Note

Go to the end to download the full example code. or to run this example in your browser via JupyterLite or Binder

Gaussian Mixture Model Selection#

This example shows that model selection can be performed with Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) using information-theory criteria. Model selection concerns both the covariance type and the number of components in the model.

In this case, both the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayes Information Criterion (BIC) provide the right result, but we only demo the latter as BIC is better suited to identify the true model among a set of candidates. Unlike Bayesian procedures, such inferences are prior-free.

# Authors: The scikit-learn developers
# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause

Data generation#

We generate two components (each one containing n_samples) by randomly sampling the standard normal distribution as returned by numpy.random.randn. One component is kept spherical yet shifted and re-scaled. The other one is deformed to have a more general covariance matrix.

importnumpyasnp
n_samples = 500
np.random.seed (0)
C = np.array ([[0.0, -0.1], [1.7, 0.4]])
component_1 = np.dot (np.random.randn (n_samples, 2), C) # general
component_2 = 0.7 * np.random.randn (n_samples, 2) + np.array ([-4, 1]) # spherical
X = np.concatenate ([component_1, component_2])

We can visualize the different components:

importmatplotlib.pyplotasplt
plt.scatter (component_1[:, 0], component_1[:, 1], s=0.8)
plt.scatter (component_2[:, 0], component_2[:, 1], s=0.8)
plt.title ("Gaussian Mixture components")
plt.axis ("equal")
plt.show ()

Gaussian Mixture components

Model training and selection#

We vary the number of components from 1 to 6 and the type of covariance parameters to use:

"full": each component has its own general covariance matrix.
"tied": all components share the same general covariance matrix.
"diag": each component has its own diagonal covariance matrix.
"spherical": each component has its own single variance.

We score the different models and keep the best model (the lowest BIC). This is done by using GridSearchCV and a user-defined score function which returns the negative BIC score, as GridSearchCV is designed to maximize a score (maximizing the negative BIC is equivalent to minimizing the BIC).

The best set of parameters and estimator are stored in best_parameters_ and best_estimator_, respectively.

fromsklearn.mixtureimport GaussianMixture
fromsklearn.model_selectionimport GridSearchCV
defgmm_bic_score(estimator, X):
"""Callable to pass to GridSearchCV that will use the BIC score."""
 # Make it negative since GridSearchCV expects a score to maximize
 return -estimator.bic(X)
param_grid = {
 "n_components": range(1, 7),
 "covariance_type": ["spherical", "tied", "diag", "full"],
}
grid_search = GridSearchCV (
 GaussianMixture (), param_grid=param_grid, scoring=gmm_bic_score
)
grid_search.fit(X)

GridSearchCV(estimator=GaussianMixture(),
 param_grid={'covariance_type': ['spherical', 'tied', 'diag',
 'full'],
 'n_components': range(1, 7)},
 scoring=<function gmm_bic_score at 0x7f489c450ee0>)

In a Jupyter environment, please rerun this cell to show the HTML representation or trust the notebook.
On GitHub, the HTML representation is unable to render, please try loading this page with nbviewer.org.

Plot the BIC scores#

To ease the plotting we can create a pandas.DataFrame from the results of the cross-validation done by the grid search. We re-inverse the sign of the BIC score to show the effect of minimizing it.

importpandasaspd
df = pd.DataFrame (grid_search.cv_results_)[
 ["param_n_components", "param_covariance_type", "mean_test_score"]
]
df["mean_test_score"] = -df["mean_test_score"]
df = df.rename(
 columns={
 "param_n_components": "Number of components",
 "param_covariance_type": "Type of covariance",
 "mean_test_score": "BIC score",
 }
)
df.sort_values(by="BIC score").head()

Number of components	Type of covariance	BIC score
19	2	full	1046.829429
20	3	full	1084.038689
21	4	full	1114.517272
22	5	full	1148.512281
23	6	full	1179.977890

importseabornassns
sns.catplot (
 data=df,
 kind="bar",
 x="Number of components",
 y="BIC score",
 hue="Type of covariance",
)
plt.show ()

plot gmm selection

In the present case, the model with 2 components and full covariance (which corresponds to the true generative model) has the lowest BIC score and is therefore selected by the grid search.

Plot the best model#

We plot an ellipse to show each Gaussian component of the selected model. For such purpose, one needs to find the eigenvalues of the covariance matrices as returned by the covariances_ attribute. The shape of such matrices depends on the covariance_type:

"full": (n_components, n_features, n_features)
"tied": (n_features, n_features)
"diag": (n_components, n_features)
"spherical": (n_components,)

frommatplotlib.patchesimport Ellipse
fromscipyimport linalg
color_iter = sns.color_palette ("tab10", 2)[::-1]
Y_ = grid_search.predict(X)
fig, ax = plt.subplots ()
for i, (mean, cov, color) in enumerate(
 zip(
 grid_search.best_estimator_.means_,
 grid_search.best_estimator_.covariances_,
 color_iter,
 )
):
 v, w = linalg.eigh (cov)
 if not np.any (Y_ == i):
 continue
 plt.scatter (X[Y_ == i, 0], X[Y_ == i, 1], 0.8, color=color)
 angle = np.arctan2 (w[0][1], w[0][0])
 angle = 180.0 * angle / np.pi # convert to degrees
 v = 2.0 * np.sqrt (2.0) * np.sqrt (v)
 ellipse = Ellipse (mean, v[0], v[1], angle=180.0 + angle, color=color)
 ellipse.set_clip_box(fig.bbox)
 ellipse.set_alpha(0.5)
 ax.add_artist(ellipse)
plt.title (
 f"Selected GMM: {grid_search.best_params_['covariance_type']} model, "
 f"{grid_search.best_params_['n_components']} components"
)
plt.axis ("equal")
plt.show ()