User talk:Robert McClenon

Index

---

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be auto-archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 7.

Other archives
Problem Archive
Famekeeper Archive
FuelWagon Archive
Jack User Archive
John Carter Archive
PhiladelphiaInjustice Archive
78 Archive
DIRECTIVEA113 Archive

Please give your consensus result and take action on Splitting discussion on Disney Star talk page. Ajitsinghbhagat (talk) 05:56, 20 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Ajitsinghbhagat - In Wikipedia, there is no deadline. Why are you in a hurry to close this discussion after 48 hours? Robert McClenon (talk) 17:49, 20 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Okay, no problem Ajitsinghbhagat (talk) 01:43, 21 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Now,Disney Star's page should move to JioStar It is notable now, I added few articles with refrences you can check out post merger articles. Ajitsinghbhagat (talk) 08:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(trialing replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 09:31, 4 September 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Salman of Saudi Arabia on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 08:33, 17 September 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Robert McClenon: What's the point of (positively) reviewing this article? Several users (including me) have pointed out that the article has no chance to survive, yet it seems you just ignored those comments. Renerpho (talk) 16:31, 6 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Libel on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 18:32, 6 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Robert McClenon: I finally became a extended user can I now file about the issue regarding the - Draft talk:Anuradhapura invasion of Chola Kingdom (114-136).Thanks TeenX808 (talk) 05:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:North Korea on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 03:31, 10 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Diane Keaton on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 20:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Matt Walsh (political commentator) on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 19:31, 16 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Visual Studio Code on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 05:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I don’t know if you still consider yourself an administrator hopeful but your expressed attitude of "if you can use a scalpel or a hammer, use a hammer because it’s easier" at ANI is not the sort of thing I want to hear coming from an admin. I hope you take this on board if another RFA comes up and maybe reconsider your proposed sanction against me. Dronebogus (talk) 17:40, 18 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 00:31, 22 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pointer (computer programming) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 18:31, 22 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello, I have submitted this Draft:Zauq E Naat for review. Could you please review it? It would be a great favor. Thank you. BrownCanary61 (talk) 15:12, 23 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sati (practice) on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 17:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello,

May I ask the details of the result about the page AFC Ajax in international football? The case seems to be closed in Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard but the user still keeps playing with the content of the page and I cannot reach him/her.

Regards...

Magawla61 (talk) Magawla61 (talk) 09:03, 29 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Well composted they will do the roses a lot of good!

We need more goats. Most days I feel it is just me. It's quite a challenge! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:16, 31 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

[1] User:Polygnotus/Scripts/SourceTable3.js then go to an AfD, click edit. An "Assess Sources" button should appear next to the page title. If you close the popup by generating the code you can re-open it and continue where you were. Work in progress. Polygnotus (talk) 13:26, 2 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Thank you, User:Polygnotus. There are a variety of tools to prepare a source assessment table. I put the assessment notes in an Excel spreadsheet and then use the Excel-to-wikitable tool. I plan to continue to use it, and I know that other editors will use other techniques. I think that the ruminant can eat overly lengthy discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:02, 2 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ricky Hatton on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 22:30, 4 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I accidentally mixed up the two from the three letter acronyms and it was completely my fault, thank you for helping!! ConeKota (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:ConeKota - These things (slightly wrong forum) sometimes happen. I thought you would want it moved to the right place. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:21, 5 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello — I revised this draft to use a neutral tone and added independent references from AVIT and other third-party mentions. I would appreciate any suggestions on improving verifiability or neutrality before resubmitting. Thank you. Anishalx (talk) 12:53, 7 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I hope now you understand what I was trying to get at[2]... No matter how hard we tried at DRN this editor was just going to end up sabotaging it if it wasn't going their way (which it wasn't, they didn't want a RfC they wanted DRN to say that they were 100% right and nothing else). I have general confidence in you and DRN, but neither your or DRN can pickle this particular cucumber. I apologize that I came across as a particularly prickly cucumber vine myself, you do good work at DRN and I was too short with you as a result of my frustration with this endless cycle of bludgeoning and escalation. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Horse Eye's Back - Thank you. I am not sure whether to say that I accept your apology or that an apology is not necessary. After several decades of involvement in complex discussions, I know that occasionally it takes a while to see where or who the problem is. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:16, 7 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi there,

I wanted to appeal your rejection of my draft submission the other day. It appears there may have been some misunderstandings that I need to clear up:

1. While Yakuza Kiwami 3 and Dark Ties are referred to as separate games, they are only sold as one combined game, thus I made this article intending for both games to share. The separate links to each game will be edited later to redirect to this page specifically, as I do not intend to make separate articles for each game.

2. Regarding the reasoning of the page being "too soon", I also don't see how it is too early to make the article for the games, seeing as they release in 3 months from now. Another game, Resident Evil Requiem, also releases in the same month, and has already had an article published, so I fail to see how this reasoning applies to Kiwami 3/DT. If there is something I'm missing here, please clarify. The boss 1904 (talk) 09:41, 9 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Robert McClenon Greetings! I'm not allowed to file a case at WP:DRN? You reverted my case but without explanation how my case was insufficient?. I have discussed matter on article talk page also on user's talk page before coming to DRN. Please elaborate how my case was not suitable or what was missing. Email Khan hazzarvi (talk) 10:10, 10 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Robert McClenon I don't understand how this was improperly filed? [4] I missed the diff link I need to attach diff links of talk page discussions? Where I discussed the matter but was not solved? Email Khan hazzarvi (talk) 10:12, 10 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Email Khan hazzarv - I will explain this here, since you are blanking your user talk page, which is not helpful. There was one main problem with your filing, and lesser problems. As to the main problem, look at the DRN page. Do you see a heading Do you need assistance? and a large blue button Request dispute resolution? Many (not all) noticeboards have such a button. If there is such a button, it is the proper way to file a case. As to the secondary issues, because you tried to reuse an old case as the new case, you gave the case a state date in October 2025. That immediately alerted me that something was wrong. Also, you didn't notify the other editors of the filing. So, if you want to file a DRN case, press the blue button and enter the information. Then notify the other editors that you have filed the case. Be ready for me to ask you exactly what words you want to change in the article. If a noticeboard has a button to file a case, use the button. That's what it's for. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:14, 10 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Nicolette Boele on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 12:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 17:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:IPA pulmonic consonants on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 18:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I received the blanket "Introduction to contentious topics", but I don't understand it. It says that I must refrain from "gaming the system", but that I don't need to refrain for topics that are more than 33 years old. Why is there a cutoff at 33 years? Other pages, like California Genocide, are nominally about a historical event, but are based on racist theories published in the 21st century. Is this noncontentious? Julian in LA (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Julian in LA - I have written an essay, WP:American Politics Contentious Topic Thoughts to try to answer your question. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:37, 19 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I have pinged you to the talk of article thiyya [5]. Please accept the discussion invite College station A&M aggies (talk) 06:54, 19 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

i have recently opened a discussion that you may be interested in

you may see the details here if you so wish Oreocooke (talk) 04:26, 23 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

// hekatlys [talk] 17:01, 23 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Because you participated at the recent RfC on the same topic or the recent ARCA request on the same topic, you are invited to participate in the RfC at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § RfC: Allowing use of AE for community topicwide restrictions. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 23:05, 29 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2024 United States presidential election in Hawaii on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 20:31, 30 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Category talk:Canadian sportspeople by country of descent on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 11:30, 1 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Herzog Park on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 03:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Please cast a pedantic eye over this newly created mainspace article, one which I had previously draftified. I am too close to this to make a valid judgement on AfD vs leave to take its chance. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 12:55, 2 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Timtrent - Okay. I will review its notability in detail. I might take 24 to 48 hours, not meaning that I will spend a day reviewing it, but that I might do other things (including dealing with Lopez de Prado drafts) for a day before I review it. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:10, 2 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

It isn't urgent. Feel free to AfD if necessary, or to let it ride. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 19:19, 2 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Timtrent - I have checked 8 of the 16 sources. It appears that 3 of them satisfy notability. I will check the other 8 sources within a few days, because I want to finish the source assessment, but I know what the answer is. I have marked it as reviewed. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I am grateful. I was concerned that, as a private school, it failed to satisfy our more rigorous current school criteria 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:36, 5 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hey, sorry I missed the parallel AN discussion; I just forgot to look. I'll try to do a better job of remembering to check there when looking at new case filings. Is there an easy way to check every relevant forum at once? ^('"_'⁾ (Mesocarp ) (talk ) _(@) 05:03, 3 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Mesocarp - For various reasons that I don't want to explain on-wiki, that dispute was a case that should not be touched without first verifying from a distance what sort of protective equipment is needed (against - electric shock? radioactivity? biological hazard?). If you enable email, I will describe some of the beans. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:15, 3 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Okay, it should work now I think. Sorry, I realize my email was stale. ^('"_'⁾ (Mesocarp ) (talk ) _(@) 05:24, 3 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Mesocarp - I see that we had what Wikipedia calls a edit conflict between your effort to mediate it and my closure of the case. Since I am a retired computer systems analyst, I call them race conditions. So you inserted your message to the parties at the same time as I closed the thread. For reasons that I have explained to you, I thought that moderated discussion was hopeless. Thank you for trying. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:12, 4 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Yeah, that's okay, and sure thing. ^^ As it happens I'm a programmer and write parallel code regularly so I'm quite familiar with race conditions. :P They do crop up in the "real world" at times like this. ^('"_'⁾ (Mesocarp ) (talk ) _(@) 01:30, 4 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi there. At the end of November, I posted extensive comments on the merge proposal you posted in September. Along with my comments, I also posted a draft of what the suggested merge would look like, here: Talk:Oleg Burlakov#Proposed merge of Burlakov case into Oleg Burlakov. I am bringing the edit request to your attention in case you overlooked my ping to you. Would you kindly have a look at the proposal and help implement the merge? All the best, MarcusEllington90 (talk) 10:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi Robert, I noticed you began reviewing the Draft:Carmela Conroy about two days ago. The review-in-progress template suggests seeking help if it's been unchanged for more than twelve hours, so I wanted to check in. If you're still working on it, no rush—I just wanted to make sure it hadn't slipped through the cracks. If there's anything I can clarify or improve in the draft, I'm happy to help. Thank you for your time volunteering as a reviewer. RiverHouseWriter (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:RiverHouseWriter - It had slipped through the cracks. I had been waiting for a blocking redirect to be deleted, and it had been deleted. I have accepted it now. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

hello, I had a draft that is currently under review under your name. I was hoping to get the result. I attempted to get help from the liberal chat, they told me to ask you directly. Thanks! Red Aviation (talk) 23:04, 4 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Red Aviation - Who is the liberal chat? I have accepted the draft. Who were you asking? Robert McClenon (talk) 23:15, 4 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I didn't check. I'm so sorry, thank you so much for the time and consideration. Apologies. Have a good day! And, sorry, liberal chat is a help chat for Wikipedia editors. Red Aviation (talk) 23:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Red Aviation - No. If you had checked, it would have said I was reviewing it. You reminded me. I know very little about chats. I know that some of them are helpful and some of them have resulted in ArbCom cases. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:25, 4 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I believe they are referring to the #wikipedia-en-help IRC channel, which is hosted on Libera Chat. Tenshi! (Talk page) 11:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi @Robert McClenon!

Please be careful when submitting blanket questions to AELECT candidates. I have removed your question as a monitor action, as it was essentially a repeat of Q1. If you wish to ask for more clarification regarding a particular candidate's answer, please be more specific, as asking (nearly) all candidates to re-answer a standard question isn't conducive to beneficial discussion. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 01:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Chaotic Enby - Well, I disagree that it is a repeat of Q1, but I know that sometimes I am in the minority, and I won't try to argue. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:33, 5 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi @Robert McClenon, I'm just making sure that you're still looking to review my draft since it's been a couple days! Sorry for the bother, and thank you for taking the time to give it a look! Alexishere13 (talk) 11:07, 5 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Alexishere13 - I am not sure how to act on your draft, and I have unset the review flag, and will leave it for another reviewer. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:47, 5 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 20:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi, for your information, as you were involved in the previous discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists or the RfC on consensus of WP:DESTNOT at WT:NOT, I wanted to let you know that the discussed broader RfC has been opened at WP:VPP#RfC - The inclusion of destination lists in Airport articles. If you wish to contribute, please feel free. Many thanks! Danners430 _{tweaks made} 20:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Danners430 - Thank you for trying to do something about this situation. Maybe it will work. If not, you tried. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi there,

I’m just writing to you out of curiosity on why you closed the Battle of Maritsa in the way you did?

As I’ve mentioned previously, I am currently away on holidays, which is why I am inactive on Wikipedia, but I must say that I’m a little surprised by your decision and felt the need to write to you about it.

On the actual TP of the battle in question, every single user (including Aeengath) agreed to Shkodër + a footnote, but Aeengath went back on that and opened up a DRN. However, consensus was already established for ‘Shkodër + footnote’, so the whole process was unnecessary.

I noticed that you asked for a summary of what each side wants in the DRN, which Aeengath in all honesty hijacked and guided without opposition simply because I’m not available to contest it. They made it appear as though there’s agreement for that decision, but if you look at the TP on the Battle of Maritsa, there was not. I would give you links to users agreeing with ‘Shkodër + footnote’ and everything else, but I am writing from my phone and honestly don’t want to spend my holidays debating something which already had a conclusion. I believe @Himaldrmann had the same concerns as I regarding how this was closed.

It’s not too big of a deal, but it is disappointing to see a user somehow claw their way out of a consensus agreement by misguiding a moderator on a DRN. Again, I’m just curious as to how you came to the conclusion that there was consensus for such a change. Did you ever read the TP discussion in full per chance? Botushali (talk) 00:41, 9 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Botushali - I have reopened the DRN case. I have looked through your previous posts for a statement that you are not actively editing Wikipedia, but I am not sure that would have made a difference. I do expect you to make a statement in the reopened case after I finish making a reopening statement. To answer your question about reading the article talk page, I had read the article talk page, and concluded that the discussion was lengthy and inconclusive. I do not always read lengthy and inconclusive prior discussion in detail, because I prefer to mediate disputes starting over, because previous discussion was not useful. So please make a statement as to what you want the article to say, or I will close it again. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:17, 9 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Trial of Michael Jackson on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot ) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 20:31, 9 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi @Robert McClenon, back in April you commented, "If this draft is accepted, it should either take the place of the present disambiguation page, Penn Foster (disambiguation)." I see the reason for the most recent submission decline is: There already is a disambiguation page. If there are no other issues with the article, is it still possible for the article to take the place of the present disambiguation page? DegreeDriven (talk) 19:58, 12 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:DegreeDriven - There needs to be a disambiguation page, because there are three Penn Fosters, and acceptance of the draft would be a fourth. The question is whether the draft can be accepted as Penn Foster and the disambiguation list moved to Penn Foster (disambiguation), or whether the draft should be given some other distinguishing name. If it is accepted, all four articles should be listed. I will look at the draft in more detail again within 48 hours.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:38, 13 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Thank you for another feedback. I have corrected, I hope, the two reference formatting issues you noted in the last review. Regarding the concern about reliable sourcing: should I partially quote the supporting evidence, for example "The NIMH Director described her contributions as a discovery in a 2022 statement", and then place the reference link? Or in the Annual Reports of the Polish Psychiatry Institute, would it help do provide the page number, where the detailed description of the author's research is provided? Walerus (talk) 23:20, 12 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Walerus - I am not sure yet, but it appears to me that the draft is ready for acceptance. Please resubmit the draft and let me know and I will review it. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:41, 13 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Thank you for one more review. I made a cosmetic change, otherwise I resubmit, as you suggested, as is, and will be waiting for further comments. Walerus (talk) 02:28, 13 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Walerus - It isn't submitted yet. Please submit it. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi Robert. I like and agree with your essay, WP:LUDA. I think we both find ourselves contributing to WP:MFD with it as an implicit basis quite regularly.

I've been bold and made some edits to the essay. While essays are not meant to be uniquely-authored, you are the primary author and as a matter of politeness and practicality, I have no objection if you would choose to edit or revert my changes. Martinp (talk) 14:16, 14 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

User:Martinp - If I hadn't welcomed additions and changes, I would have put it in user space. Thanks. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:19, 14 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Robert, thank you for your feedback and help! I have revised the draft to add independent sources and show the company's notability. I would appreciate your review again before resubmitting. Thank you! Draft:Videojet Technologies DL548 (talk) 18:03, 14 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Sorry about the missing BLP references, my fault. I have added three of them. One is a reference about the author (M.D. Czajkowska-Majewska) from the Archive of the Science of Poland, with information about her education (Early life and education section). The second one is the author’s CV from the webpage of the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland (Academic career section). The last one is a listing of the author’s popular publications from the website of the National Library of Poland (Science outreach section). Her research publications can all be found on her included profiles from the open sources: Google Scholar, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, Dimensions. Thank you! Walerus (talk) 20:07, 14 December 2025 (UTC) [reply ]