User talk:Deltaspace42

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves }} to send this message

BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

I think I see how I (accidentally but stupidly!) wiped out a huge part of he Planet Money page now. It ws a bad error compounded by me failing to do a final review of the post-edited page. I'm mortified but learned a lesson. Thanks again for your assistance and kindness. I've since gone back and made the edit I was intending (to expand a section). Bookisher (talk) 18:30, 1 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

– CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 11:30, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hi, I’ve noticed that some content in the "Promotion" section has been removed multiple times. The information is supported by the sources already cited in that section, which I have not removed or altered. I would appreciate it if editors could review the existing references before deleting any content. Thank you. ~2025-42862-24 (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

@~2025-42862-24, if you are talking about Bad Girls (Mónica Naranjo album) article, you added information such as "Naranjo recorded Bad Girls under pressure from Sony with limited creative control and felt that the album was not truly hers" and didn't provide reliable sources for it. Where you put references, they are missing URLs or outright broken, or don't support statements you added. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:37, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Did you eben read all 10 artikles? its literally on the artikles, please read them before undoing work when you dont eben speak spanish. you eben deleted proper released dates soursed. what are u doing

https://www.hola.com/actualidad/20191001150518/monica-naranjo-habla-enfermedad-hermano/

Please, do ur reasearh before. the sourses u mean are broken but the ones at the bottom refrense it ~2025-42862-24 (talk) 15:40, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

@~2025-42862-24, in any case, you should provide inline citations for each sentence or paragraph, so it's clear which source supports which statement, not just drop a bunch of links at the end of your text. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:52, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

@~2025-42862-24, you also added unsourced information on Palabra de Mujer (album), I've reverted your edits there. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:59, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Trying to find a ref you put in this diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meshcore&diff=cur&oldid=1331266760

Specifically: Gómez, R.; Martínez, L. (2024). "Routing Strategies for LoRa-Based Mesh Networks". Proceedings of the International Conference on Low Power Wide Area Networks. IEEE. pp.112–118.

Do you have a link to it? I can't find it. Not sure "International Conference on Low Power Wide Area Networks" is even a thing. Evvekk (talk) 01:58, 26 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

@Evvekk, hello! My only edit there was to put the tag: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meshcore&diff=prev&oldid=1333267613 Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 07:09, 26 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

My bad dog, completely mis-read the history! Evvekk (talk) 00:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hi Deltaspace42, I recently made an edit to the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Gritton to remove her date and location of birth. I am a relation of hers and this change was at her request for more privacy. I believe you reverted my change assuming it was vandalism. Please could you undo your change so that information is removed? Thanks! ~2026-50603-8 (talk) 10:56, 28 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

@~2026-50603-8, hello! Her date and location of birth is available on many websites now, so it is impossible to remove it: https://www.bach-cantatas.com/Bio/Gritton-Susan.htm, https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0342690/, etc. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 11:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC) Reply

Just because you dont think something is true doesnt give you the right to delete my edit. You could ask me to take it down or ask for permission of doing so. Do your own research before deleting stuff you dont think is true. Fact checking is a thing? And its sad because you are part of many editing divisions in Wikipedia. Now i will ask nicely, please put my edit back. F16. Eminem415 (talk) 13:18, 8 February 2026 (UTC) Reply

@Eminem415, hello.

Just because you dont think something is true doesnt give you the right to delete my edit - I don't think that the information in your edit was false, but it was not backed up by a reliable source, so I reverted your edit.

You could ask me to take it down or ask for permission of doing so - you don't own the content or articles on Wikipedia and anyone can boldly edit them. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:29, 8 February 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hello, thank you for the guidance.

I understand the user page guidelines and have now edited my user page to comply with them. I appreciate you taking the time to point this out.

Regards, Duduejendhfjdj (talk) 10:39, 23 February 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hello Deltaspace42, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Amicable.io, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:36, 24 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

@Whpq, hello! I tagged the page which contained promotional content: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Amicable.io&oldid=1345123384, the user then edited it to look not promotional. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 12:39, 24 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

Yes, I saw the history. -- Whpq (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

How don't you find changing the religion of a real life character to another religion just to push a narrative not a propaganda? I saw you were quick to edit my change then why not do the same to page Dhurandhar: The revenge? On what basis had that page editing been locked and dhurandhar had been tagged as propaganda then? Just showing true events in brighter lights? Dg bouti (talk) 15:09, 24 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

@Dg bouti, please review the WP:NPOV policy. Wikipedia editors should not draw their own conclusions (e.g. seeing character's religion change and labeling the film as propaganda). We can only include such claims if a reliable source explicitly identifies the film as propaganda. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:19, 24 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

Is this sufficient ? NFFC official X Account dated 30/03/26

"All at Nottingham Forest are saddened to learn of the passing of Geoff Vowden.

The forward scored 46 times for the Reds between the years 1959 and 1964.

Everyone at the club’s thoughts are with Geoff’s friends and family at this time. ❤️" ~2026-19012-60 (talk) 20:20, 31 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

@~2026-19012-60, hello! Yes, I think that's a good source, but I just checked Geoff Vowden, and other editors already added his death with two other sources. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 20:24, 31 March 2026 (UTC) Reply

jan Manisijun (Magnesium) (talk) (contribs) 13:33, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hi. I'm confused about the cropped image issue for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stimulated_Emission.svg. That page looks cropped as does the image in Laser#Stimulated_emission and Stimulated_emission#Overview. But this page looks correct: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/09/Stimulated_Emission.svg Do you have any suggestions? Johnjbarton (talk) 18:43, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

@Johnjbarton: I see the correct image on the linked articles. Please try clearing the cache in your browser (by pressing shift+F5 or another method). Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 19:32, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

Indeed! Thanks and sorry to bother you. Johnjbarton (talk) 19:53, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Reply

• United States Soccer Federation (1930-1934)
  United States Soccer Federation (1930-1934)
• This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed.
  This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed.
• United States Soccer Federation (1934-1936)
  United States Soccer Federation (1934-1936)
• This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed.
  This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed.
• United States Soccer Federation (1950)
  United States Soccer Federation (1950)
• This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed. I think the typeface being used is Univers.
  This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed. I think the typeface being used is Univers.
• United States Soccer Federation (1950)
  United States Soccer Federation (1950)
• Issues: Curved edges when they should be sharp. The typeface I think is Eurostile.
  Issues: Curved edges when they should be sharp. The typeface I think is Eurostile.
• United States Soccer Federation (1950)
  United States Soccer Federation (1950)
• This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed.
  This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed.
• United States national soccer team (1984-1986)
  United States national soccer team (1984-1986)
• This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed. Helvetica should be used if the right typeface can't be found.
  This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed. Helvetica should be used if the right typeface can't be found.
• United States national soccer team (1984-1986, alternate)
  United States national soccer team (1984-1986, alternate)
• This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed. Helvetica should be used if the right typeface can't be found.
  This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed. Helvetica should be used if the right typeface can't be found.

Just your opinion about the vectorization of these logos. I tried to get them vectorized outside Wikimedia projects and it didn't go as planned. I meant I tried to get an outside graphist to vectorize it and he completely botched it. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 20:53, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

@Candidyeoman55, hello! I uploaded a new version of File:United States Soccer Federation logo (1950, official).svg, please take a look. I will probably vectorize some other logos in the future. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 20:49, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

Thank you! Candidyeoman55 (talk) 21:02, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Reply

kot

Kyomkx9978 (talk) 23:01, 19 July 2026 (UTC) Reply