Wikipedia:XfD today

Purge server cache

Victor Henningsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

The article currently does not cite any sources, and I was unable to find significant coverage of Henningsen in secondary sources beyond an obituary in the New York Times. His positions at Henningsen Foods and various local and nonprofit organisations do not appear to confer presumed notability. SuperCode111 (talk to me!) 02:13, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Politics. SuperCode111 (talk to me!) 02:13, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Kiddwaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

Delete – The article does not appear to satisfy the general notability guideline (WP:GNG). The available sources do not provide significant coverage establishing encyclopedic notability. Reality show participant without winning, and the article relies heavily on coverage related to the reality television and publicity rather than enduring secondary sources. Altitude Multitude (talk) 21:43, 19 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Nigeria, Actors and filmmakers, Businesspeople, and Television. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 22:26, 19 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Keep - there are quite a few BBC Pidgin sources out there when I run my WP:BEFORE, as well as Vanguard News, DSTV, The Nation, Daily Post Nigeria, Tribune, etc - and a ton of them are quite a bit after and about different things, for example a controversial post he made about BBLs, his participation in some sort of arena game in 2025, comments he's made about his occupation being heir, and an assortment of other controversies. Jishara (talk) Jishara (talk) 06:40, 20 July 2026 (UTC) reply

@Jishara Could you link them? My before-skills with Nigerian media isn't incredible. 1brianm7 (talk) 03:54, 27 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Sure! The Sun Nigeria, Ripples Nigeria, Nation Online Nigeria, BBC Pidgin Daily Post Nation Online Nigeria BBC Pidgin Vanguard Nigeria BBC Pidgin The Sun Nigeria Gazette Nigeria Modern Ghana The Sun Nigeria Nation Online Nigeria, etc. And I really don't think NEWSORGNIGERIA is in play here since most of them seem to be depicting him in a negative light, and also since neither BBC Pidgin nor Modern Ghana fall within that Jishara (talk) 12:12, 27 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:51, 27 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:46, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

July 2026 State of the Union Address to Pyidaungsu Hluttaw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

The formatting and structure indicates this might have been written with WP:LLM AI. For instance, there are many sections uncited and bolded sub-headings that do not meat MOS The content itself is also very fluffery-adjacent and likely is WP:UNDUE coverage. Beyond that, it also likely does not meet WP:NEVENT as the coverage is recent and routine even if covered in diverse sources EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 01:21, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Suspected AI-generated articles, and Myanmar. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:54, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

2004 Tashkent suicide bombings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

I propose merging to List of Islamist terrorist attacks because this page falls under WP:NOPAGE and very likely does not meet WP:NEVENT. There are books that cover this event after it happened, like this one, but this is from the US state department, which was involved in this event, so it is not WP:INDEPENDENT. In terms of WP:NEVENT, coverage does not demonstrate WP:LASTING effects or any casestudies HerrHeulsuse (talk) 08:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Terrorism, Islam, Uzbekistan, Israel, and United States of America. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 08:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Merge to Islamic Jihad Union, the perpetrator. The list is too broad to be a good redirect in lieu of this one. PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:35, 28 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Keep per WP:NEVENT and WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. There has been substantial coverage over time of this event, as evident from Google Books. The nomination places undue emphasis on a single book, creating a distraction. For a short article, this one does a good job of focusing on the event itself rather than its background or aftermath. gidonb (talk) 09:15, 28 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Still adding that the target is unsuited as it is far too high level for merging. gidonb (talk) 00:34, 1 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Keep - seems to meet CONTINUEDCOVERAGE (quick GScholar search for >2005). Dunno about LASTING (but would err on does meet side given apparent coverage), and dunno about sources' independence (but would err on are independent from quick perusal). - Asdfjrjjj (talk) 07:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:48, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Van Petten, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. No evidence of a community at this location.

The article Welcome to Ven Petten: Population 2 only describes a couple who live next to the former rail depot, who have turned their home into a sort of museum. No mention is made of a former larger town. –dlthewave ☎ 22:16, 18 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 22:16, 18 July 2026 (UTC) reply
• Keep: Added some sources. Also, the "Van Petten:Population 2" article does mention former establishments, including a general store, grain company, and railroad station. This was never a vibrant town, but it was a recognized community.--Milowent • ^{has spoken} 17:44, 22 July 2026 (UTC) reply

The general store and grain company are typical for what you'd find on the grounds of a simple rural railroad station. I'm not sure where the "recognized community" description is coming from. Although it was platted as a town, we don't have any evidence that a town ever actually formed there. –dlthewave ☎ 04:00, 23 July 2026 (UTC) reply

I mean informally recognized. And there's a 2010 news story saying they have a mayor and pay town taxes in 2010 to remain a town. I understand why you nominated the article for deletion, but i think its sufficiently notable. (ETA: also note the 1938 reference saying the population is 12.) There are many old newspaper references to the community, but those are more the variety of "Bill Joe of Van Petten came to Dixon today", so i didn't want to pollute the references with that.--Milowent • ^{has spoken} 13:56, 23 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Which notability guideline do you believe this meets? Van Petten doesn't appear in 2012 Illinois Counties and Incorporated Municipalities, and it's not clear what this "town tax" refers to. This really just looks like a single couple who was keeping the idea of a "town" alive for sentimental purposes. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be either official recognition or significant coverage to meet NPLACE or GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 15:33, 23 July 2026 (UTC) reply

I have continued to improve the article and feel comfortable stating I am now an expert in the complete history of Van Petten, Illinois. As a self-appointed expert, you will unable to sway my !vote. Seriously though, i think there's a fair case for showing it was an informally recognized small community that started in 1901 and that had largely died by the late 1930s. The plat was not vacated until 2024. I still don't know what the town tax is, so my expertness is perhaps incomplete.--Milowent • ^{has spoken} 21:38, 23 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Weak Keep. The sources identified by Milowent are certainly enough for a redirect and I think just enough to keep a stand alone article. Eluchil404 (talk) 20:26, 25 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:47, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Keep - Milowent's sources are more than enough to pass NPLACE. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 01:58, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Nom comment - Crisco 1492, I meant to say something before the week was up but I'd support a Keep close since the article's been expanded. Feel free to un-relist and close. –dlthewave ☎ 00:58, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Master of Chinese Medicine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

I cannot find anything other than the primary sources. Jerod Lycett (talk) 08:30, 18 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related AfD discussions. Jerod Lycett (talk) 08:30, 18 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of China-related AfD discussions. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:53, 18 July 2026 (UTC) reply

There are at least 2 third-party sources, one published by the national newspaper People's Daily, the other by The Paper (newspaper), a Shanghai newspaper. Ctxz2323 (talk) 13:41, 18 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Those are both owned and run by the government, which is who gives out the award. Jerod Lycett (talk) 22:15, 18 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Two sources are added, including a third-party English source. Ctxz2323 (talk) 20:35, 18 July 2026 (UTC) reply

All sources are Chinese-government owned, no matter the language. The government gives out the award. You need sources that are independent as well as reliable and providing significant coverage. Jerod Lycett (talk) 22:16, 18 July 2026 (UTC) reply

They are of different departments and regions. And the "World Federation of Chinese Medicine Societies" is a large, international academic organization, not owned by the government. Ctxz2323 (talk) 08:14, 19 July 2026 (UTC) reply

By the way, China is a socialist country, there are few popular media entities not owned by the state. Ctxz2323 (talk) 08:21, 19 July 2026 (UTC) reply

In the context of China's media landscape where nearly all publications have a connection to the state, I agree that these sources are sufficient to establish notability. Requiring sources with no connection to the state would impose a standard that requires international coverage. That sets an unnecessarily high bar that would result in the deletion of numerous China-related topics. Cunard (talk) 07:46, 20 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
  1. Wu, Yuewei 吴跃伟 (2017年06月29日). "第三届国医大师表彰会:选出三十位国医大师和百位全国名中医" [Commendation Ceremony for the Third Group of Masters of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Thirty Masters of TCM and One Hundred Nationally Renowned TCM Practitioners Selected]. The Paper (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2026年07月20日. Retrieved 2026年07月20日.

     The article notes: "澎湃新闻(www.thepaper.cn)从国家中医药管理局获悉,6月29日下午,人力资源社会保障部、国家卫生计生委和国家中医药管理局在北京京西宾馆联合举办国医大师、全国名中医表彰大会,授予王世民等人"国医大师"荣誉称号,享受省部级先进工作者和劳动模范待遇;授予丁书文等人"全国名中医"荣誉称号,追授高上林全国名中医荣誉称号。目前,国医大师评选表彰已开展三届,共评选表彰了90名国医大师,而全国名中医评选表彰是首次开展。据悉,这次国医大师和全国名中医评选注重面向基层和临床一线。经自下而上、逐级推荐和"两审三公示"等评选程序,评选出30名国医大师和100名全国名中医。"

     From Google Translate: "The Paper (www.thepaper.cn) has learned from the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine that on the afternoon of June 29, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, the National Health and Family Planning Commission, and the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine jointly held a commendation ceremony at the Jingxi Hotel in Beijing. At the event, the honorary title of "Master of Traditional Chinese Medicine" was conferred upon Wang Shimin and others, entitling them to the same benefits as provincial- and ministerial-level model workers; the honorary title of "National Renowned TCM Practitioner" was conferred upon Ding Shuwen and others, while the late Gao Shanglin was posthumously awarded the same title. To date, the selection and commendation of "Masters of Traditional Chinese Medicine" have been conducted three times, honoring a total of 90 individuals, whereas the selection and commendation of "National Renowned TCM Practitioners" was held for the first time. It is reported that the selection process for these honors prioritized practitioners working at the grassroots level and on the clinical front lines. Through a selection process involving bottom-up recommendations at every level, as well as a procedure of "two reviews and three public announcements," 30 Masters of Traditional Chinese Medicine and 100 National Renowned TCM Practitioners were selected."

  2. Qin, Quan 秦泉, ed. (2016). 大国医 30位国宝级"国医大师"的养生绝活 [Great Masters of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Wellness Secrets of 30 National-Level "Grandmasters of TCM"] (in Chinese). Jiangxi: Jiangxi Science and Technology Press [zh]. ISBN 978-7-5390-5856-6 . Retrieved 2026年07月20日 – via Google Books.

     The article notes: "中医药管理局联合举办的首届"国医大师"表彰暨《国务院关于扶持和促进中医药事业发展的若干意见》座谈会在北京隆重召开。30位从事中医(包括民族医药)临床工作的老专家获得了"国医大师"荣誉称号。这是新中国成立以来,我国政府第一次在全国范围内评选国家级中医大师。这次评选出来的国医大师都年事已高,平均年龄85岁,最大的裘沛然教授已96岁高龄,最小的张学文教授也过了古稀之年。他们个个身怀绝技,行医制药都在55年以上,或独创医术,或研制出以自己名字命名的药剂,代表着"

     From Google Translate: "A grand conference was held in Beijing to honor the first group of "Grandmasters of Traditional Chinese Medicine" (TCM) and to discuss the State Council's "Opinions on Supporting and Promoting the Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine." Thirty senior experts engaged in clinical TCM practice (including ethnic medicine) were awarded the honorary title of "Grandmaster of Traditional Chinese Medicine." This marked the first time since the founding of the People's Republic of China that the government conducted a nationwide selection of national-level TCM grandmasters. The selected grandmasters are all of advanced age, with an average age of 85; the oldest, Professor Qiu Peiran, is 96, while the youngest, Professor Zhang Xuewen, is also over 70. Each possesses exceptional medical skills and has over 55 years of experience in clinical practice and pharmaceutical formulation; they have either pioneered unique medical techniques or developed medicinal preparations named after themselves, representing..."

  3. "Dadi Weekly article". 大地双周刊 [Dadi Weekly] (in Chinese). 2009. p. 32. Retrieved 2026年07月20日 – via Google Books.

     The article notes: "国医大师的头衔对我来说,已经没有什么意义,但是对中医来说,意义重大。这是从国家层面上为中医振兴打气,树立中医标杆,给后人 ... 中医药管理局联合决定在全国选五百名老中医药专家为指导老师,每人配备一至二名理论与实际均有一定基础的中年助手,以师承面授方式继承。当年 10 月,北京人民大会堂,首届全国继承老医药专家学术经验拜师大会隆重举行。随后,包括此次评选出的 30 名国医大师在内, 500 多位名老中医们担起了"全国老中医药专家学术经验继承工作指导"

     From Google Translate: "The title of "Master of Traditional Chinese Medicine" holds little personal significance for me, yet it is of immense importance to the field of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) itself. It represents a national-level initiative to boost the revitalization of TCM, establish benchmarks for the profession, and pave the way for future generations... The Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine jointly decided to select 500 veteran TCM experts nationwide to serve as mentors; each was assigned one or two mid-career assistants—who already possessed a solid foundation in both theory and practice—to facilitate knowledge transfer through direct apprenticeship and face-to-face instruction. That October, a grand ceremony was held at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing to mark the launch of this national program for inheriting the academic expertise of veteran TCM experts. Subsequently, more than 500 renowned veteran TCM practitioners—including the 30 individuals designated as "Masters of Traditional Chinese Medicine" in this selection process—took on the role of guiding the inheritance of academic expertise..."

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Master of Chinese Medicine (simplified Chinese: 国医大师; traditional Chinese: 國醫大師; pinyin: Guóyī Dàshī) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 07:46, 20 July 2026 (UTC) reply

  The first is not independent. The second and third seem to only be trivial coverage, not significant. All the sources need to be all of reliable, independent, and significant coverage. Having one that is significant and another that is indepedent does not make for the qualification. Jerod Lycett (talk) 11:07, 25 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Well done!

Many thanks! Ctxz2323 (talk) 14:40, 20 July 2026 (UTC) reply

You're welcome! Thank you for creating this article! Cunard (talk) 09:45, 21 July 2026 (UTC) reply

State-run media cannot be independent of state-run awards. So they are not independent. Also provided does not qualify for significant coverage. So they fail 2/3 requirements. Jerod Lycett (talk) 01:54, 21 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline says:

"Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.

These sources all address "the topic directly and in detail" so are sufficient to meet the requirement. I've responded above about why I consider the sources to be sufficiently independent. Cunard (talk) 09:45, 21 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Normnation withdraw. Reasons: According to the History records, the nominator made large scale editing on the article after normnating it for deletion, including removing a great majority of the text and rating the article as a stub. I understand it as an intention to keep the article by improvement. Thanks for the efforts to "save" the article!

Ctxz2323 (talk) 07:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) reply

More information for reference: "16:11, 18 July 2026 Significa liberdade marked the article Master of Chinese Medicine as reviewed". Ctxz2323 (talk) 08:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Removing promotional material that is against the PaG is not an attempt to save it. Nor is putting a maintenance tag, such as a stub tag. As for the marking it as reviewed, part of WP:NPP is putting articles up for AfD as part of reviewing them. It's basically only stating that the article isn't pure vandalism or promotional. Further, removing promotional material does not at all address the main reason the article is at AfD: It lacks independent sources. To compare: both Friendship Medal (China) and State Natural Science Award (China) have multiple sources that are not from the government nor state-owned media. The medal even has international coverage. If you cannot find independent sources, then it fails to meet the standards of the English Wikipedia. Jerod Lycett (talk) 11:01, 25 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:32, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:46, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

St. Francis of Assisi Convent High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:07, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Gujarat. Shellwood (talk) 13:36, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related AfD discussions. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Additional searches yielded numerous false positives. Scavenging through them, I didn't find anything with SIGOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 00:50, 27 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Has a previous AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Francis of Assisi Convent, and thus not a candidate for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:45, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Delete Fails NSCHOOL. Only primary sourced provided. LibStar (talk) 01:38, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Ansariyan Publications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

I was unable to find any sources that help notability, though I did not search in Persian. A lot of citations to books they have published and nothing else. As far as I am aware, fails WP:GNG/WP:NCORP. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:23, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Comment. As PARAKANYAA rightly points out, the English sources here fail and just point back to the publisher's own catalog. Deleting a longstanding Iranian publisher without checking Persian sources is maybe a gap. Charlie Zachary Allen Roth (talk) 03:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC) reply

  I mean I tried, but searching in the Persian writing system is difficult for me. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Islam, and Iran. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:23, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC) reply

I agree with @Charlie Zachary Allen Roth's comment. It probably shouldn't be deleted without someone checking. You could ask some of these people: Category:Iranian Wikipedians.

Thanks, -- LightningThrower (talk) 16:44, 31 July 2026 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seems to be a general sense that there may be sources in Farsi. Relisting in case any can be found.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Seemanta Engineering College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. most of the sources on this page currently are rankings Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:23, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Engineering, and Odisha. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:57, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Princess Amalie of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

Subject lacks notability beyond her genealogy (WP:NOTGENEALOGY) and search results (along with looking at other language articles) yield nothing to establish notability either, and the one source that is cited for this page is deprecated. The best option I think would be to redirect to her husband or father's article. OliviaRigby (talk) 00:23, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Royalty and nobility, and Germany. OliviaRigby (talk) 00:23, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Topla Primary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:21, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and West Bengal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:58, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Bishop Morrow School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:21, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Christianity, and West Bengal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Government Autonomous College, Rourkela (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Odisha. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:00, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

Government College of Engineering, Kalahandi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Engineering, and Odisha. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:01, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Propose Deleting Category:Name changes due to the George Floyd protests

Nominator's rationale: the spirit of WP:SHAREDNAME, WP:NOTDICTIONARY, and WP:NONDEFINING

During 2020, a number of institutions revisited the racist meanings behind their long established names and finally updated them to be more representative. The old name is often in the intro with maybe a sentence on the rename but that doesn't seem defining as the actual topics have nothing in common creating a jumble of articles unlikely to aid navigation. This includes the Thick-billed longspur bird (née McCown's longspur), Hotel 24 South (Stonewall Jackson Hotel), America's Best Chew (Redman Chewing Tobacco), The Chicks (Dixie Chicks), Edy's Pie (Eskimo Pie), John R. Lewis High School (Robert E. Lee High School), and Wunaamin Miliwundi Ranges (King Leopold Mountains). This could still work if we had enough articles specifically on the name changes but we only have Cleveland Indians name and logo controversy and Washington Redskins name controversy while the third one, 2020 Rhode Island Question 1, doesn't mention Mr. Floyd. We already have List of name changes due to the George Floyd protests for any reader interested in this topic. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Propose Deleting Category:Edinburgh Festival performers

• Propose Deleting Category:Edinburgh Comedy Festival

Nominator's rationale: textbook WP:PERFCAT and WP:NONDEFINING

Greg Davies, Hannah Gadsby, and Space Cowboy are stars who have performed in many venues, including the the Edinburgh Festival Fringe. In practice, the comedy subcategory is also a performance category which is not remotely defining for Joan Rivers, John Hegley, or Imran Yusuf. No objections to list articles but this leads to category clutter because prominent performers are prominent because they get booked for many performances. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:09, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Varsha Mahender Sabhnani → Muttontown, New York#History (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget /delete ]

There isn't a person named "Varsha Mahender Sabhnani". As indicated by the cited sources, there were actually two people, named "Varsha Sabhnani" and "Mahender Sabhnani". So I suggest deletion. Duckmather (talk) 01:12, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Welcome to Duloc → Shrek (soundtrack) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget /delete ]

Not sure why this song title redirects to an album of which "Welcome to Duloc" is not a part. Perhaps it would be a better idea to change this to the main film article instead, but to play it safe I'd rather get others' opinions first. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 01:02, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

As a matter of fact, the word "Duloc" isn't even mentioned in the article. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 01:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC) reply

• Wikipedia deletion

• Pages transcluding nonexistent sections
• CS1 Chinese-language sources (zh)
• CS1 uses Chinese-language script (zh)