Steward requests/Checkuser/2018-09
Requests
Uihim@zh.wikipedia
- List of users
- Uihim (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Anghuaniau (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: w:zh:User_talk:Uihim#2018年8月
- It's not really useful to just say "see discussion above" when it's all in Chinese; and there wasn't much discussion. Lanwi1 made a sock block on both accounts (with the master being stale until the current unblock request) based on presumably deleted revision history of zh:李雨蓁; AT simply asked what the blocking administrator wants to do, so here we are. A check would definitely be useful though, since Uihim denies any connection. Alex Shih (talk) 03:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Doing... — regards, Revi 08:41, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Technically they are Unrelated Unrelated. — regards, Revi 08:46, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Zhenggnehz@zh.wikipedia
- List of users
- Zhenggnehz (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- 2rvea3 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- TaiwanofChina (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Changshaone (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Zhong-Gneoz (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Xwerds (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- XueTeng (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Zhenggnehz
- It's a good behavioral pattern match based on local discussion. I have a feeling that there won't be much sleepers based on previous checks, but probably nice if a steward could take a look again anyway. My impression is that zh.wiki is usually pretty accurate at tracking their LTA cases. Alex Shih (talk) 03:37, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- can this request be expedited as there is a pending unblock request which can only be accepted or declined based on the CU results. --Cohaf (talk) 02:15, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Bump. Although this was originally a vandalism-only account block, since now it's been suspected as LTA, if a steward can take a look that would be greatly appreciated... Alex Shih (talk) 09:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- can this request be expedited as there is a pending unblock request which can only be accepted or declined based on the CU results. --Cohaf (talk) 02:15, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- I've been (sort of) Single Point of Failure for zhwiki CU requests... Had real life commitment. Now Doing... — regards, Revi 09:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Completed.
- Confirmed: 2rvea3, TaiwanofChina, Changshaone, Zhong-Gneoz
- Xwerds is Unlikely Unlikely to the #1.
- XueTeng used open proxy. No trace to #1,#2,#4.
- Zhenggnehz is also Unlikely Unlikely to the #1.
Each group is Unrelated Unrelated with each other, unless otherwise stated.
— regards, Revi 10:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks revi, as always. Alex Shih (talk) 14:52, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- seconded.--Cohaf (talk) 04:43, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- -revi,had other sleeper in here?--MCC214 Talk with me#Contributions with me 06:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- If I don't say about sleepers, that means there is no immediately visible sleeper. I don't think I need to repeat this every time, so please bear this in mind in the future. — regards, Revi 14:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks!--MCC214 Talk with me#Contributions with me 10:18, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Libertarianmoderate@en.wikivoyage
- List of users
- Libertarianmoderate (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- American Ride (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- WVOnline (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Doing... --Alaa :)..! 10:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Completed. Confirmed: Libertarianmoderate, SmokinTourist909, Zayn Hussein, WVOnline, Iraqistan, LibMod, American Ride
- regards --Alaa :)..! 10:18, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Exspell@el.wikipedia
- List of users
- Exspell (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- ΕρΚιλλ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Μαντίνγκο (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Vrahomarinaner (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Skylax30 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: el:Βικιπαίδεια:Μαριονέτα
Additional discussion |
---|
Comment Comment Possible connection between the two from another point of view: a theoretical perspective. "ΕρΚιλλ" (=ErKill in latin letters) was a trοll and sock (see case Ελλ@el.wikipedia) who was running after user Τζερόνυμο. Its name derives from Killer (Κill er> Er kill> ErKill), ostensibly implying that its purpose was "to kill" Τζερόνυμο, meaning making things so difficult for him in WP, in order to force him to quit. "Exspell" is Expel (although misspelled), meaning of course that its aim is expelling user Τζερόνυμο from WP, since "Exspell" is contributing in a way that reminds "ΕρΚιλλ". ——Chalk19 (talk) 16:26, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Comment Comment restored: I would almost verify the meaning of my nickname, if Tzeronymo was an evil spirit. Actually it has to do with (magic) spell. Fortunately, now in Greece the mood is for a cold retsina by the sea.--Exspell (talk) 08:20, 19 July 2018 (UTC) [[#ref_{{{1}}}|^]] The user who requested this CU, deleted today my above comment. It's a tactic he applies in the greek WP to suppress opinions, but he doesn't have the right to do it here. Does he? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Exspell (talk) 15:58, 19 July 2018 (UTC) Comment Comment User Exspell is once again violating the rules of this request, as it appears that he is not aware of the legislation. After all, it is well-known that this is NOT a vote, but a technical request exclusively to administrators of Meta. In other words, I can once again see another attempt to hinder the completion of the checkuser. That was the case only a few months ago with user Ελλ, who opened dialogue and later accused me of inappropriate practices, yet he was the one lying about his multiple sock puppets. A coincidence? Who knows, right? Without further ado, I am going to let the administrators do their job as noted and wait patiently for the final outcome of the check. Again, thanks for your patience and assistance. It's needless to mention that I already know what the outcome will be. Best. Glucken123 (talk) 16:31, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
@-revi: @Ruslik0: can you please have a look at this request? It has been nine days since I posted it. Thanks. Glucken123 (talk) 11:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC) Dear -revi, can you please let me know if this is the right place to request a usercheck? It was placed almost two weeks ago, but still no response from any of the stewards.. Glucken123 (talk) 11:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Comment Comment when will this story end?--2A02:587:8049:AD00:A538:22A:AE9C:869B 16:45, 27 August 2018 (UTC) Comment Comment User's Skylax30 3 months block (for personal attacks) in el-WP has been doubled (for sockpuppetry) in the meantime by sysop Gts-tg on the grounds that he is definitely Exspell [8]. So this CU must be done ASAP because of the possibility of misjudgement. ——Chalk19 (talk) 08:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC) |
Declined data is stale. Feel free to re-file with new accounts if needed --Alaa :)..! 12:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Comment Dear Alaa had the CU be done in time, there would have been two accounts not stale. Glucken123 filed the case on July 15, 2018, and the next day he added user "Μαντίγκο" (a verified sock of the user "ΕρΚιλλ") to the list [9]; "Μαντίγκο"'s last edit in el-WP was on May 20, 2018. Later, on August 8th, another user added "Skylax30" to the list as a suscpected sock master; his last edit in el-WP was on June 5, 2018. So, there was data available at least until the 19th of August for both "Μαντίγκο" and "Skylax30", and by the 4th of September for just "Skylax30". Had our chance but it was blown away. ——Chalk19 (talk) 08:31, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Chalk19: I agree with you. Please ping me if there's any new request related to elwiki --Alaa :)..! 09:03, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
1|2|3k @sq.wikipedia
- List of users
- 1l2l3k (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Hatake (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Serasqeri (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- To the clerk with the intent of clarifying: I am an admin in sqwiki, and have no links to Hatake. MarinBarleti is a sock of Cinephile-al, who was banned from sqwiki with community decision. His list of socks, all blocked by me, can be found here. MarinBarleti (master is Cinephile-al) is trying desperately here to retaliate against me, linking me to Hatake, but we are in different cities, and are completely different people. I have been reported so many times by now here in Meta, that at this point I too would like a checkuser to stop this madness. To clarify further, Hatake is also banned from sqwiki with community decision and his list of socks (all blocked by me), can be found here.--1l2l3k (talk) 11:53, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing --Alaa :)..! 12:48, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
CrepyLex@ro.wikipedia
- List of users
- Alex Olaru (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Alex Olaru v2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CrepyLex (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: Romanian Wikipedia policy on checkuser is here: ro:Wikipedia:Checkuser
- Doing... --Alaa :)..! 12:49, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed --Alaa :)..! 12:54, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Taeyeon fan@zh.wikipedia
- List of users
- Taeyeon fan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Cosmos4261573 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- 一米八的米八 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- 卜兑兑 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Chloecc111 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Taeyeon fan
- per discussion, the users seems to be WP:SPA. A WP:MEAT / WP:DUCK can be possible in this case, and a CU may not be conclusive due to the low edit count, however, it might be useful as behavioral seems to be a match but the users denied connection with each other. Thanks.--Cohaf (talk) 07:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Doing... — regards, Revi 14:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Completed.
- Taeyeon fan, Cosmos4261573 is stale (It was stale at the time it was submitted to SRCU).
- 一米八的米八 and Chloecc111 are Inconclusive Inconclusive.
- 卜兑兑 are Confirmed with 第一次追星的珍珠糖. However, there's not enough data sample, so make your decision with behavioral data.
— regards, Revi 15:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- -revithanks, reported back.--Cohaf (talk) 12:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Alex Olaru@ro.wikipedia
- List of users
- Alex Olaru (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Dumitru65 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: w:ro:Wikipedia:Checkuser
- Doing... — regards, Revi 15:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Both are confirmed. No other socks visible. — regards, Revi 15:32, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Milimusic@ro.wikipedia
- List of users
- Milimusic (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- Mili dumitru gheorghiu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser )
- CU log
- Discussion: w:ro:Wikipedia:Checkuser
- @-revi: Still you are waiting to review my SR request. Web SourceContent (Management System) 15:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- They are the same user, which was evident without any checks. Ruslik (talk) 20:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)