While EME portfolio debt and equity inflows are negatively related to US monetary policy and trade policy uncertainty, trade openness is a key counterweight. Lower US interest rates due to a slowing US economy could trigger foreign capital inflows to EMEs, but persistent US inflation could prompt tighter US monetary policy and portfolio reallocation by global investors out of EMEs. TPU is also found to be negatively associated with EME portfolio debt and equity inflows, with rising TPU likely to lead to flight-to-safety flows. On domestic factors, higher trade openness is identified as a key driver of EME portfolio debt and equity inflows. Moreover, the magnitude of the trade openness effect is greater than that of US monetary policy and TPU.
EME cross-border loans are strongly negatively affected by escalations in geopolitical risk, but financial development helps boost foreign lending inflows. Heightened GPR disincentivizes international banks to lend abroad. Under these circumstances, international banks are likely to tighten credit standards and reallocate lending toward safer jurisdictions. However, the analysis also reveals a significant positive role for financial development in attracting foreign lending. While this effect is somewhat smaller than the GPR effect, efficient domestic financial systems with sound prudential and supervisory frameworks help to reassure international bank lenders in EMEs.
Geopolitical risk significantly deters foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows into EMEs, as do trade policy uncertainty and global risk aversion, while GDP growth acts as the main domestic driver of inflows. Elevated GPR and TPU significantly raise the risk on long-term investment such as FDI. Higher global risk aversion, which reflects weaker investor sentiment, also discourages FDI inflows. The effects on FDI are most pronounced due to GPR. On the other hand, the analysis shows that GDP growth can significantly boost FDI inflows, although its impact remains smaller than that of the global factors overall.