Jump to content
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Steward requests/Checkuser/2015-03

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 10 years ago by MarcoAurelio in topic Requests
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in March 2015, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

Latest comment: 10 years ago 30 comments17 people in discussion

Dmitryne@ru.wikisource.org

Status:  Done
List of users
Dmitryne (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
OstapBinder (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
MedvedevDmitriy (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )

Reason(s): Dmitryne nominates s:ru:Лентапедия/Дворников, Михаил for deletion. Community strongly refuse to deletion (see s:ru:Викитека:К удалению/Архив/2015#Лентапедия/Дворников, Михаил). Then Dmitryne nominates several others articles of Лентапедия for deletion (s:ru:Викитека:К удалению/Архив/2015). In Jan. 26 Dmitryne send me email with a unsubstantiated accusation of s:ru:User:Lozman and some others. In Feb. 25 the newbie OstapBinder nominates for deletion s:ru:Лентапедия/Аун Сан Су Чжи (s:ru:Викитека:К удалению) and MedvedevDmitriy joins to the discussion.

There are no check users in ru-ws. Please, check those accounts to identity and notify us in s:ru:Викитека:Администрирование#Проверка MedvedevDmitriy и OstapBinder на виртуалов Dmitryne. It's better the steward to be a russian-spoken. -- Sergey kudryavtsev (talk) 14:53, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 Confirmed Dmitryne, KuznecovGrigory, Ruþín16, OstapBinder, MedvedevDmitriy. He did a pretty good attempt to cover tracks. Almost had me missing it. I don't speak Russian, though I do speak CU and IP. <g>  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: Thank you. I not undersatnd your last phrase "I do speak CU and IP", what's CU and IP? -- Sergey kudryavtsev (talk) 18:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
@Sergey kudryavtsev: checkuser and IP4 addresses (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx), it was meant to be a joke, though not a good one. :-)  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Picker78@el.wikipedia

Status:  Done
List of users
Picker78 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Lonesome Warrior (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
LowRider69 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Promiscuous man (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )

Reason(s): In order to ban permanently these accounts as sockpuppets. Lonesome warrior has Steward requests/Checkuser/2015-02#Sakis Sg@el.wikipedia already been confirmed as a sockpuppet. Maybe Picker78, already known to have multiple accounts, is the user behind them all. C messier (talk) 17:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Is it possible to find all the puppets associated with Picker78? --C messier (talk) 17:15, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Picker78, Lonesome Warrior, Promiscuous man and Sakis Sg are  Confirmed to be the same user. LowRider69 is Possible Possible. Ruslik (talk) 17:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Ali1like@fa.wikipedia

Status:  Done
List of users
Ali1like (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Eligold (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
مادستان (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )

Reason(s): Conflicts and edit warring in articles related to and including fa:ملایر. Continuous disruption, even after sysop warnings. The users have so far broken the three-revert rule by supporting each others reverts.

Note: مادستان is highly suspected to be suckpuppet based on WP:Duck test. -- Nojan (talk) 00:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
If it is so obvious why to ask for checkuser? Ruslik (talk) 16:44, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't have enough clue to take action. They all show the same interest in ethnic-related topics, but apart from recently created مادستان, Ali1like account was created on 11 Aug 2014 and Eligold in May 2013. مادستان is most probably a suckpuppet, but I am not sure to which of the two it belongs. -- Nojan (talk) 02:59, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
مادستان is Likely Likely socketpuppet of Ali1like. Ruslik (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Lukas_GamingLT@lt.wikipedia

Status:  Done
List of users
Lukas_GamingLT (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Dovydaz_35 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Reason(s): Lukas_GamingLT has been recently blocked for disruptive activities. Dovydaz_35's editing patterns and conversation style strongly suggest that he's a sockpuppet created to evade the block. For example, Dovydaz_35 removed a copyright violation template from the article created by Lukas_GamingLT. --Homo (talk) 20:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Likely Likely - Technical evidence suggest that both users may be related. -- M\A 23:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Farvartish@fa.wikipedia

Status:  Not done
List of users
Farvartish (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Zhilbert (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Reason(s): hi could you please check relation between Farvartish and Zhilbert .these two useres edit in fa.wiki and it seems they abusive of user accounts for creation Weighty for their opinion in articles about kurds and armenians.سردشتی (talk) 17:37, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Not done You are blocked on the wiki, and there is no evidence that there is a requirement.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Ism schism@en.wikipedia

Status:  Not done
List of users
Ism schism (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
MBest-son (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Reason(s): I suspect Ism schism to be using the account MBest-son as a sock puppet. please check whether there is a link between the participants. AliAkar (talk) 09:51, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Not done En.wiki has local checkusers that will handle this locally. -- Tegel (Talk) 10:10, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
The filer is blocked on en.wikipedia and other wikis; maybe a CU should be done on the filer... --Rs chen 7754 05:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Ardabiligit@fa.wikipedia

Status:  Not done
List of users
Ardabiligit (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
2.183.188.37 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
80.242.13.80 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
89.43.4.46 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
5.22.25.166 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
188.211.3.230 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Reason(s): user Ardabiligit was banned due Vandalism. then he used IP: 5.22.25.166 to evade block which had been blocked again. he used another IP for racist Statement and edits for persian people and iranian ethnics Ehsan maleki (talk) 11:25, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
This request probably would not be done. The IPs usually do not need to be checked since they are dynamic and we can block them in our local Wikipedia temporarily if there would be any violation. Therefore IMO as a sysop, if you believe these IPs had wrong edits, you can write it on Admins' Noticeboard. くろまる Mehran Debate 07:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I am rejecting this request because in my opinion it will have the effect to publicy link, if possitive, accounts with IP addresses in a situation not covered by the privacy policy for such a disclosure. If negative, it would be fishing. Anyway, if the block of the account can be justified without the need of technical evidence then there is no need generally to perform a CU. Thanks. -- M\A 12:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

مکری11@fa.wikipedia

Status:  Done
List of users
مکری11 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
سردشتی (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Reason(s): User:مکری11 had been blocked for one year due to violation of several Wikipedia policies. User:سردشتی also had similar edits with مکری11 and the account was created when مکری11 had been blocked. Recently سردشتی was blocked indefinitely and right after that, مکری11 began to edit in the same article which سردشتی did (above links). There is nearly no doubt that سردشتی and مکری11 are the same (because سردشتی changed a comment of مکری11), however I want to be sure about it. And please specify every Sockpuppets that these two used (probably during the blocking term) since these are highly suspected of block evasion. くろまる Mehran Debate 07:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
These two are Likely Likely. No other sockspuppet found. einsbor talk 15:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. くろまる Mehran Debate 15:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Koka11@sq.wikipedia

Status:  Not done
List of users
Koka11 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Rrjedha (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
  • CU log
  • Discussion: There have been severa discussions if Koka11 and Rrjedha have the same user, but the discussions are in Albanian like here and here.
Reason(s): They both contribute with a lot of unencyclopedic stuff and they mainly use Wikipedia as a publishing centre for their personal studies. And please specify every Sockpuppets that these two used. Ammar Tivari Talk! 15:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

MoreInfo  Additional information needed @Ammartivari: Hello. Since I can't read Albanian I had to rely on automatic translation to read the discussions you linked. It seems that in the first one, at the bottom, Koka11 admits that he and Rrjedha do work for the same company or work for the same editorial line. Is that correct? If so, if both are disruptive, why can't them just be blocked without CU? Best regards. -- M\A 12:20, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Not done. No response. -- M\A 10:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Gire 3pich2005@fa.wikipedia

Status:  Not done
List of users
Gire 3pich2005 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Iranian engineer (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
Reason(s): Trying to create w:WP:GHBH (e.g. this way of talking) Amir (talk) 14:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
It's compromised account, he made one in fawikivoyage too. Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 18:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment Comment user clearly mentioned that both accounts belong to him, no need to CU Mardetanha talk 22:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw Amir (talk) 14:07, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /