Steward requests/Checkuser/2023-04

no i NEVER trolled, thats the contrary because I explained several usurpations and i denounced the usurpation contest they do since about one month with the help of IA software to imitate other contributors and force the admins and the check-users to make errors!2A01:E34:EC45:6400:FD87:896:3CE3:5D39 19:12, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

@Do not follow: read the pages on FR in RCUS and in the pages dedicated to each banned, they explained that the banned imitate themself among them which explain why sometime the RCU can not be sure who is who, thats normal because the trolls just play with them and their nerves!

To eliminate all doubt: it should be clear that I charge nobody but it is clear that this IP are linked to one "usual suspect" i DONT say that zolapin and baldurar or Noah are the same personne but the job of the RCU is to know who it is! 2A01:E34:EC45:6400:FD87:896:3CE3:5D39 19:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Please, this is not a place for discussions. The request was already declined, thanks. Superpes15 (talk) 19:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

• Confirmed Maccomcre, Turpd
• Unrelated Unrelated Opky9407

---

• Opky9407 used proxies or VPN.

From a technical point of view. Co-editing or socks? --Sotiale (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

I would say they behave more like socks than co-editing.—${\displaystyle \int }${\displaystyle \int }(☎) 07:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed--Vituzzu (talk) 09:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Please explain why this investigation is required, there are very few stewards who read Chinese(or could be alone). --Sotiale (talk) 05:45, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, this is admin from zhwiki. Sorry for the confusion. This request is submitted because it is reported that --

1. all three accounts involved in adding contents with copyright concerns to the article zh:天道_(台灣電視劇);
2. their behaviors (i.e., the contents they added) are very similar;
3. the time they presented are close;
4. two accounts are created very recently;
5. a series of IP edits also involved in the above mentioned copy violations with a similar behavioral pattern.

Therefore, I, along with our SPI clerk 1233, think that an investigation is necessary. -- KirkLU (talk) 08:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

• Unrelated Unrelated Ivenchiu, 方豔曦 and Naruto16898

Thanks for your straightforward explanation. From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 08:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Comment A new account, created after the blocking of Papakostasgiorgos is ̺Stavrougiorgos, and seems to be related with them. Most likely there is a connection with this case of sockpuppetry (= accounts Giorgoselefteriadis, Stavrougeorgios & Giorgosneris; note that username Giorgoselefteriadis is a variation of Giorgoseleftheriadis, and username Stavrougeorgios a variation of Stavrougiorgos). ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 08:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

PS. There's also another "Giorgoseleftheriadis"-type of account, Giorgoseleftheriadis2. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 08:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

In general, it is not allowed for a user blocked by socks to directly request themselves as the subject of investigation unless it is specifically necessary. If you need to investigate, discuss it locally or ask the admins to request. In this regard, I will hold this request for 3 days, but if there is no consent to the request in the meantime, I will close this request. --Sotiale (talk) 04:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

I see...you can check requests from ip but not from accounts!! ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη (talk) 17:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

It seems that some condition(which account) is missing. In any case, I would like your cooperation to process this request. --Sotiale (talk) 05:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Normally, just like Sotiale, I would have declined your request. But there was a need for both a sleeper check on you and the other users listed. Further requests by a blocked user on the wiki should be declined. So without further ado:

• Confirmed Kostaselliniadis, Giorgoseleftheriadis2, Papakostasgiorgos, Giorgoseleftheriadis, Giorgoseleftheriadis1
• Confirmed Ναυτόπαις, ArkofBuhara, ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη, Sayyid al Shuhada, MartinLutherPing, GiannisZois, HBPEMD
• Both groups are Possible Possible to each other. -- Amanda (she/her) 23:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

So how about asking the hiwiki admins to block them? Did they reject your request or require you to request checkuser? --Sotiale (talk) 04:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined It's pretty obvious that they are connected. No need for CU here. -- Amanda (she/her) 23:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

• Confirmed FamousPatrick, Renamed user Ql4mD3uV9y8pxH, Renamed user t9KjM2uN7L, Mosowai

From a technical point of view. --Sotiale (talk) 10:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

No comment with respect to IP address(es). Declined for the account, as blocked already on local wiki. No steward is going to take several IP votestacking seriously in deciding permissions. -- Amanda (she/her) 01:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Sadly, all I can give is a Confirmed, nothing else. -- Amanda (she/her) 01:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

It's a school network. I can't block any ranges they are so large, and I can't confirm who is who because of behavior. My best recommendation is just treat them like vandalism-only accounts. -- Amanda (she/her) 02:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

• Confirmed Issliapi, 喬治盧卡絲, Chocola Lala, DENDEND1998, 元桃園桃花源嚮, 药神小厨师, 斯坦買買提, Keoghpeer, 恩多力良多
• Confirmed Pleaasage, Cribssited2003, 阿甜師, 布之火舞, 天气小李子, 一番多鄰國
• Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) between the two. They are on the same range, with the same very common UA. Sleeper check extremely difficult on this range. 5000 edits goes back 15 days. -- Amanda (she/her) 02:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Definitely was worth the check, but the first 4 I looked at all come from completely different ranges. CU is useless. An edit filter might be better here. -- Amanda (she/her) 03:00, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

You only linked to your village pump, not the discussion, but that doesn't really matter here.

• Likely Likely Deva2110488, 2240565prathipa, 2210186abhivarshini, Roobesh Amirthalingam, 2240676michaldamacmeller, Ebino thommy, 2240677mithun, 2230316Ebino thommy, 2240284amalajothialpart, SWADHARSHINI N, 2211382vaishnavipsivaram
• Likely Likely 2211477deekshitha, Shreya Kaundinya, Shasanth MK 2210184, 2211228 Jaishree Palaniappan, 2230781anurathi, 2240124 JV Baarathi, Suji N 2240138, Nivasini.A 2231376, Nivasini.A, 2211182 Vaishnavi Sampath, Keerthinivashini P, Nihantha M, 2231376 Nivasini.A
• The above 2 groups are Possible Possible to each other, along with Shyam Parthasarathy 2110492 individually
• Likely Likely to each other, Unrelated Unrelated to the above: SenorSudamerica24, MisterBenelux23, Adamstown50, DidiMaker

-- Amanda (she/her) 14:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

• Declined I honestly don't understand why someone who is blocked has no chance to appeal on their talkpage or via email...that seems counter the values Wikipedia implores. But, alas, viwiki has two of it's own community checkusers that you can reach out to for this, either through their meta talkpage or meta email. There is nothing stewards can do about this. -- Amanda (she/her) 20:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

• Talk archives
• Steward requests archive/Checkuser

• Noindexed pages