| Accession: | |
|---|---|
| Functional site class: | Cyclin N-terminal Domain Docking Motifs |
| Functional site description: | Cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) coordinate hundreds of molecular events during the cell cycle via Ser/Thr phosphorylation. With cell cycle progression, different cyclins bind to Cdks to control their function by providing docking sites for substrates and also by modulating Cdk active site specificity. Docking motifs control the timing of cell cycle events by enabling preferential interaction and phosphorylation of substrates by a specific cyclin/Cdk complex. Cyclins use the conserved hydrophobic pocket (hp) to bind docking motifs on partner proteins. In the budding yeast, the divergence of the hp has given rise to a family of related RxL-like docking motifs consisting of a hydrophobic core modulated by positively charged (RxLF, RxLxF) or hydrophobic (LxF, PxF, NLxxxL) residues. Cyclins may use additional surfaces to dock substrates, as with the mammalian Cyclin D-specific (DOC_CYCLIN_D_Helix_1) and the budding yeast Cln2-specific leucine- and proline-rich LP (DOC_CYCLIN_yCln2_LP_2) motifs. |
| ELMs with same func. site: | DOC_CYCLIN_RevRxL_6 DOC_CYCLIN_RxL_1 DOC_CYCLIN_yClb1_LxF_4 DOC_CYCLIN_yClb3_PxF_3 DOC_CYCLIN_yClb5_NLxxxL_5 DOC_CYCLIN_yCln2_LP_2 |
| ELM Description: | The budding yeast late-G1 Cln1/2 and Ccn1-type cyclins recognize leucine- and proline-rich (LP) docking motifs on G1-specific substrates (Koivomagi,2011; Bhaduri,2011; Bhaduri,2015, Bandyopadhyay,2020). LP motif docking is conserved across fungal Cln-type cyclins (Bandyopadhyay,2020) and is highly specific, not being recognized by early-G1 Cln3 or by S- and M-phase cyclins (Bhaduri,2015; Bhaduri,2011). Mutational studies suggest that the recognition interface for LP motifs on Cln1/2 is distinct from the hydrophobic pocket (hp) described to bind other cyclin docking motifs (Bhaduri,2015). However, in the absence of a solved structure, the binding site could not be mapped conclusively. LP motif-driven multi-site substrate phosphorylation (Ord,2019) is largely independent of orientation and distance to the Cdk p-site (Bhaduri,2011, Koivomagi,2013). Many known Cln1/2-specific Cdk1 substrates harbour LP docking motifs. The role of the motif was confirmed in Sic1, Ste5 and Ste20 by truncation/mutation studies and dedicated assays monitoring associated phenotypic outcomes (Koivomagi,2011; Bhaduri,2011). Mutation of the Ste20 motif "SLDDPIQF" revealed that no single residue is absolutely required for Cln2 binding, but mutations at the L, P or F residues led to partial phenotypes (Bhaduri,2011). At the same time, four Cln2-binding sequences (those of Sic1, Whi5, Exo84 and Ste5) contained exact matches of the core LLPP motif with no requirement for a large hydrophobic/aromatic residue in the following residue positions (Bhaduri,2011). A mutational scan using a functional readout confirmed the requirement for L and P at positions 1 and 4, and showed that hydrophobic/aromatic residues at positions 5 and 7 modulate the motif binding affinity and functional potency (Bandyopadhyay,2020), being required when the core motif is weak. With no structure available, the final motif pattern was derived from the mutation analyses and the evolutionary conservation of multiple LP motifs (Bhaduri,2011). |
| Pattern: | (L[MLIV]PP)|(((L[LMIV]PA)|(L..P))[ILMVAFYW].[MLIVFHPAY]) |
| Pattern Probability: | 0.0001070 |
| Present in taxon: | Saccharomycetaceae |
| Interaction Domain: |
Cyclin_N (PF00134)
Cyclin, N-terminal domain
(Stochiometry: 1 : 1)
|