Steward requests/Global permissions/2023-11

Requests for global IP block exemption

Global IP Block Exempt for איש הישראלי

• Global user: איש הישראלי (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Thadguidry

• Global user: Thadguidry (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Huggums537

• Global user: Huggums537 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Saschaporsche

• Global user: Saschaporsche (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for IWFTest

• Global user: IWFTest (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for cjesch

• Global user: cjesch (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Mardetanha

• Global user: Mardetanha (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Ibjaja055

• Global user: Ibjaja055 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Dr.üsenfieber

• Global user: Dr.üsenfieber (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for pictorex

• Global user: pictorex (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Quintolus

• Global user: Quintolus (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for ELSTEINH

• Global user: ELSTEINH (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for oliodisemini

• Global user: oliodisemini (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for কুউ পুলক

• Global user: কুউ পুলক (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Antiquary

• Global user: Antiquary (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Jakub Moc

• Global user: Jakub Moc (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Jerome Samson

• Global user: Jerome Samson (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for bellenion

• Global user: bellenion (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for juliah92

• Global user: juliah92 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for LogicodeDevProt

• Global user: LogicodeDevProt (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Rappos

• Global user: Rappos (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for 8atrk8nn

• Global user: 8atrk8nn (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Dustfreeworld

• Global user: Dustfreeworld (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions

2FA Tester for Madman7814

• Global user: Madman7814 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Matrix

• Global user: Matrix (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Hao Tian22

• Global user: Hao Tian22 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Voorts

• Global user: Voorts (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Janui

• Global user: Janui (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

I would like to participate the 2FA test as I try to use 2FA where ever possible. I was surprised that this is already activated for dev accounts thanks in advance

2FA Tester for HeftyIbis

• Global user: HeftyIbis (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for 5lack3r-news

• Global user: 5lack3r-news (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

I'm experienced in seeting a 2FA active and writing down the Backup Keys. I want to increase security for my account, thanks.

2FA Tester for User toolbox

• Global user: User toolbox (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for 2NumForIce on The Go

• Global user: 2NumForIce on The Go (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Zippybonzo

• Global user: Zippybonzo (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for JrandWP

• Global user: JrandWP (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Matrix

• Global user: Matrix (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Volgar

• Global user: Volgar (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for LemonSlushie

• Global user: LemonSlushie (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Requests for global rollback permissions

Global rollback for Saroj

Not ending before 5 November 2023 07:49 UTC

As abuse filters sometimes affect my anti-vandalism work, this access would make my work easier. --Saroj (talk) 07:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

• Support Support LGTM. --LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 08:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support no concerns --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 09:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 11:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Thanks for volunteering —MdsShakil (talk) 12:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Syunsyunminmin 🗨️talk 12:50, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 18:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support --Ferien (talk) 18:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Definately. Well more than enough xwiki activity to support a need for the bit. Will do a good job: needs the flag, I'm impressed with the number of small wikis with high action counts. fr33k man 19:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support as he's a trusted user. 64andtim (talk to me) 20:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support --Tmv (talk) 22:58, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Valid reason, support. Leaderboard (talk) 09:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support -FASTILY 09:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support XXBlackburnXx (talk) 09:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support – DreamRimmer (talk ) 09:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support--WikiBayer 👤💬 10:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
• -J. Ansari Talk 14:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Neriah - 💬 - 22:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support- Trused user, sysop on three wikis and enough Crosswiki activity ;No concern, keep up your work. :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support no concerns -- DARIO SEVERI (talk) 08:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Done There's consensus to promote. @Saroj: Remember to log-out and login again on SWViewer to update your flags. Congratulations! --Superpes15 (talk) 09:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Global rollback for Leonidlednev

Reason for request: I think that I am experienced enough in fighting vandalism to get the global rollback permission.

Not ending before 4 November 2023 21:37 UTC

• Support Support Very convincing. ~~~~
  User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:20, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

  Probably consider this Neutral Neutral per WikiBayer below. ~~~~
  User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

• Support Support Finally! XXBlackburnXx (talk) 22:51, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Thanks for volunteering! – DreamRimmer (talk ) 01:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Weren't you already GR? --LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 08:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

  Nope, I wasn't. --Leonidlednev (talk) 15:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

• Support Support LGTM --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 09:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Syunsyunminmin 🗨️talk 12:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• No reason, no support (update: the statement added belatedly isn't convincing - you don't need to go too much into depth and this is not meant to be challenging - but given the presence of anti-vandalism tools that anyone can use, I do require some reasoning on why you specifically need GR). Leaderboard (talk) 14:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose Not really convinced without statement. I think for this right which is truly global, a certain degree of communication is required, and this clearly demonstrate a lack of that.--BRP ^ever 15:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

  I will still keep the oppose. They clearly need more experience. Many projects expect rollbackers to act in a more competent manner. For instance, if someone were to request RB without a statement on my homewiki, it's unlikely to be approved. Not really a fan of tug-of-war with LTAs and trolls but, it's not the biggest reason for my oppose. Thanks, -- BRP ^ever 11:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

• Support Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 18:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose to Strong oppose I was not at all impressed by the lack of nomination statement right up until an oppose vote was made over it. I get there's not much to put in nomination statements for GR, and GR shouldn't be a huge deal, but giving no reason at all gives me the impression that you just expect to be given the right on request. And unfortunately, most of what I have been seeing from this editor is just edit warring with LTAs, which is not the experience I'm after – global rollback exists to clear up vandalism, not flood page histories with edit warring. --Ferien (talk) 18:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

  Comment Comment to @Ferien: due to my first and only declined request in which many have decided to oppose, I've learned that I shouldn't edit war or otherwise disrupt to revert so much cross-wiki vandalism, and I'm in the middle ground between support (Leonidlednev is a trusted user) and oppose (their edit count might be somewhat low than expected, which is around 15,000 edits or more to all Wikimedia projects). 64andtim (talk to me) 20:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

  Edit warring on its own is a problem but if they have stopped doing it, then it's not an issue. In this case it seems they have been doing it despite being asked to stop, which again demonstrates a lack of communication per BRP above. --Ferien (talk) 08:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

  About that for example, if you see a cross-wiki IP that makes many edits to a page including the same page on many wikis, and you revert no more than three times, then does that mean you're not edit warring? I was making sure that if I do another GR request, the community would trust me as I wouldn't abuse the tool. And I review the abuse log on Meta for possible vandalism on various wikis. 64andtim (talk to me) 15:47, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

• Support Support I've seen enough xwiki actions and trust the user enough to support getting the global rollback bit. fr33k man 19:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Weak oppose per my statement replying to Ferien. While I would support you as you are a trusted user, I'm opposing as you may or may not have edit warred to revert vandalism or spam, and your edit count might be somewhat low than expected. 64andtim (talk to me) 20:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
• Neutral Neutral [3] Rollbacks are useless with this goofball , without countermeasures like changes to abuse filters, blocks or protects. I have repeatedly seen that you have led editwars on different pages and projekts, olthough you did not have the ability to take countermeasures. This flooding of the version history with always the same vandalism is not very helpful. These trolls should be left to those who can take countermeasures. --WikiBayer 👤💬 23:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

  The ability to quickly undo drive-by vandalism is pretty useful given my experience. I can see how it'd feel less useful when one of the billion LTAs here loads up a proxy list and starts rapidly editing, but being able to instantly revert their edits in one action isn't useless. Deauthorized (talk) 02:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

  If you revert the same thing 8, 9, 10 times in a row rapidly, it is certainly useless. Your edits end up flooding recent changes and the history of the page. And when you're dealing with revdellable/oversightable revisions on small wikis, by doing this you're actually causing more damage than doing good. --Ferien (talk) 08:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

  About the "revdellable" thing, that may include some specific IPs that likes to post on talk pages something related to Stalin, and when someone reverts it, the IP reverts it and posts harmful edit summaries, and instead I believe that someone should only revert it once or twice (not four or seven times in the same page) and deny recognition, waiting for an admin or steward to handle the IP. 64andtim (talk to me) 15:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

  I agree with the criticism, I should revert less and ask for page protection if the vandalism persists instead. --Leonidlednev (talk) 07:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

• Support Support trusted user, no concerns. --Mtarch11 (talk) 01:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose I don't think that a lack of the statement and a small number of total global edits is a problem if you have experience with undo. But this cannot be overlooked: you use Twinkle 7 times in 30 minutes on the same page. (Tmv (talk) 07:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per above. Concerns with experience & communication skills -FASTILY 09:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support I don't see problems with the short statement in this case, even if in general I don't like it and probably it's better to specify clearly the reasons why someone asks for a flag (also to introduce yourself if some users don't know you), because I think that, in this case, the user's activity speaks more. I noticed that this lack of verbosity doesn't seem, at least to me, to be a lack of communication skills and I remember (as BRPever already said) that it's essential, when acting on multiple projects, to have the ability to communicate properly and accept advice or criticism. Regarding the issue of edit wars with vandals, I've always said that we, as global patrollers, need to understand when it's time to report and leave the vandal alone, however in this case I don't see it as an obstacle to the GR flag. I've noticed that even some users who are already GRs engage in edit wars with the LTAs, I repeat, the skill in my opinion is to understand when the reverts are exaggerated, so as not to clog up the history and the RC, and wait for a block (during the patrolling we don't have to think about number of edits or statistics that count for absolutely nothing on wiki - so compulsively reversing a compulsive LTA does not provide greater experience). Leonidlednev seems a good patroller to me and I don't think they will have any problems in understanding this! The flag can only be useful to their activity imho and that's why I fully support the request. For me the benefits outweigh the doubts. I hope that, if the flag is granted, Leonidlednev would pay attention to the comments that have arisen here and I'm sure they would never abuse the flags! If, instead, there will be no consensus for the flag, I hope that Leonidlednev will take advantage of the opinions that have emerged, and continue to work, improving themselves thanks to the advice, and then they can ask for the flag again after some months --Superpes15 (talk) 09:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

  Yeah, I agree that my edit-warring with LTAs is not really wanted here, so I will only revert them once, or maybe twice. --Leonidlednev (talk) 04:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

  @Leonidlednev: Thanks for your confirmation. I confirm my support. Remember that it's very important to communicate properly when needed! Superpes15 (talk) 09:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

  Thanks. --Leonidlednev (talk) 21:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

• Support Support I've seen Leonidlednev fighting vandalism on my homewiki many times. I partially agree with the comments that sometimes fighting in same pages wars against LTAs, however may you see that similar situations can also be made by long-term experienced users with rollback rights on local wikis. In my opinion, the benefits of Leonidlednev to xwikis will more with global rollback right if Leonidlednev consider these comments. --Uncitoyen ^talk 18:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

  So far I have seen no response to any comments regarding this concern by the requester. ~~~~
  User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

  Actually, I thought active anti-vandalism works overweigh the concern mentioned by some users, but now this point makes me worried. LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 17:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

  +1 on 1234qwer and LR0725 Superpes15 (talk) 17:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

  Although I understand your points, I hope the user will pay attention according to last message. --Uncitoyen ^talk 20:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

• Neutral Neutral I agree with the concerns raised above. Neriah - 💬 - 23:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per BRPever. I'm sorry, but if you asked me for patroller rights on my home wiki with excessive brevity, it's not very convincing. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 10:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

There were concerns raised in the discussion, but as the user eventually responded and agreed with the criticism, I am happy to consider the issue resolved. Given this and the overall positive assessment of their counter-vandalism work, Done. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Base (talk) 10:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Global rollback for Guycn2

• Global user: Guycn2 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global rollback for 511KeV

Not ending before 18 November 2023 17:54 UTC

Hello, I'm actively volunteering with the SWMT to combat cross-wiki vandalism. While I currently utilize the undo button to address instances of vandalism across various projects, its effectiveness diminishes in cases of multiple edit vandalism. Hence, I am seeking access to the global rollback tool to enhance my capabilities in anti-vandalism efforts. I understand the importance of using this tool judiciously and commit to doing so. Drawing from my experience on En Wiki and Ks Wiki, I am confident in navigating its usage responsibly. I pledge to adhere strictly to the guidelines outlined in the Global rollback policy, recognizing that any misuse may lead to the revocation of these rights and, in severe cases, result in a block. Thankyou. _signed, 511KeV ^(talk) 17:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

• Neutral Neutral I don't see enough cross-wiki anti-vandalism work to support. – DreamRimmer (talk ) 18:15, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
• Weak support - contributions are on the low side, and activity is relatively infrequent for getting new global rights, but reverts look good and the candidate has clearly demonstrated the ability to revert across language barriers. – Ajraddatz (talk) 21:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
• I've seen the candidate around, but looking at their crossactivity, they only seem to have resumed their cross-wiki efforts this month. I'd suggest they continue patrolling for some more 2 – 3 months to gain some additional experience with the various wikis, after which I'd probably be willing to support. ~~~~
  User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
• Neutral Neutral Trusted user, but not enough xwiki contributions. --LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 00:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support I think we are being too strict with global rollback permissions oftentimes. If users have shown a good amount of xwiki contributions + good use of rollback and other advanced permissions at different local projects, I see no reason not to support. --Johannnes89 (talk) 07:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Johannnes89 --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 09:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support - you have a valid reason and your edit matrix, while on the lower side, is also reasonable. So a yes from me. While I understand 1234qwer1234qwer4's perspective, I don't think waiting in this case is necessary. Leaderboard (talk) 15:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Crosswiki activity is on the lower side, but I have no concerns --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support per Leaderboard. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (^talk ) 17:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support Would be easier to support with more crosswiki experience, but otherwise I have no reason to oppose. --V0lkanic (talk) 22:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support This is GR, not GS. The low x-wiki contributions don't really bother me. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 07:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support Not enough Crosswiki activity but Trusted -J. Ansari Talk 14:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Just about enough xwiki activity for me. --Ferien (talk) 16:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
• Neutral Neutral Neriah - 💬 - 21:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
• Neutral Neutral Nadzik (talk) 15:56, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Competent enough for me – Ammarpad (talk) 18:06, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support per above. Good enough for GR in my opinion, see no concerns. --Borschts ^Talk 12:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 13:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support —MdsShakil (talk) 13:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Jianhui67 ^{talk ★contribs} 16:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support -FASTILY 08:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support obviously very new to cross-wiki monitoring but I could not find single wrong revert--reNVoy (user talk) 14:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

  Hello @Renvoy, I need to confess that in the past, I mistakenly reversed a user's edit. I came to know about it when they left a message on my talk page. _signed, 511KeV ^(talk) 16:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

  @511KeV I should have said that I checked your edits in Slavic and Baltic-language projects, still all good reNVoy (user talk) 16:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

• Done There's enough community consensus and there was no opposition. I'm confident that @511KeV: will make good use of the flag, despite their not huge crosswiki experience, so I recommend that they be even more careful when using the global rollback rights at first. But in any case there are absolutely no issues! Congratulations! --Superpes15 (talk) 23:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Requests for other global permissions

remove global VRT permissions agents for Gratus

• Global user: Gratus (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

remove global VRT permissions agents for Hide on Rosé

• Global user: Hide on Rosé (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Requests for global sysop permissions

Global sysop for LR0725

Not ending before 22 November 2023 05:54 UTC

Hello, I am here to request global sysop permission. I'm now working for global rollbacker, Korean Wikipedia sysop, and Korean Wikisource sysop. When dealing with many LTAs, I feel that I need to block that LTA accounts or IPs or protect pages on small wikis, which are vulnerable for vandalism especially.

Also, I am patrolling all the other Korean Wikimedia projects (wiktionary, wikiquote, wikibooks, and wikinews) regularly, and LTAs at Korean Wikipedia sometimes make vandalism on other projects, too. There is 1 sysop for each projects, but kowiktionary doesn't have any sysop currently. It is hard to create appropriate admin vote as there is no active user now, so I want to patrol small wikis and Korean Wikimedia projects by gaining global sysop permission. Thanks for your consideration!

You can see my works as sysop if you want: kowiki, kowikisource. --LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 05:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

I read GS page several times and enabled 2FA. Thanks! LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 06:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

• Support Strong support Based on his contributions and experience, I have no concerns about this request. Good luck! --1108-Kiju/Talk 06:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
• (削除) Weak oppose (削除ここまで) I would like to see a bit more involvement in non-Korean wikis first, but I'm willing to be swayed. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 07:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

  @SHB2000: Maybe you can see my CA, mainly small wikis. :) LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 07:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

  Fair enough – I'll see what others think. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 07:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Struck my vote and will Support Support – I'm swayed. Thanks for volunteering. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 20:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

• Support Support Crossactivity seems good to me and I generally don't see any other issues. --V0lkanic (talk) 09:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Excellent contributor. Thanks for volunteering.–TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 12:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support - edit matrix is OK and it is clear that this person can help outside Korean wikis. Leaderboard (talk) 12:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Why not! – DreamRimmer (talk ) 14:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Sure. Good sysop work and quick learner from what I’ve seen. No concerns. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 18:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support --Alaa :)..! 20:46, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support - nihil obstat. Excellent patrolling skills and crosswiki activity. #prodraxis ^connect 01:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Strong support as you're a trusted global contributor, many thanks for volunteering in fighting vandalism and spam. 64andtim (talk to me) 06:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support: fine --M/ (talk) 06:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support trusted user. --Mtarch11 (talk) 06:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support LGTM. Thanks for volunteering —MdsShakil (talk) 06:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support --Saroj (talk) 07:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support no concerns --Ameisenigel (talk) 09:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support --Johannnes89 (talk) 09:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support – Toadette (chat) 09:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support - Active xwiki patroller, the GS tools would help them a lot.--*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 10:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Very high crosswiki activity, trusted user with experience using the tools elsewhere. fr33k man 19:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Trusted. Lemonaka (talk) 02:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support – Ammarpad (talk) 07:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support LGTM --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 12:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Active xwiki contributor. --Uncitoyen ^talk 19:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Jianhui67 ^{talk ★contribs} 10:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support --20041027 tatsu(talk) 10:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Trusted user, LGTM —Borschts ^Talk 13:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Have seen them around a lot, no reason not to support! --Ferien (talk) 21:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Good luck! --Tmv (talk) 05:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support Nadzik (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support--Chqaz (talk) 14:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support -FASTILY 06:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support--Turkmen ^talk 13:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support. --NGC 54 (talk|contribs) 14:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose Strong Oppose Many abuses of file renaming rights on Commons (see user's talk page there).--Anatoliy (talk) 14:31, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

  Is this related to global sysop, chasing vandalism? This is quite embarrasing. But regardless of global sysop, that was serious mistake, sorry. I forgot it. (I was making reply to your opinion) :) LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 14:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

  Related. Global sysop permission includes movefile right.--Anatoliy (talk) 14:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

  Well, I already have commons filemover right, so never mind about that. If I loss commons filemover permission, I won't use movefile at commons, since I cannot be sure about flag usage myself. --LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 14:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

  FTR, Commons is not a GS wiki. ~~~~
  User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

  Ah, that's right. Anyway, commons issue doesn't matter so much. I will pay attention at commons regardless of GS. LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 01:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

• Support Support -J. Ansari Talk 15:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support Neriah - 💬 - 21:41, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 13:25, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
• Neutral Neutral Sorry but I do not feel like fully supporting you at the time. Most of your global edits seem to be renamings and most of the recent requests to GS concerned mostly Korean projects. Also, I recalled that couple of your deletion requests concerning other wikis were declined. Citing message from Sotiale to you: "Global activities may be more unwritten than those carved in stone. So it is not easy and will take a lot of time.", I think you need a bit more time.--reNVoy (user talk) 15:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

  If you felt so, I respect it. Thanks! LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 23:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

• Support Support --ginaan (T/C) 12:02, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
• Support Support CSR2Forever (talk) 08:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Done Clear consensus to promote. Congratulations! Pinging @Martin Urbanec: for ML and IRC stuff. --Superpes15 (talk) 10:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)