talk | contribs) at 02:47, 11 January 2019 (→A few time@zh.wikipedia ). It may differ significantly from the current version .
Checkuser icons | |
---|---|
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments. | |
{{Confirmed}}: Confirmed | {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed |
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely | {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to |
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible | {{Completed}}: Completed Completed |
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely | {{TakeNote}}: Note Note: |
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated | {{Doing}}: Doing... |
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive | {{StaleIP}}: Stale |
{{Declined}}: Declined | {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing |
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust | {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says |
{{Duck}}: It looks like a duck to me | {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball |
This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.
Before making a request:
- Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
- Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
- Make sure there are no local checkusers.
- Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:
How to make a request
|
---|
How to make a request:
|
Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests
Andyccr@zh.wikiversity
Status: In progress
- List of users
- Andyccr (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- AndyUSWCAX (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- AndyUSD (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: N.A. This isn't zhwiki.
- @Bbb23: as enwiki CU who conducted the check that this is a crosswiki issue. Possibly commons also, see SUL of accounts.--Cohaf (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC) [reply ]
- Well, even if it is not zhwiki, local discussion is always preferred since we are not expert on all the local projects and your fellow editors might be able to detect new CU target. Will do in few minutes after I am done with other stuff. — regards, Revi 12:43, 6 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- I duck blocked all and had discussed this case with community members offline so I think we did all we could here. The rest really require a CU to ensure all is taken care off. If there is a range, do feel free to do a checkuser block. Thanks.--Cohaf (talk) 13:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- I'm starting doubting if we live on the same planet. Is "a few minutes" that long? (Joke→) You don't live on Mercury, do you? --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 12:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
AryaHindu@hi.wikipedia
Status: In progress
- List of users
- AryaHindu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- देशी छोरा (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: local policy
Haled R@ro.wikipedia
Status: Not done
- List of users
- Haled R (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Gbarbu22 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Not done - no check needed here. That account hasn't edited in nearly a month, so checking it would not assist in preventing any abuse. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
Wikiobai@ro.wikipedia
Status: In progress
- List of users
- Wikiobai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- BAICAN_XXX (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Centurrion (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- ValydinDD (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Comment Anonymous Comment: Have you to look for further evidence? You should mean discussion here which has occured at appropiate section below: see Cross-wiki LTA vandal for understanding such situation. 86.126.100.159 16:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- I added the name of Centurrion, a new user with a very similar pattern of behavior. Some other sleepers or active accounts may also be found. --Pafsanias (talk) 23:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- ValydinDD added for the same reasons. Please see the complete (?) list of known sockpuppets of BAICAN XXX. --Pafsanias (talk) 13:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Pafsanias and Dan Mihai Pitea: Indeed for some purposes. Does really the accounts are related to BAICAN XXX? If they are same person, please provide additional consensus details as to convince stewards to assist check for others, otherwise this CU action wouldn't be so accurate for Community's privacy rule. 86.126.112.251 17:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Comment Anonymous Comment: Have you to look for further evidence? You should mean discussion here which has occured at appropiate section below: see Cross-wiki LTA vandal for understanding such situation. 86.126.100.159 16:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
MeritTim@zh.wikipedia
Status: In progress
- List of users
- MeritTim (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Responsibility330 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#MeritTim
MTR 558391@zh.wikipedia
Status: Not done
- List of users
- MTR 558391 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Shek Ming Fai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#MTR 553891
- Comment Comment. No local consensus to check, they have clear editorial disputes with the rest and send the 2 to zhwiki AIV but was declined and ask to engage in village pump discussion. However, they don't wish to engage in meaningful discussion at village pump and wow, here they are. Forumshopping indeed.--Cohaf (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Comment Comment No, we have local consensus to chack because some administrators in zh RFCUHAM agree to check due to their editing habit are similar and we are already discussed in the disscussion page. Iswjy1mcb (talk) 22:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Comment Comment@Iswjy1mcb:. May I understand which zhwiki administrator agreed to the check? And may I know what consensus there are. In addition, it'll be wise to use the preview button rather than editing a sentence 10 times. Best Regards,--Cohaf (talk) 23:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Let me make this clear: No administrators were involved in local discussion, and forum shopping is not allowed at Meta. Your request is likely to be rejected. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 00:27, 10 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Cohaf: Sanmosa agreed to check Iswjy1mcb (talk) 02:50, 10 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Sanmosa is NOT an administrator.--Cohaf (talk) 02:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Comment Comment @Cohaf: It is suspected that MTR 558391 is used for vandalism and Shek Ming Fai for normal editing, checking for sleepers is needed. It looks like a duck to meIswjy1mcb (talk) 03:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- My goodness. You reported to AIV and an administrator told you to start a discussion at Village Pump and determined it as a content dispute but you didn't. And now you are at meta saying the same. What grounds are there for a sleepers check? I will strongly encourage you to drop the stick before I push for sanctions for forumshopping at zhwiki. If you want the check, fine go ahead, but I request the steward to check this account also to make sure it isn't a good hand bad hand account and they seems to have very similar interests to the above 2 as well as editing tendencies. --Cohaf (talk) 03:29, 10 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Why on earth are you so stubborn, Iswjy1mcb? Stewards will not check until a local consensus comes into being. Why not follow zh.wiki administrator's advice? Do you think you are superior to admins or what?! Stop your rudeness. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 09:14, 10 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Comment Comment@Iswjy1mcb:. May I understand which zhwiki administrator agreed to the check? And may I know what consensus there are. In addition, it'll be wise to use the preview button rather than editing a sentence 10 times. Best Regards,--Cohaf (talk) 23:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Could a steward or meta admin close this request as premature and lacking consensus from local discussion? Alex Shih (talk) 09:38, 10 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Alex Shih:. I would rather the closing reason being invalid, forum shopping, SNOW and disruptive checking. But yes, this needs to be closed by a steward as soon as possible. I'm not sure whether a meta admin could do it or not.--Cohaf (talk) 13:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- Not done - checkuser isn't a weapon to use against the other side of a content dispute. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
MTR 553891@zh.wikipedia
Status: In progress
- List of users
- MTR 553891 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Shek Ming Fai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#MTR 553891
- I'd throw swear words at you if not for urbanity's sake. This is a repetitive request. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 01:13, 11 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
- I would like to find out whether MTR 553891 is used for vandalism and Shek Ming Fai for normal editing or not due to frequent editing on such articles. It looks like a duck to me Iswjy1mcb (talk) 01:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC) [reply ]
A few time@zh.wikipedia
Status: In progress
- List of users
- A few time (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- A few weeks (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#A few time
See also
- Archives:
- 2006
- 2007: 01, 07.
- 2008: 01, 03.
- 2009: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12.
- 2010: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12.
- 2011: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2012: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2013: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2014: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2015: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2016: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2017: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2018: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2019: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2020: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2021: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2022: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2023: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2024: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2025: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- CheckUser policy.
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation