Wikipedia:Requested moves
- العربية
- Azərbaycanca
- تۆرکجه
- বাংলা
- Башҡортса
- Беларуская
- Беларуская (тарашкевіца)
- Brezhoneg
- Dansk
- الدارجة
- Deutsch
- Español
- Esperanto
- فارسی
- Français
- Frysk
- 한국어
- Հայերեն
- Hrvatski
- Bahasa Indonesia
- Nederlands
- 日本語
- Norsk bokmål
- پښتو
- Русский
- සිංහල
- Tagalog
- Татарча / tatarça
- Тоҷикӣ
- Türkçe
- Українська
- Tiếng Việt
- 粵語
- 中文
Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Wikipedia. For information on retitling files, categories, and other items, see § When not to use this page .
Before moving a page or requesting a move, please review the article titling policy and the guidelines on primary topics .
Any autoconfirmed user can move a page using the "Move" option in the editing toolbar; see how to move a page for more information. If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page; however, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:
- Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. In such cases, see § Requesting technical moves .
- Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
- A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves . The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus.
- A page should not be moved and a new move discussion should not be opened when there is already an open move request on a talk page. Instead, please participate in the open discussion.
- Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.
Requests are typically processed after seven days. If consensus supports the move at or after this time, a reviewer will perform it. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved". When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time, or closed as "no consensus". See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.
Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.
When not to use this page
Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:
- Making an uncontroversial move – if you can, be bold and do it yourself! If you can't, see § Requesting technical moves .
- Renaming a category – propose the move at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.
- Renaming a stub template – propose the move at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion (because stub templates apply an equivalent category).
- Renaming an image or other file – see Wikipedia:Moving a page § Moving a file page.
- Moves from draft namespace or user space to article space – Unconfirmed users: use the submission wizard . See Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Confirmed users: Move the page yourself.
- Merging two articles – make a request at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers, or be bold and do it yourself.
- Splitting an article – make a request at Wikipedia:Proposed article splits, or be bold and do it yourself.
- Requesting that page histories be merged – list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge.
- Contesting a move request close – use the Wikipedia:Move review process.
Undiscussed moves
Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:
- No article exists at the new target title;
- There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
- It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.
If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move .
Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again. Instead, follow the procedures laid out in § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.
Requesting technical moves
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request a technical move below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
- If this is your first article and you want your draft article moved to the mainspace, please use the submission wizard to submit your draft or user sandbox page for review at Articles for creation instead of listing it here.
- Because you are autoconfirmed, you can move most pages yourself. Do not request technical assistance on this page if you can do it yourself.
- If you need help determining whether it's okay to move the page to a different title, then please follow the instructions at the top of Wikipedia:Requested moves.
- Please make sure you really need technical assistance before making a request here. In particular, if the target page is a redirect back to the source page that has only one revision, you can usually move the page normally.
- To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
- To request a reversion of a recent undiscussed move: Review the guidelines at WP:RMUM of whether a reversion of an undiscussed move qualifies as uncontroversial and if so, edit the Requests to revert undiscussed moves subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page. Note that in some cases, clerks, such as administrators or page movers may determine that your request for a reversion does not pass the criteria and may move the request to the contested section or open a formal requested move discussion for potentially controversial moves on your behalf.
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
- If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page. A bot will automatically remove contested requests after 72 hours of inactivity.
Technical requests
Uncontroversial technical requests
- Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Berlin (3rd nomination) → Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Berlin (2nd nomination) (move · discuss) – It looks like this discussion was mistakenly duplicated. The "3rd nomination" page should be deleted, since this is not the 3rd nomination. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk • edits) 00:10, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- CopperyMarrow15 I requested the G6 - error speedy deletion of that page since I don't think my normal workaround (moving it to userspace without redirect and U1'ing it) is feasible here since it has actual content. It can be moved once it's deleted. Hurricane Zeta C 01:10, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Dark humor → Black comedy Black comedy (currently a redirect back to Dark humor) (move · discuss) – The move from Black comedy to Dark humor may introduce inconsistency with related articles and reliable sources, as "black comedy" is a well-established term in academic and critical usage. Retaining the original title may better support consistency, recognizability, and alignment with commonly used terminology across the encyclopedia. DasKlose (talk) 09:54, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Requests to revert undiscussed moves
Contested technical requests
- Tea for Three (film) (currently a redirect to Tea for Three) → Tea for Three (move · discuss) – Consensus is that Only Fools and Horses episodes should all be redirected. However, I would like to free up the title "Tea for Three" for the lost film as the primary topic, and give it a hatnote for the OFaH episode. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:10, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- @TenPoundHammer Can you link to me the where the consensus is? veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 19:54, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- For the time being, I'm going to object to this move. In this current state this seems to be a controversial primary topic grab. I'd feel more comfortable moving this once there's consensus for not only redirecting the episodes, but for cases like this, there is also consensus that the episode is the primary topic over the film. This may require a RM.
- Also, from what I see, you're a page mover already. Any reason why you're requesting technical help when you seem to be capable of moving it already? veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 20:03, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- There is a thread at Talk:Only Fools and Horses which was started yesterday, suggesting that the articles should be BLARed. I don't think "consensus" is quite the word I would use to describe it at this point. 162 etc. (talk) 20:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yeah, I saw that one and I agree, it doesn't seem like a consensus really, or a strong one at that. veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 21:06, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- @162 etc.: @Veko: The consensus was reached on Talk:The Green Green Grass to redirect that series' episodes. As Green Green Grass is a sister series to Only Fools and Horses, the consensus seems to be consistent among the related shows. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:37, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- It appears that you've gone ahead with the BLAR. Although my first instinct would be to wait while consensus forms at Talk:Only Fools and Horses, I won't object to that.
- User:Veko correctly points out that as a pagemover, you don't need WP:RMT to move any of this for you. 162 etc. (talk) 03:10, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- @162 etc.: Is there something I'm missing preventing me from doing it myself? Because as of right now, I get an error message when I try. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:03, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- 1. Tea for Three → Tea for Three (disambiguation)
- 2. Tea for Three (film) → Tea for Three
- 3. Clean up the incoming links 162 etc. (talk) 04:52, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- TIL I can do that. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:04, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- @162 etc.: Is there something I'm missing preventing me from doing it myself? Because as of right now, I get an error message when I try. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:03, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- @162 etc.: @Veko: The consensus was reached on Talk:The Green Green Grass to redirect that series' episodes. As Green Green Grass is a sister series to Only Fools and Horses, the consensus seems to be consistent among the related shows. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:37, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yeah, I saw that one and I agree, it doesn't seem like a consensus really, or a strong one at that. veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 21:06, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- There is a thread at Talk:Only Fools and Horses which was started yesterday, suggesting that the articles should be BLARed. I don't think "consensus" is quite the word I would use to describe it at this point. 162 etc. (talk) 20:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Administrator needed
- Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present) → Hezbollah–Israel conflict (2023–present) Hezbollah–Israel conflict (2023–present) (currently a redirect back to Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present)) (move · discuss) – Per consensus at Special:Permalink/1331237403#Requested move 31 December 2025. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 23:59, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves
The discussion process is used for potentially controversial moves. A move is potentially controversial if either of the following applies:
- there has been any past debate about the best title for the page;
- someone could reasonably disagree with the move.
Use this process if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested. For technical move requests, such as to correct obvious typographical errors, see Requesting technical moves . The technical moves procedure can also be used for uncontroversial moves when the requested title is occupied by an existing article.
Do not create a new move request when one is already open on the same talk page. Instead, consider contributing to the open discussion if you would like to propose another alternative. Multiple closed move requests may be on the same page, but each should have a unique section heading.
Do not create a move request to rename one or more redirects. Redirects cannot be used as current titles in requested moves.
Requesting a single page move
To request a single page move, click on the "Add topic" (or "New section") tab of the talk page of the article you want moved, without adding a new subject/header, inserting this code:
{{subst:requested move|New name|reason=Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically.}}
Replace New name with the requested new name of the page (or with a simple question mark, if you want more than one possible new name to be considered). The template will automatically create the heading "Requested move 8 January 2026" and sign the post for you.
There is no need to edit the article in question. Once the above code is added to the Talk page, a bot will automatically add the following notification at the top of the affected page:
Unlike other request processes on Wikipedia, such as Requests for comment, nominations need not be neutral. Make your point as best you can; use evidence (such as Google Ngrams and pageview statistics) and refer to applicable policies and guidelines, especially our article titling policy and the guideline on disambiguation and primary topics.
WikiProjects may subscribe to Article alerts to receive RM notifications. For example, Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Article alerts/Requested moves is transcluded to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography. RMCD bot notifies many of the other Wikiprojects listed on the talk page of the article to be moved to invite project members to participate in the RM discussion. Requesters should feel free to notify any other Wikiproject or noticeboard that might be interested in the move request, as long as this notification is neutral.
Single page move on a different talk page
Occasionally, a move request must be made on a talk page other than the talk page of the page to be moved. For example, a request to rename Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Resources to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing and templates would need to take place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation because the talk page of the project page to be moved, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Resources, is a redirect to that centralized discussion page. In this type of case, the requested move should be made using the following code:
{{subst:requested move|reason=(the reason for the page move goes here).|current1=(present title of page to be renamed)|new1=(proposed title of page)}}
The |1= unnamed parameter is not used. The |current1= and |new1= parameters are used similar to multiple page moves described below.
Requesting multiple page moves
A single template may be used to request multiple related moves. On one of the talk pages of the affected pages, create a request and format it as below. A sample request for three page moves is shown here (for two page moves, omit the lines for current3 and new3). For four page moves, add lines for current4 and new4, and so on. There is no technical limit on the number of multiple move requests, but before requesting very large multi-moves, consider whether a naming convention should be changed first. Discuss that change on the talk page for the naming convention, e.g., Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (sportspeople).
To request a multiple page move, edit at the bottom of the talk page of the article you chose for your request, without adding a new header, inserting this code:
{{subst:requested move | current1 = Current title of page 1 (this parameter can be omitted for discussions hosted on a page that is proposed to be moved) | new1 = New title for page 1 with the talk page hosting this discussion | current2 = Current title of page 2 | new2 = New title for page 2 | current3 = Current title of page 3 | new3 = New title for page 3 | reason = Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically. }}
For example, to propose moving the articles Wikipedia and Wiki, put this template on Talk:Wikipedia with current1 set to Wikipedia and current2 set to Wiki. The discussion for all affected articles is held on the talk page of the article where the template is placed (Talk:Wikipedia). Do not sign the request with ~~~~, since the template does this automatically (so if you sign it yourself there will be two copies of your signature at the end of the request). Do not skip pairs of numbers.
RMCD bot automatically places a notice section on the talk page of all pages that are included in your request except the one hosting the discussion, to call attention to the move discussion that is in progress and to suggest that all discussion for all of the pages included in the request should take place at that one hosting location.
For multi-move discussions hosted on a page which is itself proposed to be moved, it is not necessary to include the |current1=Current title of page 1 for the page hosting the discussion, as its current title can be inferred automatically. Occasionally the discussions for significant multi-move requests may be hosted on WikiProject talk pages or other pages in Project namespace, in which case it is necessary to include |current1= to indicate the first article to be moved.
If you have to update a RM from a single move to multiple moves, you need to add the following parameters to the {{requested move/dated }} template call:
|multiple=yes|current1=Current title of page 1
Request all associated moves explicitly
Please list every move that you wish to have made in your request. For example, if you wish to move Cricket (disambiguation) to Cricket because you do not believe the sport is the primary topic for the search term "Cricket", then you actually want to move two pages, both Cricket (disambiguation) and Cricket. Thus you must list proposed titles for each page affected by your request. For example, you might propose:
If a new title is not proposed for the sport, it is more difficult to achieve consensus for a new title for that article. A move request that does not show what to do with the material at its proposed target, such as:
is incomplete. Such requests may be completed as a request to decide the best new title by discussion.
- Cricket → ?
If a disambiguation page is in the way of a move, the request may be completed as proposing to add (disambiguation).
| Talk page tag | Text that will be shown (and usage notes) |
|---|---|
| {{subst:Requested move|new|reason=why}} links talk edit |
Requested move 8 January 2026
It has been proposed in this section that Wikipedia:Requested moves be renamed and moved to new.
This proposal is for a cross-namespace move from Wikipedia to (Main/Article) namespace. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Wikipedia:Requested moves → new – why Example (talk) 10:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ] |
| {{subst:Requested move|?|reason=why}} |
Requested move 8 January 2026
It has been proposed in this section that Wikipedia:Requested moves be renamed and moved somewhere else, with the name being decided below.
A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log Wikipedia:Requested moves → ? – why Example (talk) 10:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ] |
| {{subst:Requested move|new|reason=why|talk=yes}} |
Requested move 8 January 2026
It has been proposed in this section that Wikipedia:Requested moves be renamed and moved to new.
This proposal is for a cross-namespace move from Wikipedia to (Main/Article) namespace. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Wikipedia:Requested moves → new – why Example (talk) 10:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ] Survey
Discussion
|
| {{subst:Requested move|new1=x|current2=y|new2=z|reason=why}} |
Requested move 8 January 2026
It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.
A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.
– why Example (talk) 10:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ] |
| {{subst:Requested move|new1=?|current2=y|new2=?|reason=why}} |
Requested move 8 January 2026
It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved somewhere else, with the names being decided below.
A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log
– why Example (talk) 10:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ] |
Commenting on a requested move
All editors are welcome to contribute to the discussion regarding a requested page move. There are a number of standards that Wikipedians should practice in such discussions:
- When editors recommend a course of action, they write Support or Oppose in bold text, which is done by surrounding the word with three single quotes on each side, e.g.
'''Support'''. - Comments or recommendations are added on a new bulleted line (that is, starting with *) and signed by adding
~~~~to the end. Responses to another editor are threaded and indented using multiple bullets. - The article itself should be reviewed before any recommendation is made; do not base recommendations solely on the information supplied by other editors. It may also help to look at the article's edit history. However, please read the earlier comments and recommendations, as well as prior move requests. They may contain relevant arguments and useful information.
- Vested interests in the article should be disclosed per Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI.
When participating, please consider the following:
- Editors should make themselves familiar with the article titling policy at Wikipedia:Article titles.
- Other important guidelines that set forth community norms for article titles include Wikipedia:Disambiguation, specific naming conventions, and the manual of style.
- The debate is not a vote; please do not make recommendations that are not sustained by arguments.
- Explain how the proposed article title meets or contravenes policy and guidelines rather than merely stating that it does so.
- Nomination already implies that the nominator supports the name change, and nominators should refrain from repeating this recommendation on a separate bulleted line.[a]
- Do not make conflicting recommendations. If you change your mind, use strike-through to retract your previous statement by enclosing it between <s> and </s> after the bullets, and de-bold the struck words, as in "•
(削除) Support (削除ここまで)Oppose".
Please remember that reasonable editors will sometimes disagree, but that arguments based in policy, guidelines, and evidence have more weight than unsupported statements. When an editor offers an argument that does not explain how the move request is consistent with policies and guidelines, a reminder to engage in constructive, on-topic discussion may be useful. On the other hand, a pattern of responding to requests with groundless opinion, proof by assertion, and ignoring content guidelines may become disruptive. If a pattern of disruptive behavior persists after efforts are made to correct the situation through dialogue, please consider using a dispute resolution process.
Closing a requested move
Any uninvolved editor in good standing may close a move request. Please read the closing instructions for information on how to close a move request. The simple guide to closing RM discussions details how to actually close a requested move discussion. Most requested moves should be open for seven days (168 hours) but can be withdrawn under specific circumstances as per WP:RMEC.
Alternatively, the opener of a discussion can close it only if unanimous opposition is obvious, the requested move has not had any comments yet, or the request was initiated via block evasion. As per WP:WITHDRAW, an opener of a discussion should use strikethrough on the nomination statement when it is prematurely closed through withdrawal.
Relisting a requested move
Relisting a discussion moves the request out of the backlog up to the current day in order to encourage further input. The decision to relist a discussion is best left to uninvolved experienced editors upon considering, but declining, to close the discussion. In general, discussions should not be relisted more than once before properly closing.[b] Users relisting a debate which has already been relisted, or relisting a debate with a substantial discussion, should write a short explanation on why they did not consider the debate sufficient to close. While there is no consensus forbidding participation in a requested move discussion after relisting it, many editors consider it an inadvisable form of supervote. If you want to relist a discussion and then participate in it, be prepared to explain why you think it was appropriate.
Relisting should be done using {{subst:RM relist}}, which automatically includes the relister's signature, and which must be placed at the very end of the initial request after the move requester's signature (and subsequent relisters' signatures).
When a relisted discussion reaches a resolution, it may be closed at any time according to the closing instructions; there is no required length of time to wait before closing a relisted discussion.
If discussion has become stale, or it seems that discussion would benefit from more input of editors versed in the subject area, consider more widely publicizing the discussion, such as by notifying WikiProjects of the discussion using the template {{RM notification }}. Banners placed at the top of the talk page hosting the move request can often be used to identify WikiProjects suitable for notification.
Notes
- ^ A nominator making a procedural nomination with which they may not agree is free to add a bulleted line explaining their actual position. Additional detail, such as sources, may also be provided in an additional bullet point if its inclusion in the nomination statement would make the statement unwieldy. Please remember that the entire nomination statement appears on the list on this page.
- ^ Despite this, discussions are occasionally relisted more than once.
- This section lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.
To make a change to an entry, make the change on the linked talk page.
This list is also available in a page-link-first format and in table format. 50 discussions have been relisted.
January 8, 2026
- (Discuss) – Yahweh → Yahweh (historical) – The unqualified title "Yahweh" is highly controversial as it is simultaneously the common name for the living God of contemporary Abrahamic faiths and the subject of historical-critical scholarship. Moving the historical article allows readers to easily choose between the scholarly topic and the religious topic via disambiguation. Félix An (talk) 07:37, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Wikipedia:Jonas Saul → Jonas Saul – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Mariathegreek79 (talk) 07:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Jovan Todorovic → Jovan Todorović – Correct native Serbian spelling with diacritic (ć). The subject’s name is consistently spelled this way in reliable sources. ~2026-10674 (talk) 13:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:49, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Thalapathy Thiruvizha – Jana Nayagan Audio Launch → Thalapathy Thiruvizha Thalapathy Thiruvizha – Why the new, absurdly long title? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:53, 1 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:48, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Interstate 238 and State Route 238 (California) → Interstate 238 and California State Route 238 Interstate 238 and California State Route 238 – WP:NATURAL and WP:CONSISTENT with other articles on U.S. state routes, which have the state name before "State Route" instead of in parentheses. The current disambiguation could also suggest that another Interstate 238 exists, which it doesn't. Greedycell (talk) 06:38, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Emperor Norton → Joshua Norton Joshua Norton – He wasn't actually an emperor; he merely claimed to be one. Using this name for the article is likely to cause confusion. Coddlebean (talk) 06:18, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Tom Barlow (English footballer) → Tom Barlow (footballer, born 1874) – YOB is preferred over nationality per WP:NCSP. See Talk:Tom Barlow (American soccer)#Requested move 1 January 2026 for a move for the American soccer player of the same name. Raskuly (talk) 05:44, 1 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 06:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Tom Barlow (American soccer) → Tom Barlow (soccer, born 1995) – YOB is preferred over nationality per WP:NCSP. See Talk:Tom Barlow (English footballer)#Requested move 1 January 2026 for a move for the English footballer of the same name. Raskuly (talk) 05:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 06:06, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Sonic the Hedgehog (character) → Sonic (character) Sonic (character) – I think the character is more commonly referred to as simply "Sonic", and several citations in the article also support that usage. On the other hand, it's also better for concision. Also, a thing I noticed is that multiple sources that use "Sonic the Hedgehog" in their titles don't use that term further and just go with the usage of "Sonic" in the rest of the paragraphs. My other point is that searching for "Sonic character" on Google will mainly pop up results related to this character. So, keeping all that in mind, I don't think it would be that much of a problem. Kazama16 (talk) 04:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – 2025 deployment of federal forces in the United States → 2025–2026 deployment of federal forces in the United States 2025–2026 deployment of federal forces in the United States – With the recent shooting in Minnesota a major news event related to and already covered in this article, there's no indication that the events are confined to 2025. This is not the only covered event, and coverage can be reasonably expected to continue, so WP:NOTNEWS does not apply. ~Politicdude (talk, contribs) 03:31, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Sweida → Suwayda Suwayda – WP:COMMONNAME since if you search up "Suwayda" on Google, you would see more of said "Suwayda" then "Sweida". GuesanLoyalist (talk) 00:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC) GuesanLoyalist (talk) 00:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 01:28, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Sweida Governorate → Suwayda Governorate Suwayda Governorate – WP:COMMONNAME since if you search up "Suwayda" on Google, you would see more of said "Suwayda" then "Sweida". GuesanLoyalist (talk) 00:53, 1 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 01:27, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Atlanta Motor Speedway → EchoPark Speedway EchoPark Speedway – As we're less than 12 hours away from 2026 in the est, given how not only the previous request was due to a mutual agreement on it being too soon, but how a quick google search of "atlanta motor speedway" effectively shows it as echopark speedway, nascar's website (and related ones such as the racing experience), along with others like TicketMaster and Explore Georgia, I feel like it's safe to say we can move it to echopark, given how google shows it as the common name. 45BearsFan (talk) 22:13, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 01:23, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Lists of Interstate Highways → Lists of interstate highways – Reason 1: WP:SENTENCECASE. Both "interstate" and "highways" are common adjectives and nouns respectively and should not be capitalized. The Interstate Highway System is exempted since it is the formal name of the highway network. In fact, Wikipedia already makes this distinction with other country’s highway lists versus formal institutions: and National Highways Development Project (since redirected, but the point still stands) – Reason 2: Outside sources. *The United States Army uses lowercase when referring to them generically: "Many Army posts, especially where division-level units are garrisoned, are near interstate highways." *As does the Eisenhower Library: "It was not until June 29, 1956, when President Eisenhower signed the Federal Aid Highway Act, that interstate highways began to meet the challenge of the growing number of automobiles on the nation’s highways." *And the History Channel (for what it's worth): "The law authorized the construction of a 41,000-mile network of interstate highways that would span the nation." – Reason 3: WP:CONSISTENT with existing state highway lists. If this proposal earns consensus, I'll then nominate United States Numbered Highway System lists so that every list of highways in U.S. states will have uniformity. For instance, Kansas would have these lists: *List of state highways in Kansas (already lowercase) Note: When referring to individual interstate highways, the I or interstate before the number would still be capitalized. For example, "The longest interstate highway is Interstate 90, followed by I-80." Woko Sapien (talk) 19:05, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 01:21, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- List of auxiliary Interstate Highways → List of auxiliary interstate highways List of auxiliary interstate highways
- List of future Interstate Highways → List of future interstate highways List of future interstate highways
- List of gaps in Interstate Highways → List of gaps in interstate highways
- List of suffixed Interstate Highways → List of suffixed interstate highways
- List of Interstate Highways in Alabama → List of interstate highways in Alabama
- List of Interstate Highways in Alaska → List of interstate highways in Alaska
- List of Interstate Highways in Arizona → List of interstate highways in Arizona
- List of Interstate Highways in Arkansas → List of interstate highways in Arkansas
- List of Interstate Highways in California → List of interstate highways in California
- List of Interstate Highways in Colorado → List of interstate highways in Colorado List of interstate highways in Colorado
- List of Interstate Highways in Connecticut → List of interstate highways in Connecticut
- List of Interstate Highways in Florida → List of interstate highways in Florida
- List of Interstate Highways in Georgia → List of interstate highways in Georgia
- List of Interstate Highways in Idaho → List of interstate highways in Idaho
- List of Interstate Highways in Illinois → List of interstate highways in Illinois
- List of Interstate Highways in Indiana → List of interstate highways in Indiana
- List of Interstate Highways in Iowa → List of interstate highways in Iowa
- List of Interstate Highways in Kansas → List of interstate highways in Kansas
- List of Interstate Highways in Kentucky → List of interstate highways in Kentucky
- List of Interstate Highways in Louisiana → List of interstate highways in Louisiana
- List of Interstate Highways in Maine → List of interstate highways in Maine
- List of Interstate Highways in Maryland → List of interstate highways in Maryland
- List of Interstate Highways in Massachusetts → List of interstate highways in Massachusetts
- List of Interstate Highways in Michigan → List of interstate highways in Michigan
- List of Interstate Highways in Minnesota → List of interstate highways in Minnesota
- List of Interstate Highways in Mississippi → List of interstate highways in Mississippi
- List of Interstate Highways in Missouri → List of interstate highways in Missouri
- List of Interstate Highways in Montana → List of interstate highways in Montana
- List of Interstate Highways in Nebraska → List of interstate highways in Nebraska
- List of Interstate Highways in Nevada → List of interstate highways in Nevada
- List of Interstate Highways in New Hampshire → List of interstate highways in New Hampshire
- List of Interstate Highways in New Jersey → List of interstate highways in New Jersey
- List of Interstate Highways in New Mexico → List of interstate highways in New Mexico
- List of Interstate Highways in New York → List of interstate highways in New York
- List of Interstate Highways in North Carolina → List of interstate highways in North Carolina
- List of Interstate Highways in North Dakota → List of interstate highways in North Dakota
- List of Interstate Highways in Ohio → List of interstate highways in Ohio
- List of Interstate Highways in Oklahoma → List of interstate highways in Oklahoma
- List of Interstate Highways in Oregon → List of interstate highways in Oregon
- List of Interstate Highways in Pennsylvania → List of interstate highways in Pennsylvania
- List of Interstate Highways in South Carolina → List of interstate highways in South Carolina
- List of Interstate Highways in South Dakota → List of interstate highways in South Dakota
- List of Interstate Highways in Tennessee → List of interstate highways in Tennessee
- List of Interstate Highways in Texas → List of interstate highways in Texas
- List of Interstate Highways in Utah → List of interstate highways in Utah
- List of Interstate Highways in Virginia → List of interstate highways in Virginia
- List of Interstate Highways in Washington → List of interstate highways in Washington
- List of Interstate Highways in Washington, D.C. → List of interstate highways in Washington, D.C.
- List of Interstate Highways in West Virginia → List of interstate highways in West Virginia
- List of Interstate Highways in Wisconsin → List of interstate highways in Wisconsin
- List of Interstate Highways in Wyoming → List of interstate highways in Wyoming
- (Discuss) – United States v. Maduro et al. → ? – The case's name is seemingly in-dispute and likely will not align with WP:COMMONNAME, regardless. Suggested proposals include:• Prosecution of Nicolás Maduro and Cilia Flores• Prosecution of Nicolás Maduro• Prosecution of Nicolás Maduro and associatesObviously you are welcome to supply your own suggestions.Tagging those that have already taken-part in article name discussions @ReyHahn, @Renascitur, @FactOrOpinion, @Voorts; But all participation is welcome. I, personally, don't have a strong opinion as of yet. Cheers, all MWFwiki (talk) 00:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
January 7, 2026
- (Discuss) – Werner Winter (linguist) → Werner Winter – Clearly the WP:PTOPIC as the other name in the disambiguation page is Werner Winter (U-boat commander), whose name links to a list article. Page should be moved and the U-boat commander should be identified with an {{about }} or {{distinguish }} hatnote instead. ThaesOfereode (talk) 15:52, 7 January 2026 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 21:43, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Newbold-on-Avon → Newbold on Avon Newbold on Avon – Per the Ordnance Survey and most other sources. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:22, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Robustness → Robustness (term) – "Robustness" primarily serves as both a dictionary definition and various related subtopics with no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, with the various subtopic pages having more notability than the general term itself. Previous editors unilaterally split the "Robustness" article into the disambiguation page and a broad-concept article, but the latter remains a stub that serves little long-term encyclopedic value for describing the dictionary term. It would more meaningfully serve readers to have the disambiguation page with the generic definitional term and various listed subtopics at the base title. I am also proposing for the history of the original Robustness article to be preserved at "Robustness (term)", which can then be redirected to the new Robustness base article. Red Shogun412 (talk • contribs) 20:34, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – 2025 United States protests against mass deportation → 2025–2026 United States protests against mass deportation – notable continuation in the new year Jeremyb (talk) 20:13, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Billiard hall → Pool hall Pool hall – Seems like a much more common usage. Whilst I know that tables to play billiards include those that play pool, I can't imagine that the most common search for this would be for billiards, rather than pool. I can't see that having an article called "pool hall" will cause issues with billiards tables being included. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:56, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Der Schuh des Manitu → Manitou's Shoe Manitou's Shoe – WP:ENGLISHTITLE Ee100duna (talk) 19:57, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Venda → Venda (Bantustan) – No clear primary topic (or at least the Bantustan is certainly not it). There’s Venda people and Venda language which are commonly just called Venda in English (Vhavenda and Tshivenda in Venda and sometimes English respectively). Was recommended to start an RM at WP:RMT Kowal2701 (talk) 21:16, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Christine Chubbuck → Suicide of Christine Chubbuck – Per WP:BIO1E. Albeit her death is tragic, she's only really known for her death. Almost every source used in this article is related to her death. ⚠︎ ArkadenBoden ⚠︎ (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Electric light → Light bulb Light bulb – Given that the widely-accepted technical terms lamp and electric lamp have (like luminaire) been deemed insufficiently common by the Wikipedia community for use as article titles, I propose that: * the electric light article be moved/renamed such that its title becomes either light bulb (which appears to be more common than the shortened lightbulb), and * the related terms lamp, light, and light source (as well as the explicitly electric versions of these terms) be listed in that article as terms that can refer to a light fixture or one of its light-emitting components (i.e., are not true synonyms for light bulb). The term electric light is recognizable (e.g., as a kind of "artificial" or anthropic light) and concise, but does not satisfy the other criteria for good article titles: * Unnatural – Consider a light fixture that contains multiple light bulbs. If someone asks you to "switch off the light", you probably wouldn't ask which of its light bulbs they're referring to. Some light fixtures have multiple circuits to enable separate switching of their light bulbs, but it typically wouldn't make sense to say "switch off the electric light" if electric light is defined to only mean light bulb. * Imprecise – The term light is ambiguous in that it can refer to visible radiation, a light bulb, or a light fixture. The term electric light is more specific but can still refer to visible radiation (generated using electricity), a light bulb, or a light fixture. * Inconsistent – The existing article titles electric light and light fixture are poorly coordinated. One problem with electric light is that the aforementioned imprecision results in overlapping scope for the two pages. Another issue is its different pattern/structure, namely light fixture (light-emitting fixture) versus electric light (electrically-powered light). In contrast, light bulb would satisfy all of the criteria. I produced the user essay at Jrtuenge/Move electric light to more fully document my rationale; it provides additional explanation and justification for this potentially-controversial requested move. Jrtuenge (talk) 19:06, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Yaren → Yaren district Yaren district – would be nice if we could have a discussion that involves more than just 1 supporter. I'd say, keep the Yaren (disambiguation) page a disambiguation, and redirect Yaren here. If not, move the other districts too. Like Nibok district to Nibok. Jq talk 💬 contributions 17:57, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Sanford Brown (writer) → ? – The subject is professionally and commonly known as "Sandy Brown," which is the name used on published guidebooks, publisher materials (Cicerone Press), public appearances, and external coverage. Wikipedia policy (WP:COMMONNAME) favors the name most commonly used in reliable sources over a legal name. The parenthetical disambiguator distinguishes the subject from Sandra Brown, the American novelist. ~2026-14166-2 (talk) 17:06, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Yankees–Red Sox rivalry → Red Sox–Yankees rivalry Red Sox–Yankees rivalry – Rivalry names should be alphabetical. Probably is an MOS:TITLE issue, but I am not sure for certain, and this is protected from page move, and it is better to discuss these than to not, even if the page wasn't protected from being moved. And according to this: [1], all other rivalries are alphabetically correct. So move. Servite et contribuere (talk) 14:53, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 13:48, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – DLC → DLC (disambiguation) DLC (disambiguation) – To make DLC a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Downloadable content. It's the clear primary topic from pageviews and WikiNav, and DLC is probably the common name for downloadable content anyway, but that's a separate issue. Thanks, Glasspalace (talk • contribs) 06:59, 22 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 07:01, 29 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 12:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Republic of the Congo (Léopoldville) → First Congolese Republic First Congolese Republic – Following on from this discussion, this title appears to make the most sense. Periodisation of Congolese postcolonial history is usually split into post-independence (1960-1965) and Mobutu's rule (1965-1997). The country gained independence as the "Republic of the Congo" in 1960, was renamed "Democratic Republic of Congo" in 1964 (1 year before Mobutu's coup), and then "Zaire" in 1971. The scope of Zaire could be extended back to 1965 (with its first sentence saying
(Democratic Republic of Congo until 1971)
or similar). Proposed title does get some hits on Scholar and Books, and the Encyclopedia of African History uses this periodisation, as does Didier Gongola (but w the terms "First Republic" and "Second Republic") in his book Kowal2701 (talk) 11:21, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Im Yoon-ah → Lim Yoona Lim Yoona – *Same arguments as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yim_Si-wan#Requested_move_9_December_2025 * COMMON NAME in English-laguage sources as seen below, per WP:KOREANNAME: :-Korean Film Council's KoBiz: https://www.koreanfilm.or.kr/eng/kofic/200_actors/Lim_Yoona.jsp :-The Korea Herald: https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10646236 :-Vogue Hong Kong: https://www.voguehk.com/en/article/fashion/lim-yoona-vogue-hong-kong-february-cover/ :-Cosmopolitan PH: https://www.cosmo.ph/kloka/lee-chaemin-yoona-bon-appetit-your-majesty-a5322-20250821-dyn :-ABS-CBN: https://www.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/showbiz/movies-series/2025/7/24/lim-yoona-lee-chae-min-s-bon-app-tit-your-majesty-to-stream-on-netflix-1239 :-Korea JoongAng Daily (with alternative spelling of Lim Yoon-a): https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2025-08-07/entertainment/movies/Lim-Yoona-becomes-innocent-baker-by-day-devil-by-night-in-Pretty-Crazy/2370902 * PERSONAL PREFERENCE as evidenced in her verified / official sites below, per WP:KOREANNAME: :-Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/yoona__lim/# :-Weibo: https://weibo.com/u/5748179271 :-Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/limyoona__official ::Addendum: She titles her videos with "Lim Yoona" ::: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=85J6MoipoA4&pp=0gcJCU0KAYcqIYzv ::: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oYdwWxRao4Y Zoreaux (talk) 04:20, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 07:56, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – 2023 Egyptian presidential election → 2024 Egyptian presidential election 2024 Egyptian presidential election – The official and legally recognized designation by Egypt’s National Election Authority is "2024 Egyptian presidential election". Although the vote physically took place in December 2023, the official title corresponds to the constitutional six-year electoral cycle (2018 → 2024 → 2030), not merely the calendar year of the vote. Using the official 2024 designation ensures consistency with the presidential term, prevents confusion for readers regarding the length of the term, and respects the legal and formal authority of the National Election Authority. There are numerous international precedents where events retained their official names despite occurring in a different year: * Africa Cup of Nations 2021 — held in 2022 * UEFA Euro 2020 — held in 2021 * Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games — held in 2021 * FIFA Club World Cup 2020 — held in 2021 * Copa América 2020 — held in 2021 * AFC Asian Cup 2023 — held in 2024 * Africa Cup of Nations 2023 — held in 2024 These examples demonstrate that keeping the official name is standard practice internationally, especially when it is legally recognized and tied to a fixed cycle. Retaining "2024 Egyptian presidential election" reflects the official designation, maintains chronological consistency, and provides clarity for readers. This approach balances Wikipedia’s naming conventions with factual accuracy and official recognition. Aelrhman2007 (talk) 12:44, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Chhau dance → Chhau – Clear primary topic. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 13:02, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Chhau → Chhau (disambiguation) Chhau (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary
- (Discuss) – Goma Air Flight 409 → Summit Air Flight 409 Summit Air Flight 409 – I want to settle what the article should be called since the airline name had been changed around the time the aircraft crashed. Zaptain United (talk) 15:13, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – UTair Flight 579 → Utair Flight 579 Utair Flight 579 – The airline changed their name on 31 October 2017. The article name was changed by a sockpuppet, but I want to make sure that this was the actual airline name at the time. Zaptain United (talk) 15:29, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Ewa District, Nauru → Ewa district – I think this page should be moved to Ewa district. ʻEwa District, Hawaii is 'Ewa, not Ewa. Jq talk 💬 contributions 03:42, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – The Digger (alternative magazine) → The Digger (Australian magazine) – No indication that the Scottish magazine is primary over the Australian magazine. The Digger should redirect to the Digger#Literature disambiguation page where both are already listed. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:15, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Good Morning Britain → Good Morning Britain (disambiguation) Good Morning Britain (disambiguation) – I think this programme might be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Based on the 2025 pageviews and recent pageviews alone, this article averages more pageviews than all the other articles combined, so it seems most people are looking for this programme. Additionally, this programme is now approaching its 12th year now, longer than the 1983 one, which was on for just under 10 years. Limmidy (talk) 01:57, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – I'm a Boss (song) → Ima Boss Ima Boss – "Ima Boss" appears to be the most commonly used version of the title in reliable sources and is used for the digital single and the remix. Hell, even the cited sources in the article refer to it as "Ima Boss". Red Shell Momentum 01:20, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Anthony Wong → Anthony Wong (disambiguation) Anthony Wong (disambiguation) – I propose that Anthony Wong (Hong Kong actor) should be the primary topic and that the disambiguator should be dropped. Currently, there are three entries at Anthony Wong: Anthony Wong (Hong Kong actor), Anthony Wong Yiu-ming, and Anthony Brandon Wong. Firstly, I do not think the page names are ambiguous at all. Anthony Wong Yiu-ming and Anthony Brandon Wong are typically referred to by their full names in RS, while only Anthony Wong the Hong Kong actor is commonly referred to as just Anthony Wong. (For Anthony Wong Yiu-ming, see Reuters,[2], The New York Times ,[3], and South China Morning Post .[4] For Anthony Brandon Wong, see SBS Australia,[5], Australian Broadcasting Corporation,[6], and The West Australian .[7] For Anthony Wong (Hong Kong actor), see BBC,[8], Time magazine ,[9], Wall Street Journal ,[10], and South China Morning Post.[11]) According to WP:SMALLDETAILS, the proper approach would be to add a hatnote at Anthony Wong that directs to Anthony Wong Yiu-ming and Anthony Brandon Wong instead of having a separate disambiguation page. Setting aside the article title naming conventions, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC outlines two criteria for determining primary topics: usage and long-term significance. Regarding usage, in 2025, the yearly views for Anthony Wong (Hong Kong actor), Anthony Wong Yiu-ming, and Anthony Brandon Wong were 113,974, 5,985, and 20,392 respectively. The Hong Kong actor's views far exceed those of the other two Anthonys by about 19 times and 5 times. Regarding long-term significance, the Hong Kong actor is the first individual to win a Grand Slam (the largest awards for film, television, and theatre in Hong Kong) and is a four-time winner of the Golden Horse Awards (also referred to as the Oscars of Asia), and his career in Asia had even propelled him to Hollywood. With all due respect to the other two Anthonys, I believe the Hong Kong actor possesses much stronger notability and is more likely to be the subject readers expect to find when searching for "Anthony Wong". Therefore, considering all three reasons above, I believe there is a strong case for making Anthony Wong (Hong Kong actor) the primary topic. —👑 PRINCE of EREBOR 📜 00:37, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Kevin Aguilar → Kevin Aguilar (mixed martial artist) – Per pageviews, it is not clear that this is primary over Kevin Aguilar (singer). If it is primary, then Kevin Aguilar (disambiguation) will need to be deleted because the third entry is a subtly different name: Kevin Aguiar. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:10, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – History of ancient Israel and Judah → Ancient Israel and Judah Ancient Israel and Judah – "History of" implies that there is a parent article titled "Ancient Israel and Judah", which is itself a redirect. Current title is too precise and can be described with the requested title. Yovt (talkvt) 00:02, 7 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
January 6, 2026
- (Discuss) – Prasat Ta Krabey → Prasat Ta Khwai Prasat Ta Khwai – This is a procedural Requested Move to resolve a naming dispute that has resulted in move-warring. See previous discussion on this talk page. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:26, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – NN Running Team → DSM-Firmenich Running Team – DSM-Firmenich is title sponsor since 2026, see here Thalhamm (talk) 21:20, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – AmaMpondomise → Mpondomise people Mpondomise people – @Mtanomhle kaXhosa: Consistency with related articles, move undiscussed. Arctic Circle System (talk) 02:47, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 20:26, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – SRT Light Red Line → Light Red Line (Bangkok) – The main reason for the move request is for consistency with most other articles of operational electric train lines in Bangkok Metropolitan Region: * Blue Line (Bangkok) * Purple Line (Bangkok) * Yellow Line (Bangkok) * Pink Line (Bangkok) * Gold Line (Bangkok) With notable exceptions of: * Airport Rail Link (Bangkok): currently doesn't have a designated name in the form of "<color name> Line". * Sukhumvit Line and Silom Line: There's a consensus against moving these to Light Green Line (Bangkok) and Dark Green Line (Bangkok), see Talk:Sukhumvit_Line#Requested_move_21_December_2025. Personally I don't see any reason to use disambiguation word "SRT" over "(Bangkok)" when the latter is used instead of MRT Blue Line, MRT Purple Line, MRT Yellow Line and MRT Pink Line. Thus, I think that moving SRT Light Red Line and SRT Dark Red Line to Light Red Line (Bangkok) and Dark Red Line (Bangkok) might be a good idea. Jothefiredragon🐲talk🔥contributions🧨log✨mail🐉global 17:01, 30 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 20:26, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – HMO (disambiguation) → HMO HMO – No clear primary topic, Health maintenance organization has 2,675 views but Methyl orange has 2,006, House in multiple occupation has 1,012, Hermosillo International Airport has 674, Human milk oligosaccharide has 593, Hiri Motu language has 390, Hermanus Magnetic Observatory has 7 and Hückel molecular orbital method has 2[Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:07, 30 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 20:25, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Tatar nationalism → Volga Tatar nationalism – This appears to be specifically related to the Volga Tatars rather than any sort of pan-Tatar nationalism nor that of other Tatar ethnic groups. The Crimean Tatars in particular have their own history of nationalism. Arctic Circle System (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 20:25, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Kang bed-stove → Kang (heated platform) – More standard and accurate way of disambiguating the article. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:44, 30 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 19:31, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Dunkin' Donuts → Dunkin' Dunkin' – I've seen this example brought up in a few recent RMs and, since it has been more than three-and-a-half years since the last discussion, I think it is time to revisit this request. According to WP:NAMECHANGES, "we give extra weight to independent, reliable, English-language sources ("reliable sources" for short) written after the name change. If the reliable sources written after the change is announced routinely use the new name, Wikipedia should follow suit and change relevant titles to match." A look at recent news coverage shows Dunkin' is clearly the common name at this point. See stories from The Boston Globe Providence Journal People Masslive.com USA Today WBZ NewsRadio CBS Boston WCVB ABC Philadelphia Parade Today Show Good Morning America Jessintime (talk) 17:07, 30 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 17:53, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Keep On Keepin' On (MC Lyte song) → Keep On Keepin' On (song) Keep On Keepin' On (song) – Only song with a Wikipedia article. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 17:01, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Tropical Storm Mindy → Tropical Storm Mindy (2021) Tropical Storm Mindy (2021) – Not the primary topic. ~2026-11706-0 (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Digital First Media → MediaNews Group MediaNews Group – The company currently seems to primarily use the MediaNews Group branding, including on its website and its printed newspapers. 42-BRT (talk) 18:43, 30 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Twin teammates in sports → Draft:List of twin teammates in sports – This article (which is actually a list and should be moved to "List of twin teammates in sports") is nowhere near ready for publication. Aside from the names column, almost 90% of the cells are empty. It should also have a column indicating on what team or when they were teammates, given that that is the point of the article. It might also be useful to have a column indicating whether they are identical or fraternal. The name column should also be sortable by last name using Template:Sortname. I would have unilaterally made the move to the draftspace but incompleteness didn't appear among WP:DRAFTREASONS. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 15:23, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Sebastian Soto → Sebastian Soto (soccer, born 2000) – Names are identical except for an accent on the first name of the Argentine. Per previous RM such as this example, consensus was that WP:SMALLDETAILS wasn't for cases such as this. Would also require creation of a DAB page RedPatch (talk) 14:00, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – EuroSpin → Eurospin Eurospin – "Eurospin" is the correct name because the official website calls it "Eurospin", not "EuroSpin". ~2026-99669 (talk) 10:03, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – PNY → PNY (disambiguation) PNY (disambiguation) – Clear primary topic and WP:COMMONNAME for the company. The other uses are seldom-used - Pondicherry Airport is typically called that, not "PNY". ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:08, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Czech Republic men's national ice hockey team → Czechia men's national ice hockey team Czechia men's national ice hockey team – The IIHF uses Czechia. The IOC uses Czechia. The NHL uses Czechia. Reliable sources including ESPN, The Athletic/New York Times, and TSN use Czechia. Time for us to catch up. The Kip (contribs) 05:41, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Czech Republic at the 2026 Winter Olympics → Czechia at the 2026 Winter Olympics
- Czech Republic men's national junior ice hockey team → Czechia men's national junior ice hockey team Czechia men's national junior ice hockey team
- Czech Republic men's national under-18 ice hockey team → Czechia men's national under-18 ice hockey team Czechia men's national under-18 ice hockey team
- Czech Republic women's national ice hockey team → Czechia women's national ice hockey team Czechia women's national ice hockey team
- Czech Republic women's national under-18 ice hockey team → Czechia women's national under-18 ice hockey team Czechia women's national under-18 ice hockey team
- (Discuss) – Gary Johnson (footballer, born 1955) → Gary Johnson (football manager) – Far clearer and easier to find. Gary Johnson didn't play professional football and is known for being a manager. Telfordbuck (talk) 16:14, 23 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 04:01, 30 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 04:57, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Basra Federal Region → Basra Region Basra Region – The Kurdistan Region is called the Kurdistan Region and the Sunni Region is called the Sunni Region, so I think the Basra Region should be called the Basra Region for consistency reason. GuesanLoyalist (talk) 08:39, 28 December 2025 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Hurricane Zeta C 00:53, 30 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 04:54, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Mistaken identity → Mistaken identity defense – "Mistaken identity" page speaks of a legal defense claiming witnesses wrongly identified the defendant. Imagine my surprize when I saw this wikilink in A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum. This made me to quickly write a stub Mistaken identity (plot device) and then to slowly go thru Pages that link to "Mistaken identity", to find that 3 dozen (!) mistaken identities are in fact comedy of mistaken identities. Of the remaining backlinks about 100 come from {{Miscarriage of justice }} and of remaining about 50% come from pages where the term actually means "mistaken identification" (wrong animal, wrong ship, wrong killing target, etc.) Bearing in mind that the term "begs for" being wikilinked, I am sure wrong links will continue to proliferate unless we make "Mistaken identity" to be a disambig page. --Altenmann >talk 04:28, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Object sexuality → Objectum sexuality Objectum sexuality – Following concerns from #Category/first paragraph issues and #Misinformation and modernization of terms, Google Trends shows "Objectum sexuality" as more popular wordwidely. The generic title avoids neologism but is itself a term
(削除) devoid of meaning (削除ここまで)ambiguous outside Wikipedia context. WP:OR or a citogenesis? Taking a look to scholar:"object-sexuality", there are sources using it that are still referring to any specific target of attraction, including individual humans (see Subject and object (philosophy)). Abesca (talk) 04:19, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Mageiricophobia → Mageirocophobia – Cited sources indicate different spelling than current article title. Wise-occasionally-tube (talk) 05:25, 30 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 04:03, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Lame duck → Lame duck (disambiguation) Lame duck (disambiguation) – Clear primary topic. Significantly more pageviews than any of the other linked pages combined, and the only other article that comes close, Lame-duck session, is a subtopic of this article. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:35, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Mairéad Farrell → Mairéad Farrell (IRA activist) Mairéad Farrell (IRA activist) – The IRA activist has been the primary (or only) meaning for some time. However her niece is rising in importance, she has been a TD for 5 years, and was re-elected in 2024. The broadcaster is also significant. I suggest that there is now no primary topic. PatGallacher (talk) 02:15, 30 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 02:07, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – WEVR (AM) → WEVR – merged article from WEVR-FM. Both stations air the same programming. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 02:02, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- WEVR → WEVR (disambiguation) WEVR (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary
- (Discuss) – Pastoralia → Pastoralia (short story collection) Pastoralia (short story collection) – No primary topic. Srnec (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
January 5, 2026
- (Discuss) – Manshiya Zabda → Manshiyet Zabda Manshiyet Zabda – As discussed on the Talk page, spellings and pronunciation transliterated as ManshiYET are the standard ones in both Arabic and Hebrew. This page should be renamed to Manshiyet Zabda, with the current name left behind as a redirect. —Moxfyre (ǝɹʎℲxoɯ | contrib) 22:38, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Glynn County mass murder → 2009 Glynn County murders – Event appears to fail WP:NOYEAR requirements due to a lack of notoriety. Remove "mass" from title as similar articles are not titled such a way. See Farmville murders, Kaufman County murders, Broken Arrow murders, etc. Raskuly (talk) 22:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Palestinian genocide accusation → ? – In a previous RM, we had a rare PIA agreement that this name isnt a good name. But there was dispute over which direction to go. Not realizing RM can include multiple options (or none), I made a pre-discussion above, and Cinaroot did in an earlier discussion. There were a few proposals in the earlier RM, which I boiled down in my discussion above, and Ill repropose here, but we are certainly open to other options. * Palestinian genocide allegation (redirects here) or Palestinian genocide allegations * Allegations of genocide against Palestinians (redirects here) * Palestinian genocide question (redirects here) * (something else) Finally, two things to note: the earlier RM found consensus against Palestinian genocide (redirect), and the scope of this article is the "academic" view of the situation 1948-2023. Also, I just found an even earlier RM, which also was against that move. So lets not relitigate that for now. To the closer, I think it would be best to leave this open for the full allowed time unless there is a clear consensus in one direction. ← Metallurgist (talk) 22:07, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – West Freeway Church of Christ shooting → 2019 West Freeway Church of Christ shooting – Event appears to fail WP:NOYEAR requirements. A lack of other notable shootings at this church does not imply that a year is not necessary, factors such as how identifiable the incident does, and this incident does not appear to reach that level of notoriety. Possible alternative of 2019 White Settlement church shooting to make it more similar to incidents like Daingerfield church shooting and Sutherland Springs church shooting. Raskuly (talk) 21:30, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Collierville Kroger shooting → 2021 Collierville Kroger shooting 2021 Collierville Kroger shooting – Event appears to fail WP:NOYEAR requirements. A lack of other notable shootings at Kroger stores in Collierville does not imply that a year is not necessary, factors such as how identifiable the incident does, and this incident does not appear to reach that level of notoriety. Raskuly (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Guasteddra → Guastedda dolce nissena – [13]. New title also here: [14] — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-99241 (talk) 20:00, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Raviola di ricotta di Caltanissetta → Raviola di ricotta nissena Raviola di ricotta nissena – WP: COMMONNAME: [15]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-99241 (talk) 19:47, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – List of mayors of Barisal → Mayor of Barisal Mayor of Barisal – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Loyal luz (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Nee? (Aya Matsuura song) → Nee? Nee? – Per WP:SMALLDETAILS, this should be moved to the base title as this is the only article titled "Nee?" with a question mark. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 18:11, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – (Ghost) Riders in the Sky: A Cowboy Legend → Ghost Riders in the Sky Ghost Riders in the Sky – The sub-title "A Cowboy Legend" does not appear to be in wide use. I didn't find much in the way of sourcing that uses the "A Cowboy Legend" part at the end. Most versions I found are titled "Ghost Riders in the Sky" or "(Ghost) Riders in the Sky". While the Johnny Cash version uses the parentheses around "Ghost", most other versions do not, so I feel "Ghost Riders in the Sky" is the WP:COMMONNAME of this song, unless there is enough of an argument to include the parentheses. At the least, the "A Cowboy Legend" part has to go. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:39, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – American Communist Party (2024) → American Communist Party – Unnecessarily parenthesis, no other pages for "American Communist Party" (ACP) on WP. Original "American Communist Party" disambiguation page has been moved to "American Communist Party (disambiguation)" Peace!ChiruKondo (talk) 03:29, 5 January 2026 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Peace!ChiruKondo (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- American Communist Party → American Communist Party (disambiguation) American Communist Party (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary
- (Discuss) – Motor sport in New Zealand → Motorsport in New Zealand Motorsport in New Zealand – Unification with other articles of this type and Category:Motorsport in New Zealand. Eurohunter (talk) 16:36, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Moenkhausia forestii → Bario forestii – Seems that Eschmeyer's CoF moved this taxon into Bario. We should follow suit. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:25, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – DSA (radio telescope) → Deep Synoptic Array Deep Synoptic Array – Per WP:NATURAL (and two characters more WP:CONCISE). The target title already redirects to this topic. Note that the article was just moved from DSA-2000 DSA-2000 , and there is potential ambiguity with DSA-110 — BarrelProof (talk) 15:54, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Dark Shadows by Marilyn Ross → Dark Shadows (novels) – Title misleads readers. The article discusses the Dark Shadows novel series by Marilyn not the Dark Shadows novel by Marilyn Ross. Thosbsamsgom (talk) 15:20, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Drop (b-boy move) → Drop (breakdancing move) Drop (breakdancing move) – B-boy redirects to Breakdancing so the disambiguation should also use the article name. Gonnym (talk) 15:11, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Float (b-boy move) → Float (breakdancing move) Float (breakdancing move)
- Freeze (b-boy move) → Freeze (breakdancing move) Freeze (breakdancing move)
- Kick (b-boy move) → Kick (breakdancing move) Kick (breakdancing move)
- Spin (b-boy move) → Spin (breakdancing move) Spin (breakdancing move)
- Stab (b-boy move) → Stab (breakdancing move)
- Suicide (b-boy move) → Suicide (breakdancing move) Suicide (breakdancing move)
- Swipe (b-boy move) → Swipe (breakdancing move) Swipe (breakdancing move)
- Windmill (b-boy move) → Windmill (breakdancing move) Windmill (breakdancing move)
- (Discuss) – Boy Scouts of America → Scouting America Scouting America – This organization is called Scouting America, with over a million youth. IdanST (talk) 11:32, 29 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 13:43, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – List of Indian union ministries → List of Indian governments List of Indian governments – Moving the article would make it WP:CONSISTENT with other similar articles, such as List of British governments, List of New Zealand governments, List of Romanian governments, among others. It would also make it clearer for layreaders and those who live outside of commonwealth countries who may not know the definition of the term "ministry" in this context, making it less likely that they'd confuse this article with List of ministries of India. — EarthDude (Talk) 12:09, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – GreenWay → GreenWay (Sydney) GreenWay (Sydney) – @Johnorchard gave me the idea to request this move. When I was creating this page, I focused on using the official name for this trail and not using a disambiguation; but as per WP:OFFICIALNAME, we don't have to use the name this trail is officially known as. The current title is not entirely clear and a possible violation of WP:PRECISE. I was wondering whether I should boldly make this move but I think to gain consensus for a major change like this, proper practice dictates a requested move discussion should be the way forward. I think this is a very good title to use as it is less ambiguous than the current title where only capitalisation resolves conflict between other location names. Qwerty123M (talk) 11:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Artillery Gun Module → Donar artillery system – According to both manufacturer and Wikipedia German - it's called Donar artillery system IdanST (talk) 11:17, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran → Reza Pahlavi (son of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi) – WP:NCROY states that defunct titles of nobility should not be used to name people. The title of "Crown Prince of Iran" is defunct, since the Imperial State of Iran does not meaningfully exist since 1979. The current title is therefore in violation.
Rationale for proposed title: *Per previous discussions, disambiguation is necessary. *The proposed disambiguator identifies the subject uniquely. *There is precedent to identifying nobility by their familial relations in the form of Constans II (son of Constantine III) . One point against this proposal is that reliable sources don't usually describe him as the "son of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi", but rather something along the lines of "the son of Iran's last shah". That's meaningfully the same thing, and I think it's a bit unwieldy. But Reza Pahlavi (son of last Shah of Iran) is my second choice. Dieknon (talk) 11:06, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – REDD and REDD+ → REDD+ REDD+ – The article primarily describes the UNFCCC climate-mitigation framework commonly referred to in reliable sources as REDD+. The current title REDD and REDD+ reads like an explanatory phrase rather than the common name. Per WP:TITLE/WP:COMMONNAME and conciseness, the article should be titled REDD+. The history/terminology section can continue to explain the earlier term REDD. Yourecoveredinbees (talk) 09:26, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Lost Ark (video game) → Lost Ark – This seems to be the clear primary topic with no need for a DAB page. The Ark of the Covenant and Noah's Ark are generally not referred to solely as "Lost Ark". The sources that are there describe it as the "Lost Ark of the Covenant". Thus, any disambiguation attempted would violate WP:PTM. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:26, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Lost Ark → Lost Ark (disambiguation) Lost Ark (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary
- (Discuss) – Online Safety Amendment → Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 – Current title is imprecise. This is not the only Online Safety Amendment in history. In fact, it's not even the only one passed in 2024. There's also the Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill 2024, which doesn't have an article, probably because no one talks about it, but nonetheless make the current title for this article unacceptable. It is not a descriptive title, and feels euphemistic. If the act is to be referred to by a shorter name, I would favour "OSASMMA", "Social Media Minimum Age Act" or "SMMA". But I don't think those are good article titles. In particular, they don't seem to be very commonly-used, particularly "OSASMMA". Grey Clownfish (talk) 11:00, 28 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 07:20, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Abebaw Tadesse Asres → Abebaw Tadesse Abebaw Tadesse – The person is known as Abebaw Tadesse by numerous sources and media (for example [16] [17]), also known for patronymic name, not necessary to put his grandfather name Asres. I think the move is delibratingly disrupting the naming convention of Ethiopia. See WP:COMMONNAME. AsteriodX (talk) 06:19, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Richard Greene (The Younger) → ? – per WP:NCP we shouldn't disambiguate by the use of nicknames. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:07, 22 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 03:11, 29 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Mazda EZ-6 → Mazda 6e Mazda 6e – WP:COMMONNAME, currently Mazda 6e in all markets outside of China. Not stuart60 (talk) 00:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Glenfiddich → Glenfiddich distillery Glenfiddich distillery – The recent move to the current title, "Glenfiddich", was executed unilaterally without any prior discussion or consensus among editors John baost (talk) 12:34, 2 January 2026 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). TarnishedPath talk 00:40, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Surinamese Interior War → Surinamese Civil War Surinamese Civil War – Proposed title is more common reliable sources. Srnec (talk) 00:22, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – *Kóryos → Männerbund Männerbund – Article was rewritten and the title no longer even appears in the lead. I'm proposing to bring the title in line with the article. Srnec (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – David III (disambiguation) → David III David III – No primary topic. Lots of David IIIs. Srnec (talk) 00:15, 5 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
January 4, 2026
- (Discuss) – Coleshill, Warwickshire → Coleshill – This Coleshill has nearly 7,000 residents; the other two less than 600. As the primary topic, I suggest moving to Coleshill --IWI (talk) 22:11, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Coleshill → Coleshill (disambiguation) Coleshill (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary
- (Discuss) – Grid (video game) → Grid (2019 video game) Grid (2019 video game) – Grid is also an alternate name for Race Driver: Grid, and that game is called "Grid" in multiple regions. This is not the sole primary topic, which is why it was initially disambiguated further. The move to remove the year was incorrect and should be reverted, Grid (video game) should redirect to Grid. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:10, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Jacking → Jacking (dance) – "Jacking", as in using a Jack (device), seems to be a more obvious primary topic here. There are also other possible uses shown in the article's hatnote, as well as PTMs Juice jacking, Ice jacking, Oxide jacking, Flag jacking... See also Jack, which includes topics that could also be known as "Jacking". Move and make a new disambiguation page at Jacking. 162 etc. (talk) 20:51, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Logorrhea (psychology) → Logorrhea – Seems to be kind of a WP:SURPRISE situation that this subject is not at the base title. The only other title on the disambiguation page, Verbosity, though itself has a similar amount of page views as Logorrhea (psychology), when considering how many people will attempt to look up the word "Logorrhea" to arrive at Verbosity, apparently represented by the redirect Logorrhea (rhetoric) Logorrhea (rhetoric) , it seems to be used very seldom if ever (page views). Steel1943 (talk) 20:31, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Logorrhea → Logorrhea (disambiguation) Logorrhea (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary
- (Discuss) – 2009 Lone Grove–Ardmore tornado → 2009 Lone Grove tornado 2009 Lone Grove tornado – Per Wikipedia:COMMONNAME, as it had nearly all of its impacts in Lone Grove, and is referenced by the NWS and news sources as 'Lone Grove tornado' or 'tornado that struck Lone Grove' Lightbulb Noob (talk) 20:13, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Pablo (footballer, born 2004) → Pablo Felipe Pablo Felipe – This footballer goes by "Pablo Felipe" or just "Pablo" as WP:COMMONNAME using the former more and more recently, but there's 6 other footballers known as just Pablo per Pablo (footballer). "Pablo Felipe" is therefore natural disambiguation per WP:NATURAL and should be the name of this page. "Pablo Felipe" used on his official West Ham announcement, ESPN, BBC, EA FC, New York Times, and his own personal Instagram. Ortizesp (talk) 17:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – 2023 Guinea-Bissau coup attempt → Guinea-Bissau coup attempt allegations – Reliable sources said that it was clashes. Other sources: [18], [19]. Former president Umaro Sissoco Embaló, claimed that it is a coup attempt. Lots of sources use quotation marks for coup d'état, and it is disputed. [20], [21] Panam2014 (talk) 16:59, 28 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Hurricane Zeta C 17:44, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Nothin' at All (Heart song) → Nothin' at All Nothin' at All – Per WP:SMALLDETAILS, this should be moved to the base title as this is the only article titled exactly "Nothin' at All" with an apostrophe instead of the "g". ArthananWarcraft (talk) 17:23, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Limelight (Rush song) → Limelight (song) Limelight (song) – Only song with a Wikipedia article. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 17:15, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – CVS → CVS (disambiguation) CVS (disambiguation) – CVS Health is the primary meaning today. If I'm wrong, please show me. Georgia guy (talk) 15:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – SG Mall → ? – The subject’s full official name is Semanhyia Golden Mall. The current title is an abbreviation. Moving the article aligns with Wikipedia’s article title policy (WP:ARTICLE TITLES, WP:COMMONNAME). The abbreviated name "SG Mall" should redirect to the full name. Sweetabena (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Pú jiā yuè mó → Pú Jiā Yuè Mó – I believe the proper name should be capitalised. GnocchiFan (talk) 13:26, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Swindon Stadium → Abbey Stadium, Swindon – The stadium opened in 1949 as Abbey Stadium. Swindon Stadium appears to be a 2000s–2020s trading name adopted by its owner, Gaming International, while Abbey Stadium has remained the name used in planning applications, redevelopment proposals, and press coverage. Third-party sources (such as the BBC) frequently use "Abbey Stadium"; "Swindon Stadium" is less used, and is even absent entirely in some publications. As the venue is due to close in December 2025, the article title should reflect its full historical identity, not a relatively recent branding period. Per WP:COMMONNAME, reliable sources (including the BBC, Swindon Advertiser, The Link, and Greyhound News) consistently refer to the venue as Abbey Stadium, particularly in coverage of its closure. "Swindon Stadium" is used far less frequently in reliable sources, if at all. Per WP:PRECISION, Swindon Stadium is ambiguous given other stadiums in Swindon (notably the County Ground). Abbey Stadium, Swindon is precise and unambiguous. Per WP:OFFICIALNAME – Wikipedia does not require article titles to follow an owner’s trading or corporate name when it conflicts with common usage. Therefore, I believe this move better serves readers after closure, when historical coverage will outweigh contemporary branding. Icaldonta (talk) 23:30, 21 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 19:51, 28 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 11:34, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Top Pop Catalog Albums → Catalog Albums Catalog Albums – The chart has been renamed for as "Catalog Albums" at least since 2009. Wikipedia has kept the incorrect article title for more than 16 years. It also more WP:CONCISE. Bluesatellite (talk) 10:39, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Main North railway line, New South Wales → Main north railway line – There are no other articles with these titles, so the state name disambiguation is not required. This change complies with WP:CONCISE because we are removing a long part of the title. The capitalisation is also strange in that for instance "south" is capitalised and doesn't need to be, let alone the strangeness of the subsequent words not being capitalised. Qwerty123M (talk) 10:15, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Ma'ayan Harod → Ain Jalut Ain Jalut – In 2023 an RM was held with a 6-7 vote outcome, including two later-confirmed socks on the oppose side. The arguments made by the support side were that Ain Jalut is the common name in scholarship due to the pivotal Battle of Ain Jalut and that the Israeli renaming of the site in the 20th century after a minor biblical event has since been refuted by scholars. The argument made by the oppose side was that the Israeli renaming is the official name today of the surrounding Ma'ayan Harod National Park. All in all, a classic wiki naming dispute.
Having looked into this more deeply, we now have statistical evidence available. WikiNav shows that a clear majority of readers to this article come here from Battle of Ain Jalut, and our Redirects PageViews tool shows that a majority of views to the article come from the Ain Jalut / Ain Jalud redirects. Onceinawhile (talk) 06:08, 28 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 08:38, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Off the Wall (Michael Jackson song) → Off the Wall (song) Off the Wall (song) – Appears to be the WP:PDAB for songs with this title. Between the fact that this article averages several times more page views than the other song with this title that has an article (Off the Wall (Little Walter song)), and the fact that a Google search only seems to bring up results related to this song, this seems to be the primary topic for songs with this title. I can see the argument that WP:SONGDAB applies here, but cf. Let It Be (song) and Relax (song), where there is one song that clearly holds more significance as far as primary disambiguation status goes. I think the same applies here. JeffSpaceman (talk) 02:32, 28 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 08:35, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – TMSR → TMSR (disambiguation) TMSR (disambiguation) – I wish to use TMSR for an article on the Chinese Academy of Science's TMSR project (2011-present, with plans to 2035+) which now is working on its third reactor (article TMSR-LF1 is getting a bit big, and I want to make this the main article for what is mostly the background section there. The disambiguation page already exists, but is being used as a redirect... to this page, which is surrently... a disambiguation page. So I tried to 'be bold' and make this an actual page, but was pretty much instantly smacked down. This is IMHO shenanigans. Limulus (talk) 05:18, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – 2000 Ramallah lynching → Lynching of Yosef Avrahami and Vadim Nurzhitz – Lynchings of two or fewer people generally follow the format of "Lynching of [NAME]". ZionniThePeruser ( talk with me | read up on me ) 05:00, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – South Street Station → South Street Station (Rhode Island) – Does not appear to be the primary topic over others at South Street station. Also fine with moving to South Street Landing as proposed above, but in either case retarget the current title to the DAB. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:33, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Nanda Devi Plutonium Mission → Nuclear espionage in the Indian Himalayas – I wasn't able to find the phrase "Nanda Devi Plutonium Mission" in major sources, "Plutonium Mission" is a very vague idea and gives the wrong ideas about Pu-238 vs Pu-239 and the actual espionage purpose, "Mission" fails to indicate the article scope as multiple separate climbs, "Nanda Devi" fails to indicate the successful mission on Nanda Kot, I believe "CIA espionage in the Indian Himalayas" would also be appropriate as while it was a joint mission it was clearly initiated and led by the CIA. Doeze (talk) 14:39, 20 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 23:04, 27 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:50, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – North American International Auto Show → Detroit Auto Show Detroit Auto Show – NAIAS is officially known (again) as the Detroit Auto Show since 2025. Vossanova o< 00:26, 4 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
January 3, 2026
- (Discuss) – DIII-D (tokamak) → DIII-D DIII-D – Initially I moved this article to the title DIII-D after a G6 request was made, as the title was an unnecessary parenthesis. This move was contested on my talk page so I am moving it back for a full RM per request. There is a clear primary topic for DIII-D as only one thing is referred to by this title. As such, there is no need for a disambiguating parenthesis per WP:CONCISE. The previous RM above's single vote was a no, but was based upon the fact that DIII-D was not the primary topic at DIII. Whilst correct, this is meaningless as the requested title is not DIII but DIII-D, which is distinctly a different title. CoconutOctopus talk 22:50, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Vandal (disambiguation) → Vandal Vandal – No clear primary topic for the singular, Google and Images appear to return more results for the crime though Books appears to mainly return the tribe. Although the crime name comes from the tribe I think most people would associate the singular with the crime similar to say Perth/Perth, Scotland. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:51, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – The Dutchman → The Dutchman (song) – No indication that the 1968 song is primary over The Dutchman (2025 film). The link for The Dutchman should redirect to the Dutchman (disambiguation) page or, if preferred by consensus, the film's notability can alternatively lead to WP:PRIMARYTOPIC swap with the song. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 21:49, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Reddish → Reddish, Greater Manchester – No clear primary topic, the Greater Manchester one has 542 views but the Illinois one has 9, the surname has 4, the colour has 51,067 and the house has 852[Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:47, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Burlesque (stage musical) → Burlesque (musical) Burlesque (musical) – Per WP:CONCISE and PRIMARY, page for the 2024 musical should be moved over a little used redirect to Victorian burlesque per WP:Primary, which may very well be sending people to the wrong page(s) anyway. Hatnote can be added pointing to Burlesque (disambiguation), if necessary. BrechtBro (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Pasokification → ? – This seems to be another gross WP:SYNTH violation, because there's no indication of sources connecting all of these events into a coherent whole. At the same time, this term is generally fairly unknown, cf. https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=%2Fg%2F11dyzlvwz0&hl=en When I saw this I initially thought AfD was the best venue, but the Talk page indicates there was already a discussion for a merger from decline of center-left parties five years ago, albeit a sparsely attended one and one where consensus was declared somewhat curiously - but at the same time none of those people said it was unsalvageable. So let's try reassessing the title first - should this niche term continue to be used, or should we use a more descriptive title? --Joy (talk) 21:32, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Universidad Católica del Ecuador → Club Deportivo Universidad Católica (Ecuador) Club Deportivo Universidad Católica (Ecuador) – The current page name is ambiguous. "Universidad Católica" is the name for several "Catholic Universities" in Latin America. Proposing adding "Club Deportivo" and (Ecuador) to differentiate it from the more well known Club Deportivo Universidad Católica of Chile. "Club Deportivo" is part of the club's name. MicroX (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 21:19, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – 2023 US strikes in Syria → 2023 United States strikes in Syria – Current version uses an abbreviation of the United States. FantasticWikiUser (talk) 19:00, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Cloudberry liqueur → Lakka Lakka – User:Jähmefyysikko moved Lakka to Cloudberry liqueur without discussion, citing "use the English name" in the edit summary. Well, this article is not about cloudberry liqueur in general, but about the specific liqueur with the brand name "Lakka". Brand names are generally left untranslated. JIP | Talk 20:08, 27 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:32, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – 2026 United States strikes in Venezuela → Capture of Nicolás Maduro Capture of Nicolás Maduro – WP:COMMONNAME, all major news networks are reporting the operation, as the capture of Maduro. JCS Dan Caine said during the press conference that the aim of the operation was to capture Maduro. Images of Maduro have been released by DoD confirming his capture. I think the page can be moved now. An alternative title could be its codename "Operation Absolute Resolve", but I think Capture of Nicholás Maduro would be the more common title. Ecrusized (talk) 17:35, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – 1987 Swedish football division 1 → 1987 Division 1 (Swedish football) – These season articles should be moved given the outcome of the discussion about the division articles. Mattias321 (talk) 17:34, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- 1988 Swedish football division 1 → 1988 Division 1 (Swedish football)
- 1989 Swedish football division 1 → 1989 Division 1 (Swedish football)
- 1990 Swedish football division 1 → 1990 Division 1 (Swedish football)
- 1991 Swedish football division 1 → 1991 Division 1 (Swedish football)
- 1992 Swedish football division 1 → 1992 Division 1 (Swedish football)
- 1993 Swedish football division 1 → 1993 Division 1 (Swedish football)
- 1994 Swedish football division 1 → 1994 Division 1 (Swedish football)
- 1995 Swedish football division 1 → 1995 Division 1 (Swedish football)
- 1996 Swedish football division 1 → 1996 Division 1 (Swedish football)
- 1997 Swedish football division 1 → 1997 Division 1 (Swedish football)
- 1998 Swedish football division 1 → 1998 Division 1 (Swedish football)
- 1999 Swedish football division 1 → 1999 Division 1 (Swedish football)
- 1924–25 Swedish football division 2 → 1924–25 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1925–26 Swedish football division 2 → 1925–26 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1926–27 Swedish football division 2 → 1926–27 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1927–28 Swedish football division 2 → 1927–28 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1928–29 Swedish football division 2 → 1928–29 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1929–30 Swedish football division 2 → 1929–30 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1930–31 Swedish football division 2 → 1930–31 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1931–32 Swedish football division 2 → 1931–32 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1932–33 Swedish football division 2 → 1932–33 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1933–34 Swedish football division 2 → 1933–34 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1934–35 Swedish football division 2 → 1934–35 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1935–36 Swedish football division 2 → 1935–36 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1936–37 Swedish football division 2 → 1936–37 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1937–38 Swedish football division 2 → 1937–38 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1938–39 Swedish football division 2 → 1938–39 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1939–40 Swedish football division 2 → 1939–40 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1940–41 Swedish football division 2 → 1940–41 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1941–42 Swedish football division 2 → 1941–42 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1942–43 Swedish football division 2 → 1942–43 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1943–44 Swedish football division 2 → 1943–44 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1944–45 Swedish football division 2 → 1944–45 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1945–46 Swedish football division 2 → 1945–46 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1946–47 Swedish football division 2 → 1946–47 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1947–48 Swedish football division 2 → 1947–48 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1948–49 Swedish football division 2 → 1948–49 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1949–50 Swedish football division 2 → 1949–50 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1950–51 Swedish football division 2 → 1950–51 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1951–52 Swedish football division 2 → 1951–52 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1952–53 Swedish football division 2 → 1952–53 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1953–54 Swedish football division 2 → 1953–54 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1954–55 Swedish football division 2 → 1954–55 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1955–56 Swedish football division 2 → 1955–56 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1956–57 Swedish football division 2 → 1956–57 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1957–58 Swedish football division 2 → 1957–58 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1959 Swedish football division 2 → 1959 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1960 Swedish football division 2 → 1960 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1961 Swedish football division 2 → 1961 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1962 Swedish football division 2 → 1962 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1963 Swedish football division 2 → 1963 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1964 Swedish football division 2 → 1964 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1965 Swedish football division 2 → 1965 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1966 Swedish football division 2 → 1966 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1967 Swedish football division 2 → 1967 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1968 Swedish football division 2 → 1968 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1969 Swedish football division 2 → 1969 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1970 Swedish football division 2 → 1970 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1971 Swedish football division 2 → 1971 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1972 Swedish football division 2 → 1972 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1973 Swedish football division 2 → 1973 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1974 Swedish football division 2 → 1974 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1975 Swedish football division 2 → 1975 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1976 Swedish football division 2 → 1976 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1977 Swedish football division 2 → 1977 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1978 Swedish football division 2 → 1978 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1979 Swedish football division 2 → 1979 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1980 Swedish football division 2 → 1980 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1981 Swedish football division 2 → 1981 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1982 Swedish football division 2 → 1982 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1983 Swedish football division 2 → 1983 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1984 Swedish football division 2 → 1984 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1985 Swedish football division 2 → 1985 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1986 Swedish football division 2 → 1986 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1987 Swedish football division 2 → 1987 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1988 Swedish football division 2 → 1988 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1989 Swedish football division 2 → 1989 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1990 Swedish football division 2 → 1990 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1991 Swedish football division 2 → 1991 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1992 Swedish football division 2 → 1992 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1993 Swedish football division 2 → 1993 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1994 Swedish football division 2 → 1994 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1995 Swedish football division 2 → 1995 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1996 Swedish football division 2 → 1996 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1997 Swedish football division 2 → 1997 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1998 Swedish football division 2 → 1998 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1999 Swedish football division 2 → 1999 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2000 Swedish football division 2 → 2000 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2001 Swedish football division 2 → 2001 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2002 Swedish football division 2 → 2002 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2003 Swedish football division 2 → 2003 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2004 Swedish football division 2 → 2004 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2005 Swedish football division 2 → 2005 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2006 Swedish football division 2 → 2006 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2007 Swedish football division 2 → 2007 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2008 Swedish football division 2 → 2008 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2009 Swedish football division 2 → 2009 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2010 Swedish football division 2 → 2010 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2011 Swedish football division 2 → 2011 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2012 Swedish football division 2 → 2012 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2013 Swedish football division 2 → 2013 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2014 Swedish football division 2 → 2014 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2018 Swedish football division 2 → 2018 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2020 Swedish football division 2 → 2020 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2024 Swedish football division 2 → 2024 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 2025 Swedish football division 2 → 2025 Division 2 (Swedish football)
- 1928–29 Swedish football division 3 → 1928–29 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1929–30 Swedish football division 3 → 1929–30 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1930–31 Swedish football division 3 → 1930–31 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1931–32 Swedish football division 3 → 1931–32 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1932–33 Swedish football division 3 → 1932–33 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1933–34 Swedish football division 3 → 1933–34 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1934–35 Swedish football division 3 → 1934–35 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1935–36 Swedish football division 3 → 1935–36 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1936–37 Swedish football division 3 → 1936–37 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1937–38 Swedish football division 3 → 1937–38 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1938–39 Swedish football division 3 → 1938–39 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1939–40 Swedish football division 3 → 1939–40 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1940–41 Swedish football division 3 → 1940–41 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1941–42 Swedish football division 3 → 1941–42 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1942–43 Swedish football division 3 → 1942–43 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1943–44 Swedish football division 3 → 1943–44 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1944–45 Swedish football division 3 → 1944–45 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1945–46 Swedish football division 3 → 1945–46 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1946–47 Swedish football division 3 → 1946–47 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1947–48 Swedish football division 3 → 1947–48 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1948–49 Swedish football division 3 → 1948–49 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1949–50 Swedish football division 3 → 1949–50 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1950–51 Swedish football division 3 → 1950–51 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1951–52 Swedish football division 3 → 1951–52 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1952–53 Swedish football division 3 → 1952–53 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1953–54 Swedish football division 3 → 1953–54 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1954–55 Swedish football division 3 → 1954–55 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1955–56 Swedish football division 3 → 1955–56 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1956–57 Swedish football division 3 → 1956–57 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1957–58 Swedish football division 3 → 1957–58 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1959 Swedish football division 3 → 1959 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1960 Swedish football division 3 → 1960 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1961 Swedish football division 3 → 1961 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1962 Swedish football division 3 → 1962 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1963 Swedish football division 3 → 1963 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1966 Swedish football division 3 → 1966 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1967 Swedish football division 3 → 1967 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1968 Swedish football division 3 → 1968 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1969 Swedish football division 3 → 1969 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1970 Swedish football division 3 → 1970 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1971 Swedish football division 3 → 1971 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1993 Swedish football division 3 → 1993 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1994 Swedish football division 3 → 1994 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1995 Swedish football division 3 → 1995 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1996 Swedish football division 3 → 1996 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1997 Swedish football division 3 → 1997 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1998 Swedish football division 3 → 1998 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 1999 Swedish football division 3 → 1999 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 2000 Swedish football division 3 → 2000 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 2001 Swedish football division 3 → 2001 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 2002 Swedish football division 3 → 2002 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 2003 Swedish football division 3 → 2003 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 2004 Swedish football division 3 → 2004 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 2005 Swedish football division 3 → 2005 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 2006 Swedish football division 3 → 2006 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 2007 Swedish football division 3 → 2007 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 2008 Swedish football division 3 → 2008 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 2009 Swedish football division 3 → 2009 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 2010 Swedish football division 3 → 2010 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- 2011 Swedish football division 3 → 2011 Division 3 (Swedish football)
- (Discuss) – McDowell High School → McDowell High School (Pennsylvania) – Per WP:PRECISE and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.
The phrase "McDowell High School" would have different meanings in different places: * If you're in North Carolina, it would automatically be McDowell High School (Marion, North Carolina) * If you're in western Pennsylvania, it would automatically be McDowell High School This one is a bit bigger and a bit older, but I don't think it reaches WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for a global encyclopedia. The current naming format is likely because one article was created 3 months before the other in 2007. If this passes, the current name could then be used as a disambiguation page which would now have a third entry. Totally open to alternative parenthetical disambiguation but "(Millcreek Township, Erie County, Pennsylvania)" seemed like a mouthful. - RevelationDirect (talk) 16:37, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Twelve Angry Men (play) → Twelve Angry Men (stage play) Twelve Angry Men (stage play) – Twelve Angry Men (Westinghouse Studio One) was also a play, and preceded this one. — BarrelProof (talk) 23:23, 22 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Hurricane Zeta C 16:01, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Clix → Clix (disambiguation) Clix (disambiguation) – I argue that Clix (gamer) is the primary topic for Clix. Upon searching for Clix on any search engine, Cody Conrod will predominantly appear. Also see this chart of traffic through the Clix page, leading exclusively to the gamer Rockfighterz M (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – League (China) → League (Inner Mongolia) League (Inner Mongolia) – The usage of 'China' in the title suggests that the classification of leagues applies to at least several regions of China. In reality this classification is used only in Inner Mongolia, so I feel the article name should reflect this. AetherAirlines (talk) 12:15, 27 December 2025 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 15:14, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Kitty Duterte → Veronica Duterte Veronica Duterte – after seeing the arguments in Talk:Kiko Pangilinan#Requested move 13 May 2025,Talk:Juan Miguel Zubiri#Requested move 9 August 2025, and Talk:Ronald dela Rosa#Requested move 7 September 2025, most medias refer to her as "Veronica 'Kitty' Duterte" and not "Kitty Duterte" outright, these medias include Tempo, Inquirer, GMA, and Philstar Global. RobertMaskey (talk) 13:41, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Meeker Massacre → Meeker Incident – "Meeker Massacre" shows implicit bias and disregards facts that do not support it being a "massacre." History is always told by the winners and this was no different: Governor Pitkin campaigned on the removal of the Utes from their lands, and inflammatory press statements were being made frequently... long prior to the Meeker Incident. They were negotiators, first and foremost. Both Thornburgh and the Utes intended to negotiate with Meeker. This type of conflict and tension had not happened with prior agents... Meeker wasn’t the first agent they had, simply the first that had such issues, and that is due to the political climate and pressure he was under. Further, at the incident, various primary sources show that Meeker and the employees engaged the Utes first, as the women and children were told to hide in the milk house. Much of this information is found in already-cited secondary sources, and of course, I can find more of these sources. There is little, factual and proven information that the Utes attacked and massacred the agency. The main title being termed "Massacre" implies that the employees were defenseless and that the Utes were the primary aggressors, which is a largely disproven narrative and factually incorrect version of the story that has, for some reason, remained the primary naming of the incident. Aprilrbchistory (talk) 21:31, 20 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 04:06, 27 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 10:18, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Ele.me → Taobao Shangou – Rebranded to Taobao Shangou. Ref: https://talent.alibaba.com/en/home 0x0a (talk) 08:48, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – List of Formula One World Championship points scoring systems → List of Formula One points systems – Simply, WP:CONCISE. The proposed title is relatively unambiguous and the points system of the World Championship is by far the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC over those of the British and South African Championships. Also WP:CONSISTENT on that matter with circuits, red-flagged races, seasons, drivers, drivers who set a fastest lap, female drivers, and driver numbers. "Scoring" is an unnecessary modifier—it is routinely known simply as a "points system" in secondary media.[23] [24] [25] [26] [27] MB 2437 08:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Roanoke station (Virginia) → Roanoke station Roanoke station – This appears to be the primary topic over Roanoke Station, Indiana. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:28, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Historical Medieval Battles → Armored Combat – The term Historical Medieval Battles appears to have been antiquated. Overwhelmingly, the sport is referred to as Armored Combat in publications and governing bodies, to the point if you attempt to search Historical Medieval Battles on google it gives no relevant results to the sport, while Armored Combat does. Inversely, if you search Armored Combat on google this article does not appear despite covering this sport, thus failing Recognizability and Precision per WP:CRITERIA. I have a feeling this article has received much less attention due to the name. For these reasons the name should be switched to Armored Combat. references: https://www.esquire.com/sports/a64742755/what-is-armored-mma-medieval-combat/ https://www.sca.org/resources/martial-activities/armored-combat/#:~:text=Overview,wound%E2%80%9D%20or%20%E2%80%9Ckill%E2%80%9D. https://www.visitpittsburgh.com/blog/pittsburgh-armored-combat/ Bobbobet (talk) 07:21, 27 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 07:09, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Queen Emma of Hawaii → Emma of Hawaii Emma of Hawaii – Per WP:CONSORTS (
The titles "Queen" and "Empress" are generally not included in article titles for deceased consorts, although the title of a consort of a lesser ruling prince (duke, grand duke, etc.) may be.
). The prefix "Queen" is dropped from the names of all deceased royal consorts. Other examples where a queen's married name is used but the prefix "Queen" is omitted are Marie of Romania, Anne of Romania, Adelaide of Italy, Maria of Yugoslavia, Alexandra of Yugoslavia, etc. The Ngram shows no significant difference between "Queen Emma of Hawaii" and "Emma of Hawaii" so it would be reasonable to follow the naming guidelines at WP:NCROY and WP:CONSISTENT. Keivan.f Talk 07:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 07:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Pat Spencer → Patrick Spencer – Last discussed in July 2022 when he was a minor league basketball player. Now that he is an established NBA player his in season page view have skyrocketed. pageviews since he has become an NBA athlete show he is primary. Dab should be moved to Pat Spencer (disambiguation). TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:10, 27 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 05:54, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – 2025 NRL Women's Premiership Grand Final → 2025 NRLW Grand Final – The current title is too long and very difficult to search for. These titles would be much shorter and more compliant with WP:CONCISE. WP:COMMONNAME also says that we should use a commonly recognisable name, one that is supported by reliable sources and is the most well-known name. I also support changing the titles of NRLW season articles but I'll start a seperate discussion for that on the 2025 page if this proposal has favourable reception. Per WP:OFFICIALNAME, we should use the name that most people know, not the one that any organisation promotes. I support a derivative of this title like "2025 NRL Women's Grand Final", but NRLW is the most commonly used name for the league. It's really strange that we use "Premiership" here and not for the men's game. Qwerty123M (talk) 04:25, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- 2024 NRL Women's Premiership Grand Final → 2024 NRLW Grand Final
- 2023 NRL Women's Premiership Grand Final → 2023 NRLW Grand Final
- 2022 NRL Women's Premiership Grand Final → 2022 NRLW Grand Final
- 2021 NRL Women's Premiership Grand Final → 2021 NRLW Grand Final
- 2020 NRL Women's Premiership Grand Final → 2020 NRLW Grand Final
- (Discuss) – Kaimingjie germ weapon attack → Ningbo plague attack – More common and more descriptive name per Google Scholar results Doeze (talk) 00:57, 3 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
January 2, 2026
- (Discuss) – Jan of Jenštejn → John of Jenstein John of Jenstein – More common English name according to the scholarly literature. See, e.g.: * https://journals.phil.muni.cz/graeco-latina-brunensia/article/view/42417 * https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/transactions-of-the-royal-historical-society/article/abs/john-of-jenstein-archbishop-of-prague-13781397/EE90B58AC11B8EE264BF1222107C0356 * https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/102191 Packare (talk) 23:34, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Matheus Pereira → Matheus Pereira (footballer, born 1996) Matheus Pereira (footballer, born 1996) – A year ago this page was moved to Primary with the justification being page views being higher, and while yes it is true that the page views are higher, I don't feel they are that much higher to justify it. An analysis over the past 90 days shows it averaged 105 daily views compared to about 20 for a couple other pages of the same name, but that includes a huge spike meant for another player. Removing that spike drops it back to the 85-90 range. Sub-100 daily views, doesn't really scream Primary to me. Sure 85 to 20 is 4.5x, but it's different than say 4500 vs 1000. Anything sub-100 doesn't really seem like a clear PRIMARY in my opinion RedPatch (talk) 21:34, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Byzantine Greeks → Rhomaioi (endonym) – Recent Talk discussion has resolved a year-long dispute and addressed neutrality concerns. To better reflect the main content of this former GA article, it is requested that the article be renamed to Rhomaioi (endonym) and scoped as identity-based. Content on society and population would be split to a separate population-centric article, while Byzantine Greeks would be repurposed as a historiography article covering the modern scholarly label. Biz (talk) 20:00, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – STV Radio (Scotland) → STV Radio – The Japanese radio station on the disambiguation page does not have its own article on English Wikipedia, and Sapporo Television Broadcasting can be linked to in a disambiguation hatnote. UltrasonicMadness (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- STV Radio → STV Radio (disambiguation) STV Radio (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary
- (Discuss) – 2025 Southern Yemen offensive → Southern Yemen clashes (2025–present) – More appropriate name if this article is going to include both the STC offensive and the Saudi/PLC counteroffensive. Hsnkn (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Aston Park, Flintshire → Aston, Flintshire Aston, Flintshire – At present, Aston, Flintshire is a redirect to Aston Park, Flintshire. The name "Aston" is used by the Ordnance Survey,[1] [2] Royal Mail,[3] Flintshire County Council[4] , the Clwyd-Powys Archaeological Trust (as was),[5] and the BBC.[6] It is also used as the name of a built-up area[7] and a council ward.[8] I know "Aston Park" is used as part of the names of Aston Park Rangers[9] and "Aston Park Road",[10] and both names seem to be used interchangeably for Aston Community Centre,[11] but I haven't seen any reliable sources which refer to a place in the area called Aston Park. Aston, Flintshire is currently a redirect to Aston Park, Flintshire, so both terms appear to refer to the same place. I contend that "Aston" is a far more widely accepted name for it than "Aston Park" is.
References
- ^ "View map: Ordnance Survey, Flintshire X.15 (Hawarden; Sealand; West Saltney) - Ordnance Survey 25 inch England and Wales, 1841-1952". maps.nls.uk. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
- ^ "Map of Search results". Streetmap.co.uk. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
- ^ "Interesting Information for The Croft, Aston, Deeside, Wales, CH5 3BA Postcode". streetcheck.co.uk. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
- ^ "About Us". flintshire.gov.uk. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
- ^ "An Archaeological Assessment of the A494 Improvement Scheme, Drome Corner to Ewloe, Clwyd". walesher1974.org. May 1992. Archived from the original on 7 June 2019. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
- ^ "Seven-lane highway plan abandoned". 27 March 2008. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
- ^ "Aston (Flintshire) Postcodes". doogal.co.uk. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
- ^ "Electoral Arrangements for Flintshire". flintshire.gov.uk. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
- ^ "Aston Park Rangers". pitchero.com. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
- ^ "Aston Bowling Club". Hawarden Community Council. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
- ^ "Centres and Halls". Hawarden Community Council. Retrieved 2 January 2026.
- (Discuss) – U.S. Customs and Border Protection → United States Customs and Border Protection United States Customs and Border Protection – Per WP:PRECISE, unlike other US federal government and law enforcement agencies that use "United States" for example, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (but recent move), United States Department of Justice, etc. Absolutiva 13:49, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – HSL → HSL (disambiguation) HSL (disambiguation) – To make HSL a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to HSL and HSV. The color space is the clear primary topic for the acronym as can be seen on WikiNav here and by all-time pageviews. Thanks, Glasspalace (talk • contribs) 12:57, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – 2024–present structural changes to local government in England → Upcoming structural changes to local government in England – Suggest this as a page title for now as 2024 is long past without any changes. Any page title with future dates should be avoided. This is a political process highly likely to be delayed or otherwise unpredictable. MRSC (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – The Prestige → The Prestige (novel) The Prestige (novel) – Per page views, the film would have a greater claim to be the primary topic over the novel. --wooden superman 11:21, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Ginza line → Tokyo Metro Ginza Line Tokyo Metro Ginza Line – Most of these are restorations of articles to their titles prior to the recent page moves. The format of "Tokyo Metro X Line" appears to be the WP:COMMONNAME for each line. Additionally, some other line articles were not moved, creating an issue in regards to WP:CONSISTENT. Each page move received minimal participation so there does not appear to be a strong consensus on the new titles. The editor who proposed the previous moves appeared to express uncertainty with his proposals, and was extrapolating a titling format used to refer to a different system internationally (the Singapore MRT), which does not apply to the Tokyo subway. Additionally, the restoration of the diacritic to the Tōzai Line article title similarly meets WP:COMMONNAME and brings it in line with the other Tokyo subway article titles per WP:CONSISTENT. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 10:24, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Marunouchi line → Tokyo Metro Marunouchi Line Tokyo Metro Marunouchi Line
- Hibiya line → Tokyo Metro Hibiya Line Tokyo Metro Hibiya Line
- Tokyo Metro Tozai Line → Tokyo Metro Tōzai Line Tokyo Metro Tōzai Line
- Chiyoda line → Tokyo Metro Chiyoda Line Tokyo Metro Chiyoda Line
- Hanzōmon line → Tokyo Metro Hanzōmon Line Tokyo Metro Hanzōmon Line
- Fukutoshin line → Tokyo Metro Fukutoshin Line Tokyo Metro Fukutoshin Line
- (Discuss) – Salt flat → Salt flat (disambiguation) Salt flat (disambiguation) – Given that Salt pan and Salt flat are synonymous, but that also Salt pan more clearly requires disambiguation, while Salt flat is the more obvious choice for an unambiguous base name. The respective usage has drawn more or less even on Ngrams, without factoring in other uses. As with Salt pan, Salt flat is currently a disambiguation page, but the resident alternative meanings are frankly weak. Neither dry lake nor salt marsh are straightforward synonyms (so should not be there in the first place) and the place names are obviously all derivative of and secondary to the geographical feature terminology. If anything, the place names actually emphasise how 'salt flat' actually enjoys wider practical geographical usage than 'salt pan'. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Capital City Service → Capital City Service firm – The article is about a football firm, I believe that should also be evident in the title for correct titling as I feeling Capital City Service, could also refer too multiple organisations. Even for instance, you can find [28] a company with that name on Companies house. This should be a simple thing to do like we add F.C. on the end for football club teams. Govvy (talk) 08:49, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Puerto Rican Day Parade attacks → 2000 Puerto Rican Day Parade attacks – Event appears to fail WP:NOYEAR requirements. A lack of other notable Puerto Rican Day Parade attacks does not imply that a year is not necessary, factors such as how identifiable the incident does, and this incident does not appear to reach that level of notoriety. Raskuly (talk) 06:20, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Spokane bombing attempt → 2011 Spokane bombing attempt 2011 Spokane bombing attempt – Event appears to fail WP:NOYEAR requirements. A lack of other notable bombing attempts in Spokane does not imply that a year is not necessary, factors such as how identifiable the incident are, and this incident does not appear to reach that level of notoriety. Raskuly (talk) 06:17, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Microchip implant (human) → Human microchip implant – Per WP:NATURAL, and because the DAB is currently improper anyway. I also have no qualms about it being called "Human microchip implantation", but that is probably unnecessary. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:05, 19 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks, Glasspalace (talk • contribs) 09:44, 26 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ROY is WAR Talk! 05:02, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Archdiocese of Montréal → Archdiocese of Montreal Archdiocese of Montreal – (1) WP:CANFRENCH says that the accent is not to be used for Montreal, since that is common usage in English; (2) The Archdiocese operates bilingually, and its English webpage does not use the accent; WP:COMMONNAME applies and we should follow the Archdiocese, which aligns with WP:CANFRENCH. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 04:58, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Waterbury station → Waterbury station (Metro-North) Waterbury station (Metro-North) – This does not seem to be the primary topic over either Waterbury Union Station or Waterbury station (Vermont), both of which get similar numbers of views. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:42, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Mohammed al-Haddad → Mohammed Ali Ahmed al-Haddad Mohammed Ali Ahmed al-Haddad – Per WP:INITS and WP:COMMONNAME, most English-language reliable sources use the full form of the name "Mohammed Ali Ahmed al-Haddad". This was changed by an undiscussed move and the page has since been move protected, and I believe this change might be controversial, so opening a discussion. NYT, AP, and Al Jazeera use the entire name while referring to the subject. Hurricane Zeta C 20:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 04:16, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – San Antonio parade shooting → 1979 San Antonio parade shooting – Event appears to fail WP:NOYEAR requirements. A lack of other notable parade shootings in San Antonio does not imply that a year is not necessary, factors such as how identifiable the incident is, and this incident does not appear to reach that level of notoriety. Raskuly (talk) 03:12, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Taipo River (Westland District) → Taipo River – WP:SMALLDETAILS means that this disambiguation, and the disambiguation page itself, is unnecessary. I note that neither of the other two entries on the page - Tai Po River and Taipa River - have disambugation for obvious reasons. I propose deleting the disambiguation page and covering any potential confusion with hatnotes. Turnagra (talk) 03:09, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Jesse Green (theatre critic) → Jesse Green (writer) – Subject is no longer working as a theater critic, though he spent 12 years as one, he previously did journalism and is doing it again, and will presumably become better known for his current work as time goes on. either way, theatre is not correct for American English, especially for someone at the NYT (which corrects even proper names to theater). Bringing this up as discussion instead of a bold move for feedback: would Jesse Green (journalist) be better? BrechtBro (talk) 02:16, 19 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:29, 26 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. --Seawolf35 T--C 03:02, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Tenet → Tenet (disambiguation) Tenet (disambiguation) – I am requesting that the article on the 2020 Christopher Nolan film be moved to become the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the term "Tenet", per the pageviews count. A quick web search took me until the 12th or 13th page to find any article not about the film, which were mainly discussing "Tenet Solutions", "Tenet Healthcare", and "Tenet Media", all of which are sufficiently disambiguated names. There are also entries for TENET (network), Tenet (band), and Tenet (ensemble), although none of their pageviews remotely meet the average view count for this film article or the DAB page, which has an unusually exorbinate viewcount, presumably for readers looking for an article on the film directly. For those who may inquire about the term "TENET" potentially holding more weight, there is precedent in another Nolan film, Inception , being the primary over the term "inception", which is complemented by its own DAB page, Inception (disambiguation). A hatnote at the film article pointing to the DAB, where the "TENET" inscription in the Sator Square is listed, should suffice for readers looking for the other targets. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 03:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Edward I of England → Edward I Edward I – Per WP:SOVEREIGN as in line with WP:COMMONNAME, after a previous move from 5 November 2023, there was no consensus. Absolutiva 01:28, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Civico Museo di Storia Naturale di Trieste → Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Trieste – Use the Italian name of the museum as given on its website, and even in photos as seen in the English page for the website ([29]) or in Google Street View. It's unclear to me where the "Civico Museo" order came from (and I don't know Italian so I don't know if it is a mistake or not), but the original version of this article from 2007 has a link that at the time gave the name as "Civico Museo di Storia Naturale" which may explain it: [30] (archive from December 2007) Not as important but this move would also make it consistent with the other "Civic museums of natural history" in Category:Natural history museums in Italy. Monster Iestyn (talk) 00:07, 2 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
January 1, 2026
- (Discuss) – Pure Cult: for Rockers, Ravers, Lovers, and Sinners → Pure Cult Pure Cult – Article is about an album that has 2 versions of roughly equal importance. They both share the title "Pure Cult" with different subtitles. I think it makes sense to title article just "Pure Cult". AllMusic and Rock Hard (magazine) refer to the first album as simply "Pure Cult": [31], [32]. Rock Hard also refer to the reissue as just "Pure Cult" (at least in the title of the review, the whole review is paywalled): [33]. Mika1h (talk) 23:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Viktor Pylypenko → Viktor Pylypenko (footballer) – This has happened so many times with people who share a full name on WP. In this case, I think that the recently created article about the war veteran Viktor Pylypenko (military) has far more outreach than this young man, who (by infobox information) is not even an active player now. CoryGlee 22:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Shulamit (play) → Shulamith (play) Shulamith (play) – It appears that "Shulamith" is a more common reference to the play in English-originatting sources, compared to Shulamit annd Shulamis --Altenmann >talk 22:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Jesse Rodriguez (boxer) → Jesse Rodriguez – Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The boxer has by far the most web traffic / pageviews for anyone with the same / similar name. Jesse Rodriguez (swimmer) only has 74 views over the last 30 days and Jess Rodriguez only has 122. Jesse Rodriguez (boxer) has over 30,000 views over the last 30 days. GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 21:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Jesse Rodriguez → Jesse Rodriguez (disambiguation) Jesse Rodriguez (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary
- (Discuss) – Jacksonville Landing shooting → 2018 Jacksonville Landing shooting 2018 Jacksonville Landing shooting – Event appears to fail WP:NOYEAR requirements. A lack of other notable shootings at Jacksonville Landing does not imply that a year is not necessary, factors such as how identifiable the incident is, and this incident does not appear to reach that level of notoriety. Raskuly (talk) 19:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Jamie Christian-Johal → Jamie Bigg – This subject has recently announced that the surname has been subject to revert to birth name, has already named himself on Instagram and some TAs have changed the article accordingly. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 17:42, 1 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Alfred Collins (American football) → Alfred Collins – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC per page views Joeykai (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Alfred Collins → Alfred Collins (disambiguation) Alfred Collins (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary
- (Discuss) – Boris Knyazev → ? – Per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NCP (Naming conventions for people), the article title should reflect the name most commonly used in reliable secondary sources. Major authority control records, including the Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF), list the subject under the heading Boris Kniaseff. This form is also used as the primary title in other language editions of Wikipedia and in library catalogues, while Boris Knyazev represents a direct transliteration variant from Russian. I propose moving the article to Boris Kniaseff and retaining Boris Knyazev as a redirect, with both spellings acknowledged in the lead. Nsaa (talk) 15:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Kingdom of Eastern Georgia → Georgia under Mongol rule – The dominant political reality of the period covered by the article was Mongol overlordship, which fundamentally shaped governance, taxation, military obligations, and royal succession in Georgia. Eastern Georgia functioned not as a fully sovereign and clearly defined kingdom, but as a vassal territory under Mongol authority. As such, the title "Kingdom of Eastern Georgia" implies a level of independence and institutional continuity that does not accurately reflect the historical situation. Moreover, the secession of the Kingdom of Western Georgia was itself a direct consequence of Mongol domination, undertaken largely in an effort to escape Mongol rule. This further undermines the notion of a stable or unified "Kingdom of Eastern Georgia" during this period. The article’s content primarily addresses Mongol rule and influence over Georgia as a whole, with particular emphasis on eastern regions where Mongol control was most direct, rather than focusing on a formally constituted, independent kingdom. Renaming the article to "Georgia under Mongol rule" would therefore better align the title with the actual scope and substance of the article. Additionally, there is an existing requested article at Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)/Requested articles titled "Georgia under the Mongol rule". The fact that Georgian Wikipedia contains articles on Mongol rule in Georgia but not on a "Kingdom of Eastern Georgia" further suggests that the latter is not a commonly used or well-established historical designation. For these reasons, "Georgia under Mongol rule" is a more accurate, neutral, and historiographically sound title that better reflects both the historical realities of the period and the article’s content. Gergos10 (talk) 15:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – House of Cards → House of Cards (disambiguation) House of Cards (disambiguation) – The American TV series is the obvious WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. All-time pageviews for the top 5 topics on the House of Cards DAB page overwhelmingly favor the American TV series, despite it having ended seven years ago with devastatingly poor reviews. WikiNav data for both the House of cards article and House of Cards DAB page indicate that the vast majority of people are searching for the American TV series with the term "House of cards", as many of the views from that article lead to the House of Cards DAB page, and subsequently to this article. Beyond pageviews, the series certainly holds enough long-term significance to be the primary topic for "House of Cards" (which is distinct from House of cards per WP:SMALLDETAILS) due to its role in elevating Netflix to its present-day juggernaut status, and by extension, paving the way for streaming television to grow as far as it has today. Thanks, Glasspalace (talk • contribs) 08:17, 25 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 11:42, 1 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- (Discuss) – Badfish → Badfish (band) Badfish (band) – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, there is absolutely no reason why a tribute band with the same name should have their article be the primary topic. The song itself holds more long-term significance ("Badfish song" garners more Google hits than "Badfish band"), and is in fact where the tribute band got their name from. WP:LTS clearly applies here. JeffSpaceman (talk) 02:36, 24 December 2025 (UTC)— Relisting. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:24, 24 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath talk 11:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Possibly incomplete requests
- Talk:CVS – CVS is requested for move to CVS (disambiguation), which could make the disambiguation malplaced. Has a primary redirect been specified?
- Talk:HSL – HSL is requested for move to HSL (disambiguation), which could make the disambiguation malplaced. Has a primary redirect been specified?
References
{{reflist-talk}} in the talk page section with the requested move to show references there.
See also
- Wikipedia:Requested moves/Article alerts, which includes a list of recently closed, as well as open discussions