Steward requests/Checkuser/2017-06

Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in June 2017, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

Latest comment: 7 years ago 21 comments15 people in discussion

Uthayai@ta.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Uthayai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser ); Sjrahem (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )

CU log
Discussion: User talk page and ta.wiki has similar policy like en.wiki

Reason(s): User1 have been blocked due to creation of inappropriate pages, and user2 creates what blocked user tried to do, and advocate for user1. Also, check any users/IPs link to these users. Thanks. --Antan O 14:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

It seems promotional work in several Wikimedia projects. @Vituzzu: Do we need to take action for such promotional work? --Antan O 05:09, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Likely Likely, most of technical informations are common to both accounts. Linedwell ^[talk] 07:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Bertrand101@en.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: DYIZ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser ); Eddie Abellana (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )

CU log
Discussion: w:wp:Sockpuppet investigations/Bertrand101

Reason(s): Duck on Bertrand101 socks the Abellana reported a hoax radio DZHH-AM was owned by Audiovisual Communicators (which is the targets of Bertrand101) and a new sock spotted DYIZ which is editing on en:Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation, en:GMA Network and en:Bea Binene 2602:306:36D5:5690:FC89:1994:2B14:14F9 20:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Not done enwiki has its own checkusers. Please, ask them. Ruslik (talk) 20:50, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

My Royal Young@en.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: The Grand Spearton (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser ); Lod's Warrior (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser ); Ultra oort cloud (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser ); Prinsipe Lod (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser ); Prinsipe Elford (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )

CU log
Discussion: w:wp:Sock puppetry

Reason(s): '1.75x amplified ultimate quack of ultimate destiny:' long term case exists 2602:306:36D5:5690:9444:888A:4D71:4CD5 20:15, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Not done. En.wiki has their own Checkusers, so you have to bring it up with them on en.wiki. -- Tegel _(Talk) 20:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

AndrewChief@ro.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: AndrewChief (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser ); Ovidiu Doman (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )

CU log
Discussion: w:ro:WP:Clone

Reason(s): After Ovidiu Doman was blocked for repeatedly introducing false death dates in biographies of living people, last time at w:ro:Denisa Emilia Răducu, AndrewChief registered his account and introduced the same false statement in the same article last edited by Ovidiu Doman, this time with an edit summary. Andrei Stroe (talk) 11:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Inconclusive Inconclusive from a CU point of view. I would advice you to block them based on their edits and actions, since CU isn't helpful here. Trijnstel _talk 23:41, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Younes19956@mediawiki.org

Status: Done

List of users: Younes19956 ([[; Special:Contributions/Younes19956|contr]] · [[; Special:DeletedContributions/Younes19956|deleted]] · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )

CU log
Discussion: phab:Z567 (restricted link, ping any of the very involved commonists, NDA-ers, etc. for access (I wish we have an acl*stewards access list on phabricator))

Reason(s): Wikipedia Zero Morocco Case. This user, who just registered on mediawikiwiki, have shown an unusually high interest in the piracy from Wikipedia Zero Morocco Case in Phabricator. If it's needed, commons:Category:Users_suspected_of_abusing_Wikipedia_Zero has thousands of duck-socks that could be used for reference in the CheckUser process. Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 01:17, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Support Support to preform this request as fast as you can --Alaa :)..! 03:11, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Support Support Dispenser (talk) 18:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

See also other users which got blocked. I'd need IP ranges, as wide as possible, to block their registration on mediawiki.org. --Nemo 19:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed as a sock of Toumi.29, Younes fati, Younesel ell, Alaho akbar ya rabi, Gjfgjfj, Hgdfgh and Youneshhhda. Ruslik (talk) 12:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

IMPP-Dragan@sh.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: IMPP-Dragan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )

CU log

Reason(s): This is a newly created account with practically no edits, with the exception of Janevistan, a humorous and satirical page present on sh.wikipedia. The same goes for Meta. We suspect that there are multiple accounts and IP addresses connected to this one, therefore we would like to check if it is true. This account seems to have been created in order for the troll/vandal to be able to spam the talk page, which has been locked for IPs and new users specifically because of one person's incessant spamming. There might be very old and for a long time inactive (or blocked) accounts connected to this one Edgar Allan Poe (talk) 09:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Not done You can look at the corresponding page in enwiki. Ruslik (talk) 20:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Ruslik0, I do apologize for the inconvenience. I wasn't aware of the fact that the sockpuppet had already been proven elsewhere. My mistake. And thank you for the reply --Edgar Allan Poe (talk) 22:00, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

LUMEA 2017@ro.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: LUMEA 2017 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser ); BAICAN XXX (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )

CU log
Discussion: ro.wikipedia Interdicție Baican

Reason(s): LUMEA 2017 posted defamatory remarks about Romanian Wiktionary and me as an administrator on several Romanian language projects. Style, tone and content are similar to BAICAN XXX's (indefinitely blocked on all Romanian language projects, with a history of limited blocks on other sister projects such as en, de, it, fr, etc.). The user has a long list of known sock puppets, I just want to check if this too belongs to them so that I can make a decision as to how to proceed in this matter. Robbie SWE (talk) 09:27, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

I support this request. I thought for a moment about indefinitely blocking the account on the grounds of "Duck". What's the probability of a single purpose account deploring on ro.wikipedia the absence from ro.wiktionary of an infamous incompetent user - especially when it comes to language? Plus Baican's well-known idiosyncrasy of referring to himself in the third person... --Mihai P. (talk) 19:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Likely Likely. And also a possible sockpuppet: Visireanu (talk · contribs). Please check if this account matches the modus operandi. Trijnstel _talk 23:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

@Trijnstel: thanks! This user has for too long tested the patience of the Romanian community. I'm contemplating if a global ban request is the next appropriate step for us to take in order to solve this matter. --Robbie SWE (talk) 12:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser/2017-06&oldid=24907321"