Steward requests/Global permissions/2025-01

Requests for global IP block exemption

Global IP Block Exempt for Jopparn

• Global user: Jopparn (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Matthiasb

• Global user: Matthiasb (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Yugaminena

• Global user: Yugaminena (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Kuzzim

• Global user: Kuzzim (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Papuass

• Global user: Papuass (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Abdansykr26

• Global user: Abdansykr26 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Huimao28

• Global user: Huimao28 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for .hecko

• Global user: .hecko (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Tongngoucheong

• Global user: Tongngoucheong (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for 今紫

• Global user: 今紫 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for mieliestronk

• Global user: mieliestronk (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Ashley Graves

• Global user: Ashley Graves (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Cagliost

• Global user: Cagliost (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Nicolas Tintenial

• Global user: Nicolas Tintenial (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Maarten Jansen

• Global user: Maarten Jansen (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Felixbecker2

• Global user: Felixbecker2 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for alachuckthebuck

• Global user: alachuckthebuck (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Bartositges

• Global user: Bartositges (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for ThunderGit

• Global user: ThunderGit (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for Silver Dovelet

• Global user: Silver Dovelet (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for MykolaHK

• Global user: MykolaHK (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for OreoTwice

• Global user: OreoTwice (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP Block Exempt for netze

• Global user: netze (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Pigsonthewing

• Global user: Pigsonthewing (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Global IP block exempt for Félix ALLEBOSCH

• Global user: Félix ALLEBOSCH (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Requests for global rename permissions

Global rename for Svartava

Not ending before 28 December 2024 10:38 UTC

Hi, I would like to apply for global renamer permissions. My languages are hi-N, en-4, sa-2, pra-1. I have some basic understanding of other Indic languages like gu, mr, pa, bn, etc. due to interest in comparative historical linguistics and having enwiktionary as homewiki, as well as some Romance languages like fr, es; which I think would be useful for this right when dealing with usernames. Thanks, – Svārtava (t ɕ) 10:38, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

• (削除) Support Support No concerns. (削除ここまで) (削除) changing to Neutral Neutral (削除ここまで) per SHB2000. But thanks for your contributions. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 10:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

  Okay, I am rechanging my vote to Oppose Oppose. I hope Svartava will take the comments on the concerns raised as advice. By changing my vote again, I am trying to make an opportunity for Svartava to prove him/herself, so that they can prove that they're no longer involved with the concerns raised.–TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 17:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 11:03, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support (削除ここまで)--A09 |(pogovor) 11:48, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

  It doesn't happen often, but I became aware of the hat collecting this user has at the moment. While GREN isn't as critical as other global perms, I'm afraid they have not shown yet the need for the tools. Hence, changing to Oppose Oppose, but you have my moral support and would likely support in the future.--A09 |(pogovor) 12:53, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

  Although I realize that the RFA was too soon and I fully accept the mistake, I disagree with the hat collecting accusation that I have not shown any need for the tools. – Svārtava (t ɕ) 13:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

• (削除) Support Support No issues and very multilingual; thanks for volunteering! --SHB2000 (t • c) 11:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC) (削除ここまで)
  • Changing to Oppose Oppose given this is the 2nd of 3 advanced perm requests within 45 days now that Meta:Requests for adminship/Svartava has come about; sorry, but I cannot support someone who is rapidly collecting advanced perms within such a short period. --SHB2000 (t • c) 10:52, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support (削除ここまで) HouseBlaster (talk) 17:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Upgrading to Strong support Strong support, I fully agree with Leaderboard. Denying this request feels overly punitive to me. They definitely have the language skills, and GREN is not a super risky global permission. HouseBlaster (talk) 18:26, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support (削除ここまで) Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 19:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
  • I confirm my vote, per Ajraddatz and ToadetteEdit. It would not be appropriate for me to oppose it just for this reason. So Strong support Strong support for moral support. Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 00:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:18, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

  I think some of the hat collection concerns are overblown here. I do agree the Meta RfA was a bit quick, but I'm not sure if that really negates trust for this role. I'd of course recommend that the candidate slow down, but I see no reason to move to the oppose camp here, there's no evidence that these permissions would be misused. – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:59, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 19:48, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support. (削除ここまで) Codename Noreste 🤔 Talk 20:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

(削除) Changed to Neutral neutral because of your recent but withdrawn RfA, as SHB2000's and TenWhile's objections are relevant. (削除ここまで) I would definitely advise to slow down and to never hat collect for advanced permissions. However, you still have my moral support. Codename Noreste (talk) 19:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Now changed one more time as a weak support, on second thought. Please take my advice above seriously, but you still have my moral support and my vote. You are not punished by other users but scrutinized because of the withdrawn RfA. Remember to take it slow with the sysop experience you can gain on a content project. Thank you for voluteering on the Wikimedia movement. Codename Noreste (talk) 20:33, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

• (削除) Support Support --TenWhile6 00:46, 15 December 2024 (UTC) (削除ここまで)
  • Oppose Oppose per SHB2000. Imo you should familiarize yourself with local sysop first, not add GRN and Meta-Admin one month later. (detailed explanation) --TenWhile6 10:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Good luck. Borhan (talk) 05:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

  Reconfirming my support vote per Ajraddatz. Borhan (talk) 05:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 07:36, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support —MdsShakil (talk) 11:28, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Ternera (talk) 14:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

  Reconfirming my support vote here, per Ajraddatz. Ternera (talk) 15:05, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support I was slightly puzzled by wikt:Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2024-10/User:Svartava for admin#Decision but it does not seem to be a dealbreaker, and other than that I do not have any concerns. ~~~~
  User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:57, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

  (Reconfirming this per Ajraddatz essentially. I was going to do this after SHB's comment, but I figured there would be a slight chance of this not receiving the amount of attention it did.) ~~~~
  User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 00:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support per 1234qwer. Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:13, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support DARIO SEVERI (talk) 13:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support – Leo ^? 14:15, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support —Aopou {discusión} 23:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC) (削除ここまで)
  • Oppose Oppose per SHB2000. —Aopou {discusión} 21:31, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:39, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  Reconfirming my vote, apparently people began to change their votes due to the (削除) current (削除ここまで) very recent meta RfA by the subject. It seems more worrying like hat collecting, but I will not change my vote for the sake of the competency of the user. But I advise you to slow down and reconsider before this goes too far, because at this point some of the users will change their opinions, and therefore, this candidacy will be a 50/50 chance by four days of the request running. ToadetteEdit (talk) 12:31, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support --Wüstenspringmaus _talk 16:15, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Jianhui67 ^{talk ★contribs} 08:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 13:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support.--HakanIST (talk) 06:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support –FlyingAce ^✈hello 00:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --Ferien (talk) 00:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support Horcus (talk) 08:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC) (削除ここまで)
  • (削除) Oppose Oppose per SHB2000. Horcus (talk) 00:05, 25 December 2024 (UTC) (削除ここまで)

  Striking vote after steward discussion, as a likely sockpuppet or meatpuppet. EPIC (talk) 00:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose Oppose per SHB2000. AramilFeraxa (Talk) 13:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

  I'd like to respond to the opposition that was caused by my too soon RFA request. I acknowledge that I was wrong in doing that but I would still like to help with renamings like initially stated in this GRN request.

  I am considering withdrawing but since only four days are remaining we can let it complete it's course. – Svārtava (t ɕ) 13:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support - while I did feel like 3 advanced rights in 45 days was too fast, the OP has withdrawn one of them, and I do not see any benefit in "punishing" the user further. Leaderboard (talk) 13:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

  It was never about "punishing" the user; permissions aren't anyone's rights and as A09 mentioned above, "they have not shown yet the need for the tools." --SHB2000 (t • c) 22:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

  To be fair, what can they show? Someone applies for GR because they want to rename usernames... Leaderboard (talk) 03:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

  I want to tell you two points: 1) You said that you weren't intending to punish the user, but by you (followed by others) opposing the RFA and changing to oppose in this candidacy is purely punitive in people's eyes. 2) How can it be that they have not shown the need for the tools? We can assume that if we granted the right to them, they would process the special:globalrenamequeue. While global renamers with Indic-language roots are always needed, I see no reason why we should oppose considering that they will not misuse the tool. As said, I am not convinced of the drama that you aroused yesterday. ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

  In what world is a change in vote considered punitive? I've tried avoid using this term for the better or worse, but I'll say it: hat collectors more or less cause more problems, and if requesting three significant advanced perms within 2 months is not an example of blatant hat collecting, then I don't know what is. I don't trust hat collectors because what's to say that you'd just process a few renames and then stop using the tool. GRN is still a rather sensitive permission and should only be for trusted users...and hat collecting is not a sign of trust; rather it gives the opposite impression.

  As for "As said, I [Toadette] am not convinced of the drama that you [SHB] aroused yesterday", I didn't know opposing an RfA and catching a user's red flags is the equivalent of starting drama. Not to mention the fact that OP had the choice to not rapidly request permissions – they very much had their chance to let this request pass, but instead they blew it. Not my problem for bringing up red flags, really. --SHB2000 (t • c) 07:55, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

  @SHB2000: So to be clear, am I correct in understanding that the opposition to this particular GRN request is because of the RFA yesterday and the requesting rights in less time gives you the concern that I might be collecting them instead of actually intending to use them?

  Before the RFA there didn't seem to be so much opposition and as I can see there are a few precedents of getting GRN within two months of local sysop and I don't think I will process a few renames and then stop using it since I am fairly active to check rename requests frequently. – Svārtava (t ɕ) 09:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

  If one is going to oppose a request and change their opinion in another is like they are not wanting to have the other userright that is succeeding be given to the candidate just because of the former request, therefore, the user feels a bit discouraged. Would you block a user just because they were recently unjustly blocked, and their contributions are in good faith? I know that you dislike hat collectors, but I believe in this case your sentiment began to drive users into changing their opinions, causing unnecessary drama, and so this will be 50/50 by three days. I do not want to make this discussion go deeper, just saying. ToadetteEdit (talk) 11:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

  The hat collecting accusations are definitely discouraging. I don't mind if someone opposes on the grounds that I need more experience or points out any of my actions that are concerning to them and I am willing to learn from mistakes.

  Assuming that the requests are not in good faith is not appreciable. – Svārtava (t ɕ) 12:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

  And people changing their opinions...is a bad thing? There is a clear difference between hat collecting and user blocks, so no, they're not comparable; again, what you call "causing unnecessary drama" is entirely on OP who had the choice to not request 3 advanced perms within 2 months. If anything, OP's insistence that their behaviour was not hat collecting (twice now, even though what was done was pretty indefensible) is also enough for me to oppose this request. --SHB2000 (t • c) 12:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

  I have to agree with the OP here. The most in terms of the mistakes OP did was think that it's OK to get three advanced rights in 45 days. Pointed out that was not correct, and fine, they withdrew. People can change their opinion, but the grounds for the change is what made the OP unhappy. Getting two advanced rights in 45 days isn't what most would call hat-collecting, and my experience is that we start to call someone a hat-collector when they have requested many rights in a short period of time (and refused, usually) - this isn't the case with this user. SHB2000 didn't do anything wrong by pointing out the problem - people blindly changing their opinions and accusing the OP of hat-collecting just because of this is. Also: what is the community going to gain by having the OP wait for a few months for no reason? Leaderboard (talk) 13:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

  If the OP didn't started the RFA, we wouldn't be discussing this right now. I am not blaming you, but telling you in good faith that the OP and yourself didn't do anything wrong. In fact, nobody did not do anything wrong. By the way, the fact that users did change their opinion due to the OP being a hat collector, and that your sentiment is the base of others' changed opinion should not be related to the actual need for the tools shown by this editor, which is valid. As I said, I do not want to further deepen the discussion, so let this be the last. My apologies if I said something wrong, as I do not intend to accuse anyone involved. We should generally not bring up other requests for permissions, but I should agree with what it is said above. ToadetteEdit (talk) 14:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

  If no one did ever anything wrong, why are you problematising it? Points have been made, and no one is trying to punish Svartava. Everybody is entitled to their own opinion, but a fair informing is expected, hence changes in votes are not some extraordinary action. A09 |(pogovor) 15:15, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose Oppose Sorry but I tend to agree with what TenWhile6 has said already. _signed, Aafi ^(talk) 14:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per above. Hasan (talk) 16:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support XXBlackburnXx (talk) 12:30, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support I've read read here many suggestions, still I'd like to add in a low voice my own appreciation for users' 30000 edits in three years, for their x-wiki commitment and I'd also wish them a good continuation of their work. Thanks, --M/ (talk) 14:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support I'm not convinced by the opposing reason. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support per Ajraddatz. I think the user is still trusted for these permissions despite the ill-timed RfA. --Pólux (talk) 17:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Pretty confident they would be a net positive with their rights, given their linguistic background and overall competency. Not too concerned about the meta RfA which was, in my eyes, in good faith and reasonable motivation, even if a tad too soon. Do take your time to familiarize yourself with the current permissions (and GRN if this request passes) and I am sure you'll be fine. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 21:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:45, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support Trusted user;No concerns--- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 12:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose, per SHB2000. --Kadı Message 19:51, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
• Weak support I think Svartava should carefully evaluate the comments here. -- kızıl message 10:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
• Weak support I advise you to slow down, but I believe you have learned from your other requests and there is no point in denying this one. --Jan Myšák (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support Trusted User. -J. Ansari Talk 09:20, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 13:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Not done Unfortunately, in this request we have 32 supports and 9 opposes, which gives a support ratio of around 78%. As the 80% support requirement is not met, this request is ultimately unsuccessful. Svartava, thank you for volunteering, don't feel discouraged by the outcome and feel free to re-apply in the future. EPIC (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

I thank everyone for their time. I am sincerely grateful to all those who kept their faith in me and I will take the lessons from this request to improve myself and continue doing contributions for the projects. Svārtava (t ɕ) 16:56, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

I have once again placed this request on hold, as some doubts have come up regarding an opposing vote. If it is struck then it would also mean that this request would meet the 80% support requirements, and can thus be evaluated from there. EPIC (talk) 22:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Uh, sorry EPIC, but I am counting 9 opposes which are not struck. A09, Kadi, me, Hasan, Aafi, Horcus, Aopou, SHB, Aramil. Besides that, 80% + consensus is needed to promote, and imo it‘s arguable that this doesn‘t show consensus even if it would be just 8 opposes due to the fact that all opposes are pointing out one single big issue. --TenWhile6 23:08, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Indeed there are 9 opposes - and in this case it's one of them that is being discussed (i.e it has not yet been striked, but if it is, then this request would meet the support requirements and would therefore need be evaluated from there instead). I had therefore placed this on hold for internal discussion, and it will be re-closed in some time. EPIC (talk) 23:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Okay, then I misunderstood you, sorry. --TenWhile6 23:16, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

When EPIC asked about this in a private chat, I suggested that the request be closed as not done as the policy requirement of 80% support had not been met. Given the concerns with one of the opposes, I think there is a case to be made that the 80% requirement has been met. The decision to grant or not grant the permissions would then rest on whether there is consensus to promote. Given that none of the arguments against deal specifically with how the user would use these permissions (although some tangentially get at that), I think there could be consensus, but as I voted I will of course leave it to another colleague. Either way, absent new facts this request should be closed one way or the other. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:13, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Update, Tanbiruzzaman switched to oppose, about two hours ago, that would make the support below 80%, but I would like to make some points. Although, as the candidate myself, I am a partisan here, please allow me to write a final post.

• By the hard 80% support requirement, this request is a vote, thus I believe switching so late when the request is on hold and decision is close to reaching, is unfair to the candidate. Additionally, the vote switch was explicitly stated to be of the purpose to make an opportunity for me to prove myself, i.e. it was made clearly made just to stop this request from passing at the end moment, which I don't see how it is fair.
• If it would be a "non-vote" discussion, this is fine, but in that case, the opposing arguments have been fully addressed: Getting two advanced rights in 45 days isn't what most would call hat-collecting; How can it be that they have not shown the need for the tools? We can assume that if we granted the right to them, they would process the special:globalrenamequeue ; what is the community going to gain by having the OP wait for a few months for no reason?
• The opposers have clearly voted so because of hat-collecting concern - SHB2000 went on to even say: OP's insistence that their behaviour was not hat collecting (twice now, even though what was done was pretty indefensible) is also enough for me to oppose this request which reflects assumption of bad faith. I invite you to judge by my Meta contributions and see if my Meta RFA (which I agree was bit too soon) was made to collect the right without having any use for it.
• Finally, I believe I have shown sufficient cross-wiki trust to not misuse the permissions, and it is seen that the request was well-passing before the Meta RFA came in.

With this, I rest my case and trust the decision of stewards. Svārtava (t ɕ) 19:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

(Noting that this is still being discussed, at the moment. A final decision will be enacted in some time.) EPIC (talk) 19:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

I don't think the switch to oppose counts, as it was done after the request was placed on hold. Leaderboard (talk) 04:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Considering the controversy around this request, it has been re-closed as Not done after discussion among stewards. This decision is regardless of whether the disputed opposes are taken into account or not. With that being said, once again, thank you for volunteering, and feel free to once again run in the future, with the opposition taken into account. EPIC (talk) 21:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Global rename for Aopou

Not ending before 1 January 2025 23:26 UTC

Hello, everyone. I am a Wikipedian contributing to the Spanish Wikipedia. My roles there include Rollbacker, Reviewer, Template Editor, and Rollbacker on Wikidata, among other local responsibilities. My native language is Spanish, and I have strong proficiency in English, French, Portuguese, Italian and Arabic. The purpose of my request is to broaden my involvement within Wikimedia Foundation projects, without necessarily limiting myself to being a local contributor on Wikipedia.

I am aware that many prefer candidates to have prior experience as sysops, but honestly, my local Wikipedia often judges users harshly during candidacies. We are losing more administrators due to poor management. Most candidacies fail to gain sufficient support and are often judged for minor mistakes, sometimes dating back years. This has been acknowledged by a former administrator of Spanish Wikipedia, who expressed similar concerns.

Additionally, I couldn’t participate in the local renaming process on my Wikipedia because the renamers there do not allow collaboration or responses—it is, unfortunately, a space controlled exclusively by them. For these reasons, I am submitting my request to collaborate more broadly and to contribute with my language skills to support the Wikimedia community. This text was modified on December 25, 2024 to make a clarification that may not have been understood in the answers. —Aopou {discusión} 23:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Neutral Neutral - would prefer if they were an admin and I'm not seeing any recent edits/clerking on es:Wikipedia:Cambiar el nombre de usuario. I'm not opposed to this passing though since Aopou seems fairly trusted. Ternera (talk) 05:57, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  Comment Comment: Ternera: Actually, my idea was to become a local renamer, but on the Spanish Wikipedia, username change requests are quite rare, and there is already someone who usually handles them—a global renamer and former administrator of that same Wikipedia. The times I wanted to respond or collaborate, I was told I needed to submit a request. So, I prefer to do it globally, especially since I have knowledge of other languages, allowing me to contribute as a global renamer. —Aopou {discusión} 06:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Aopou Why are you not an admin on that wiki? Leaderboard (talk) 06:35, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  Leaderboard: Honestly, it is one of the Wikipedias where users are judged the most when submitting a candidacy. They look for even the smallest mistake from years ago (I say this as an exaggeration, but they do search for the tiniest errors). Additionally, most users dislike candidates with few edits (fewer than 50,000 or 100,000). There are more details, but unfortunately, that’s why I was never a candidate and never submitted my application. Even though I would like to, considering we have 56 administrators and fewer than 10 are active, I prefer to keep contributing to my Wikipedia and others in different ways. —Aopou {discusión} 06:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

• (削除) Support Support - reasoning is sensible and clerking at renamer venues tends to be unhelpful. Leaderboard (talk) 07:15, 19 December 2024 (UTC) (削除ここまで)

  @Aopou:, what's going on (see your talk page)? "it has become clear to us that you or someone you know had created the account Horcus" is a pretty serious accusation, and will result in an auto-oppose without clarification. Leaderboard (talk) 05:17, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

  Apparently known to each other IRL per User talk:EPIC#Re: Horcus and User talk:Horcus#c-Horcus-20241229034100-EPIC-20241229001100, from what it seems. I haven't changed my vote so far, purely because a neutral vote doesn't affect the stats and I'd like to know more info about this before making a proper decision. --SHB2000 (t • c) 05:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

  Leaderboard, SHB2000: As I mentioned in the EPIC discussion and as Horcus noted in their statement, we are different individuals, although we use the same IP address. He is my partner, to clarify directly. I invited him to collaborate on Wikimedia projects, which is primarily reflected in the Spanish Wikipedia, where we are both main contributors.

  He was aware of my request to become a global renamer and decided to vote in my favor, just as other users did. However, neither he nor I, despite my experience as a user, were aware that this action could be interpreted as an invalid vote due to sharing the same IP address, even though it is clearly not a legitimate sockpuppet.

  I deeply regret the situation, as it caused an issue and primarily affected another user’s request, which was eventually reopened. In summary, he is someone I know personally with whom I share an IP address, and he did vote on my request. I want to emphasize that I do not need to self-vote, let alone "tarnish" my reputation in this way, especially considering that other trusted users from my community, including administrators and former administrators, had already expressed their support for me.

  It was a serious mistake for him to intervene in my request and other votes, something he completely regrets. As I stated in the EPIC discussion, if it is necessary to withdraw my request or impose a sanction on Meta, I will accept the consequences. I sincerely apologize to those who placed their trust in me. —Aopou {discusión} 06:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

  OK, reiterating Support Support as this seems to be collaborated with the steward's statement. Leaderboard (talk) 11:17, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

• Neutral Neutral --Ameisenigel (talk) 07:22, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
• Neutral Neutral for now. I'm more or less concerned by what ternera has mentioned already; otherwise I'd lean back onto edit matrix which doesn't seem too strong now, but I'm also not sure if this is because of eswiki's RfA process (as described by the candidate). --SHB2000 (t • c) 07:35, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  I'm keeping my vote as neutral for the same reasons above. This was more or less unintended and I'm willing to trust Aopou's word on it – had Aopou known (which I don't blame them for not knowing – this isn't really meatpuppetry as Aopou never explicitly told her partner about this), I'm sure she'd have told her partner, but she didn't, and she was truly sorry and apologised for that. Horcus' votes have been struck; I think that's all that needs to be done for now. --SHB2000 (t • c) 07:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

• (削除) Oppose Oppose per SHB2000 (sorry). I would support later if there are advanced permissions or better edit matrix (e.g. strong cross wiki track-record, etc.). I'm also hesitant because this request passing opens the global rename candidacy to lot more other users without advanced rights or strong edit matrix, which I am not sure is desirable. – Svārtava (t ɕ) 08:38, 19 December 2024 (UTC) (削除ここまで)

  Changing to Weak support per Leaderboard and Gadir and the clarified rationale. – Svārtava (t ɕ) 20:41, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

• Neutral Neutral per Ternera and SHB2000. Borhan (talk) 08:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
• Weak support per SHB2000 Bright 17:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
• Neutral Neutral, leaning to weak oppose, per above. ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  I am going to give it a rather Support Support. The meatpuppetry concern raised and the involvement in this and other GREN requests is rather minor and not related to the actual need of the tools. That said, given that both users acknowledged the concern, I do not see any reason for opposition. ToadetteEdit (talk) 14:04, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

• Neutral Neutral Neriah - 💬 - 20:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
• Weak oppose No advanced permissions (which are almost needed when handling renaming requests of username blocked users) and low edit matrix. Regardless of my oppose I'd like to thank you for your volunteering. --A09 |(pogovor) 11:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support The response given to Leaderboard seems sufficient for me. The changes also seem sufficient. If you are selected, feel free to ask me and others if you have any questions. Also, I think you should give yourself a chance and try become a sysop. Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 13:59, 20 December 2024 (UTC) (削除ここまで)

  Sorry, but I can't support after this issue. Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 02:43, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

  Editing again, (削除) Neutral Neutral (削除ここまで) as per the response to SHB2000. Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 07:36, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

  Support Support After explanations, let's give him/her a chance. Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 18:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

• Neutral Neutral per Ternera and SHB2000. ~~S i d~~ 15:10, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support She is a really trusted user. --Stïnger (会話) 15:59, 20 December 2024 (UTC).
• (削除) Support Support (削除ここまで) --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 16:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC) → Neutral Neutral Update: Due to possible sockpuppetry... --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 13:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support trusted user. Jet Pilot (talk) 02:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support She's a trusted user on eswiki, and I can vouch for what she has described about the RfA process over there. A somewhat complex situation that has stagnated the sysop numbers and made the community have a lot of experienced users without any advanced permissions. Whatever the result, as Gadir said above, I think you should go for the local adminship somewhere in the future, Aopou. You never know if you can pass it unless you give it a try. --Pólux (talk) 06:28, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support per Leaderboard. Jianhui67 ^{talk ★contribs} 08:23, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 13:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose - generally prefer to see either trust and experience with sysop+ permissions or extensive involvement in renaming-adjacent areas before supporting for GRN. – Ajraddatz (talk) 04:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support per Pólux. –FlyingAce ^✈hello 00:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support Horcus (talk) 08:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC) (削除ここまで)
  • (削除) Strong support Strong support After the new explanation he gave. Horcus (talk) 21:56, 28 December 2024 (UTC) (削除ここまで)

  Striking vote after steward discussion, as a likely sockpuppet or meatpuppet. EPIC (talk) 00:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

• Neutral Neutral for now, but thanks for volunteering. --TenWhile6 11:26, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per Ternera and SHB2000. AramilFeraxa (Talk) 13:08, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per above. Hasan (talk) 16:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per Ajraddatz. —MdsShakil (talk) 18:33, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• Weak support, let's give her a chance despite the objections, no? Y además, tengo su confianza. Codename Noreste (talk) 06:12, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:47, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --M/ (talk) 13:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per Ajraddatz. --Kadı Message 19:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
• Weak support per Leaderboard --Jan Myšák (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
• Weak support Trusted user, but without advanced permissions in eswiki, Meta-Wiki or other projects. Ruy (talk) 02:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 13:16, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Weak support per Leaderboard and Gadir and the clarified rationale. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 04:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per Ajraddatz -J. Ansari Talk 06:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 13:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Since I feel a bit involved here, I will refrain from closing this request and will therefore leave it to another steward. EPIC (talk) 00:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Global rename for Wüstenspringmaus

Not ending before 3 January 2025 15:55 UTC,

Hi, I'm Wüstenspringmaus, an admin on Wikidata, AFH and a member of the ArbCom of the German Wikipedia. I am active in several multilingual projects and am familiar with local policies. I would like to support on the relevant pages and on the local request page.

I have read and will abide by the Global renamers policy, Global rename policy, and other relevant (local) policies. My languages are de-n, en-3, and la-2. Thank you for considering this request and if you have any questions or comments, please let me know. Best, Wüstenspringmaus _talk 15:55, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 16:21, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support No concerns. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 16:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 16:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support of course. Borhan (talk) 17:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support No concerns --Ameisenigel (talk) 17:15, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support sure! – Svārtava (t ɕ) 17:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support —Aopou {discusión} 20:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support sure --TenWhile6 21:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support HouseBlaster (talk) 21:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support trusted, multilingual and willing to help. --SHB2000 (t • c) 22:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Ternera (talk) 02:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --Pólux (talk) 06:31, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Jianhui67 ^{talk ★contribs} 08:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 13:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --Jet Pilot (talk) 21:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support – Ajraddatz (talk) 04:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support.--HakanIST (talk) 06:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support of course. Thank you for volunteering.--A09 |(pogovor) 14:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support HotkoS (talk) 21:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support –FlyingAce ^✈hello 00:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --Ferien (talk) 00:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support Horcus (talk) 08:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC) (削除ここまで)

  Striking vote after steward discussion, as a likely sockpuppet or meatpuppet. EPIC (talk) 00:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support AramilFeraxa (Talk) 13:08, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Looks good to me, experienced, has been receptive to feedback in the past. Good luck! --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 16:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support. Hasan (talk) 16:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support. Codename Noreste (talk) 06:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support XXBlackburnXx (talk) 12:32, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support -J. Ansari Talk 12:53, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:47, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support Trusted user; Sysop of wikidata. --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 12:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --M/ (talk) 13:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --Kadı Message 19:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support no concerns --Jan Myšák (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support – Leo ^? 23:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --Alaa :)..! 19:54, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support – DARIO SEVERI (talk) 04:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 13:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support TYPEINFO (talk) 13:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions

2FA Tester for Babou Tunt

• Global user: Babou Tunt (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Horcus

• Global user: Horcus (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Dpeukert

• Global user: Dpeukert (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Choth

• Global user: Choth (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for ClimbingDeveloper

• Global user: ClimbingDeveloper (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Arabsjp

• Global user: Arabsjp (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Ikkqqstudio

• Global user: Ikkqqstudio (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for TheAstorPastor

• Global user: TheAstorPastor (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for BlankEclair

• Global user: BlankEclair (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for KpaBap

• Global user: KpaBap (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for 9reat

• Global user: 9reat (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Damariobros

• Global user: Damariobros (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Knowhan

• Global user: Knowhan (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Dervişli

• Global user: Dervişli (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Dikkülah

• Global user: Dikkülah (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Bataling

• Global user: Bataling (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Aarav200

• Global user: Aarav200 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Nanona15dobato

• Global user: Nanona15dobato (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for JClouds

• Global user: JClouds (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for Vossman

• Global user: Vossman (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

2FA Tester for JClouds

• Global user: JClouds (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Requests for global rollback permissions

Global rollback for Codename Noreste

Not ending before 1 January 2025 22:21 UTC

Hello, everyone. My first global rollback request (as 64andtim) did not go well because at the time, I had limited cross-wiki experience, along with some other concerns. But as a member of the SWMT who has been fighting cross-wiki vandalism and spam (using SWViewer with over more than 3600 actions and manual undos) for a little more than a year now, I would like to apply for this permission, as the markbotedits right and exclusions from abuse filters and the CAPTCHA would be efficient in my anti-vandalism/spam/LTA work. I also hold the rollback permission on several projects (including Meta as a local patroller, and I currently hold an advanced global permission), and I have read the global rollback policy on Meta as well as some local rollback policies on some projects, where applicable. Thank you for your consideration. Codename Noreste (talk) 22:21, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support yep, sure! --TenWhile6 22:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Ya era hora. --Jet Pilot (talk) 22:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 22:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support – Leo ^? 23:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support —Aopou {discusión} 23:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support trusted editor with plenty of xwiki experience IMO. No concerns here. Ternera (talk) 02:27, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support trusted, active, and very helpful. SHB2000 (t • c) 06:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Thanks for volunteering. —MdsShakil (talk) 07:06, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support sure! --Wüstenspringmaus _talk 07:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 07:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Sure. ShifaYT ✉Talk 08:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 09:16, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support I have seen you on SWViewer many times --Tmv (talk) 10:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 11:08, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --M/ (talk) 11:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 14:21, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support. --Paloi Sciurala (talk|contribs) 15:23, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --Pólux (talk) 15:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Svārtava (t ɕ) 16:57, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support –FlyingAce ^✈hello 17:17, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --Jan Myšák (talk) 18:11, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support Thanks for volunteering. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 18:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 18:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --Alaa :)..! 19:53, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 20:13, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support Horcus (talk) 21:56, 28 December 2024 (UTC) (削除ここまで)

  Striking vote after steward discussion, as a likely sockpuppet or meatpuppet. EPIC (talk) 00:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support Ruy (talk) 02:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support good user, I'm glad to support you! Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 02:51, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support. Hasan (talk) 13:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support DARIO SEVERI (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Syunsyunminmin 🗨️talk 06:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support Borhan (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support -J. Ansari Talk 06:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 13:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Global rollback for Gadir

Not ending before 4 January 2025 00:06 UTC

Hello everyone. I am applying for global rollback rights. I globally fight vandalism via SWViewer and I know what powers these rights give me. I have read and understood the meta-wiki and other policy pages. This right will help me a lot in the fight against vandalism. Thanks you for your time. Thanks. Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 00:06, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support sysop on azwiki (therefore trust is no issue) + decent cross-wiki edit matrix; I also checked the last few reverts and don't see any issues. Thank you for volunteering. --SHB2000 (t • c) 03:22, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support —Aopou {discusión} 05:11, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Comment Comment I just do not want to vote now, but I just want to emphasize that the user has only 30 undos on wikis where he doesn't have rollback access according to SWViewer, and also that most of his xwiki activities is user renaming; if we take out the wikis where his only edits are page moves while renaming users, we can tell that outside of azwiki, he has editied a quite low number of wikis. I will reconsider voting later today if no big objections are raised, but this is what I have to say now. ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:19, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

  It appears that he did roughly 74 actions on SWViewer, to be exact. Codename Noreste (talk) 07:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

  Codename Noreste, I don't know the exact number but + there are also actions I did from wikis.

  ToadetteEdit, no, it's not actually like that. I'm browsing between wikis, I believe I am experienced in this matter. However, this rights will increase my opportunities. Still, this is my first candidacy, no problem, if not, I'll come back after a while. Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 07:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

  I ahve reviewed the acknowledgment and would be happy to Support Support; keep it up. ToadetteEdit (talk) 13:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

  While I agree the edit matrix on a cross-wiki level is lower than ideal, you need to have either local rollback or global rollback to efficiently use SWViewer ( The account must have rollback on a project they want to use or global rollback., SWViewer); not doing actions with SWViewer on wikis where they don't have rollback is completely fine. Toadette, you should stop commenting on things you have no experience in. Sorry, but I noticed this trend quite a while ago and it hasn't stopped.--A09 |(pogovor) 09:21, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support Support Svārtava (t ɕ) 08:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support per SHB2000. Codename Noreste (talk) 08:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Neutral Neutral I would have preferred some more undos, but I do not have any specific concerns --Ameisenigel (talk) 08:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Sofia (talk) 12:25, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Looks fine. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 13:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support no concerns --TenWhile6 13:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 15:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Weak support trusted user with some xwiki experience - thanks for volunteering! Ternera (talk) 16:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support --Pólux (talk) 18:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support LGTM. Borhan (talk) 12:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support. Hasan (talk) 16:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support Support Trusted no concerns -J. Ansari Talk 06:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 13:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 13:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support – Leo ^? 14:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 18:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support LGTM and I remember you positively (on azwiki) during my cross-wiki patrols :). ShifaYT ✉Talk 11:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support per Svartava TYPEINFO (talk) 13:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
• Weak support --A09 |(pogovor) 20:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Global rollback for FlightTime

Not ending before 17 January 2025 22:55 UTC

Experienced user, wanting to help Small Wiki Monitoring Team by monitoring IRC (cvn-sw). Thank you for your consideration. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

• Support Support --quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 23:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose Very few reverts since August 2024 (looking at guc.toolforge.org – I didn't look at their contributions before August 2024) and their edit matrix at the moment is mostly global renames. --SHB (t • c) 23:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

  Codename's comment just reminded me that I should reiterate that I have no issues with trust – my reason for opposing is simply the lack of experience. --SHB (t • c) 02:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose Oppose per SHB2000. I do trust the OP, but unfortunately, I'm not seeing many reverts on many small or medium-sized wikis. Codename Noreste (talk) 01:56, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Global rollback for Bhairava7

Not ending before 15 January 2025 18:47 UTC

Hello there, I'm Bhairava7 (previously Aviram7) and I'm Anti-Vandal & spam removing fighter on Wmf project via SWviewer, I have rollback privilege on several wikis (include enwiki,simplewiki, wikidata).etc and patroller on metawiki. I understand global rollback policy and I regular monitoring Vandalism or spam on wikimedia project through SWviewer.Happy editing --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 18:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

• (削除) Support Support looks good to me! Ternera (talk) 19:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC) (削除ここまで)
  • Oppose Oppose due to the concerns raised below. I think it would be best to give it some more time so Bhairava7 can gain more experience, but I may be inclined to support in the future. Ternera (talk) 13:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
• easy Support Support. --Wüstenspringmaus _talk 19:24, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support No problem. --quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 19:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC) (削除ここまで)
  • Neutral Neutral I don't really care about the hat collecting, but the recurring misidentification of vandalism concerns me. quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 13:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support Svārtava (t ɕ) 20:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC) (削除ここまで)
  • Changing vote to Strong oppose for the given reasons: strong suspicion of hat collecting.
    • Only ~ 400 SWViewver undoes (combined from both usernames) on wikis they don't already have rollback as of now; most of their undoes by SWViewer are on English and Simple Wikipedia.
    • The user's cross-wiki activity is very recent, from 4th January this year (which is one week before this request was made) and the last cross-wiki activity before that was in September 2024 (both under their old and new usernames). This is easily corroborated by global user contributions and crossactivity tool.
    • Even though this GR request was passing in just 3 more days, the user requested rollback at Hindi Wikipedia just yesterday hi:विकिपीडिया:रोलबैकर्स_अधिकार_हेतु_निवेदन#Bhairava7, which further solidified the suspicion that they are collecting rights as badges. Their activity on Hindi Wikipedia is also very low currently excluding ~ 20 edits this month i.e in January 2025.
    • Although their last 2 rollback requests at hiwiki were successful (after number of unsuccessful rollback requests and 1 autopatrol request), hiwiki admin User:SM7 correctly noted that the user typically gets inactive after getting rights and got very active when they had to rerequest it (since the rollback right given on Hindi Wikipedia that time was temporary). It is also said that they are very eager to get the rights.
    • Lastly, although this has improved, they also seem to have poor communication or language skills and sometimes what they write is borderline confusing and full of grammatical or spelling errors. This is also the case with their comments in Hindi Wikipedia (despite Hindi likely being one of their native or near-native language). Communication skills are important especially if the right is GR which can require the user to communicate on projects and languages outside which they commonly work.

  Thus, although their work on enwiki (where they are most active) appears OK, I unfortunately do not think I trust them to consistently be able to assess edits in projects and languages they are not familiar with, especially with so low cross-wiki activity (as shown above) and other concerns. I'm willing to switch to support after sufficient experience and trust is gained. Svārtava (t ɕ) 05:31, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  Oh damn, didn't realise this when giving the advice to the candidate on my talk page. Sorry, but I too have to Oppose Oppose per Svartava; the concerns about the candidate on hiwiki is very concerning (and there's no reason to doubt Svartava's concerns about the candidate's communication on hiwiki). --SHB (t • c) 06:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  See also Special:GoToComment/c-Bhairava7-20250108072600-SHB2000-20250108071600 as well. Codename Noreste (talk) 07:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  Given the user has "retired", this solidifies my oppose vote. --SHB (t • c) 11:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

see also Not retired; No, I never retired on Wikipedia but I thought Someone thought I'm going retired but this is not true, I'll be working other wiki.Happy editing --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 11:52, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

What was the retired stunt all about then? --SHB (t • c) 12:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Cc to Bhairava7 to your reply. Codename Noreste (talk) 12:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@SHB2000: No! I see the result of my request is be going unsuccessful and I already understand the global permission is very sensitive,I don't feel bad because I known all things is for temporary include life and whole the world, I like to be work on meta and other wikis. I happy with our local rights and I'm on going removing vandalism with local rollback tool and thank you for all guys for participate in my request. Happy editing --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 12:23, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@SHB2000: Hi there, I did not want to speak but today I have to say that I consider Svartava my mentor, I am trying to follow his footsteps. I really did not know that if a request for special global rights is made on a global wiki, then it should not be made on other local wikis. Anyway, Svartava also did the same thing, please see this and this too. He too had requested for rollback on Hindi Wikipedia one time before your global rollback request, after all I am also a human being. I accept that I have made a mistake but unintentionally, I should be given a chance to prove my credibility. My aim is only to remove vandalism on a global level and there is not much vandalism and rollbackers on Hindi Wikipedia, and those who are there are not active. Please consider this global request of mine.Happy editing --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 06:46, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Maybe it's just me, but I'd be concerned if your own mentor opposes your request as opposed to any other user. --SHB (t • c) 07:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Bhairava7: It is sad I had to change my vote. I wanted to support (as I did earlier) per assuming good faith although as SHB said on his talk page (and I pointed out above) that the cross-wiki activity is not very extensive. But I can't support after your hiwiki request for rollback.

It is not a rule that you can't request for rollback anywhere if you are requesting for GR, BUT, your activity on hiwiki currently is very low. If you were sufficiently active there, there is no real concern with the request even if it becomes redundant to GR.

About my request, I had requested rollback on hiwiki before GR (you can check I was active that time on hiwiki), and as far as I remember during my cross-wiki work I was suggested that I probably had enough experience for GR, so I went ahead and applied for it globally. Here, your global request for rollback was passing with full support but despite that you went to request rollback on hiwiki when you were not even active there. Svārtava (t ɕ) 07:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Svartava: Thanks for you're response, I always wanted to contribute to Hindi Wikipedia, but I had to leave Hindi Wikipedia due to some personal reasons. I had created many articles on Hindi Wikipedia and had also removed vandalism for a long time, but I wanted to contribute to other wikis like English and Metawiki and wanted to gain some new experiences.. One cannot work on more than one wiki at a time, although Hindi is my mother tongue and I know Hindi very well.. and I am a spokesperson of Hindi language, I have full capability to talk to you in clear Hindi and as far as support is concerned, I did not ask you to support me and If you think that I had requested only to gain power, then you should never have supported me. I consider you my mentor... today I have lost faith in goodness and good contributions.. Why did you request for global rollback? My only reason for requesting global rollback is that I want to keep Wikipedia and other wikis vandal-free... It would have been wrong if I started demanding rights in every wiki and I was not trying to break the policies and integrity of Wikipedia... So, I requested for global rollback and if you find my intention wrong... then I will never consider contributing to Wikipedia again and will give up all rights.Happy editing --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 07:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Svartava does have an extensive history of cross-wiki patrolling – that alone is enough for global rollback. They were very well aware of the implications of GR and why it's considered such a sensitive permission.

The same can't be said for you when it's abundantly clear that local rollback on hiwiki is redundant to global rollback (and for extra measure, if you see my x-wiki edit matrix, all the wikis which I'm either autopatrolled or have rollback on were because I obtained such perms before getting GR) – and giving GR, which gives unrestricted rollback + autopatrolled access at 850+ wikis, into the hands of someone who might just not fully understand what it gives can have unintended consequences down the road. --SHB (t • c) 08:09, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Svartava: Hello, I have already been given the right to rollback temporarily three times on Hindi Wikipedia, I am not collecting any top-level fame, rather I am interested in removing vandalism globally, I have the right to rollback on other wikis as well, I have not done anything wrong... and if you think that I have not done any wrong editing anywhere on Wikipedia.Happy editing!--- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 05:55, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Support Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support no concerns. (削除ここまで) Borhan (talk) 21:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
  • changing my vote to Neutral Neutral per Svartava and MdsShakil's comment. Borhan (talk) 11:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support. (削除ここまで) (changed to Neutral neutral per Svartava's strong objection regarding the OP's concerns on the Hindi Wikipedia.) Codename Noreste (talk) 00:12, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Sure. Aqurs1 (talk) 05:06, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support as Per Ternera TYPEINFO (talk) 08:16, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 09:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 10:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 14:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support ---Hasan (talk) 14:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support. --Paloi Sciurala (talk|contribs) 15:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 16:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Jianhui67 ^{talk ★contribs} 16:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Drummingman (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support LGTM. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 19:32, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support —Aopou {discusión} 19:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 04:56, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
• Neutral Neutral I was considering supporting this request, but after Svartava's comment I'll stay neutral. I've seen some good undos from them, but a few days ago, I had to revert one of their undos on bnwiki. I'm not sure if they understand Bangla, but the edit they reverted was valid, and the user had explained it clearly in the edit summary. Also, this is Bhairava7's second request for GR. —MdsShakil (talk) 08:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
• Neutral Neutral as per Shakil. _signed, Aafi ^(talk) 09:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose It makes no sense to be active in the project till you receive the tools and go inactive once it's granted till your next request. I somewhat understand local admin's frustration over such cases. It takes a decent bit of consideration and time to review the undos and check if the user meets all the criteria before granting the bits. Tools should just be helping you contribute better.--BRP ^ever 11:47, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose Cross-wiki experience is not sufficient. Also this revert was not correct. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 12:55, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Global rollback for Quebecguy

Not ending before 15 January 2025 13:16 UTC

Hello!

Around 2 years ago, i've requested this right, but i ended up withdrawing due to my lack of experience at that time and i'm going to try again. Since my last attempt, I currently have:

• 10,000 global edits, with ~1400 reverts outside of frwiki and enwiki
• Local rollback rights on enwiki and frwiki
• Autopatrolled on Meta-Wiki
• 3 years of experience

Global rollback rights would allow me to fight against vandals and LTAs more efficiently. 2FA is also enabled on my account and i intend to fully adhere by the GR policy. Thanks! --quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 13:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

• Weak support checked some recent undos and they look good to me. activity over the past year looks a little low, but I don't think that will be a huge issue. thanks for volunteering! Ternera (talk) 14:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support. --Wüstenspringmaus _talk 16:24, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 18:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 18:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Weak support recent cross-activity seems low to me, but i see a lot of good reverts done by him. Borhan (talk) 21:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• (削除) Weak support (削除ここまで) per Borhan. --SHB (t • c) 22:26, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Changing to Neutral Neutral per the link that XXB mentioned. --SHB (t • c) 10:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

• Despite the somewhat low cross-wiki activity, I don't see any recent concerns, so I am inclined to Support Support. Codename Noreste (talk) 00:12, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Cross wiki activity is a bit low, besides that there's no problem, Weak support. Aqurs1 (talk) 05:12, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support though with a Note: please don't edit war with vandals in the future. Doing so is counterproductive and only encourages them. Report and wait for an admin to intervene. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 05:42, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

  Comment Comment Hello, XXBlackburnXx, well, those are the usual results of not protecting clearly high-traffic pages, on a regular or permanent basis... نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 09:17, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

  This has nothing to do with 'high traffic' pages not being protected well enough or permanently but serves as general advice. + that page functions as a hub for collaboration, where new users should have the opportunity to engage. Protecting it long-term is counterproductive XXBlackburnXx (talk) 09:23, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

  Protecting it is also rather counterproductive as it can in some cases just encourage vandals to move onto another page. Sometimes (and in the case of the link XXB mentioned) it's better to just leave it be for a few hours and report to WM:RFH – leaving vandalism up for an hour and waiting for an admin isn't the end of the world. SHB (t • c) 11:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

  @XXBlackburnXx: Will do in the future. quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 12:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

  w:WP:IBRL is also a good advice. Sometimes vandals do stop after short time e.g. 20-30 minutes and do not persist; after which it is easy to mass-rollback their edits ourselves. Svārtava (t ɕ) 21:34, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

• Support Support --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 09:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 14:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support - Hasan (talk) 14:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support. --Paloi Sciurala (talk|contribs) 15:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support The xwiki activity is a bit on the lower side but they're doing a good job with it overall and have some experience. Mistakes like the edit war presented happen and one can learn what may be a better way to handle them. Good luck! --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support but like the others above, I would suggest that you take things slow and don't rush. Jianhui67 ^{talk ★contribs} 16:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 19:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support —Aopou {discusión} 19:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 04:56, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --Pólux (talk) 14:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 05:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support as per Tanbiruzzaman TYPEINFO (talk) 14:09, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support –FlyingAce ^✈hello 15:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support ToadetteEdit (2025 is here ) 18:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Thanks for volunteering. —MdsShakil (talk) 18:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Global rollback for MarkRosenbaum

Not ending before 25 January 2025 16:57 UTC

Hi All, I'm hoping to gain the Global Rollback permission. While I could be considered newer as accounts go I have a strong interest in Wikipedia Anti-Vandalism and I believe I have proven that on enwiki. I'd like to get involved in cross-wiki anti-vandalism and small wiki monitoring so I'm requesting global rollback. Thank you for your consideration, Mark — The preceding unsigned comment was added by MarkRosenbaum (talk) 16:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

@MarkRosenbaum: Unfortunately, this request is clearly too soon as you have very little cross-wiki activity; if you are interested in doing cross-wiki patrolling, SWViewer is a helpful tool to start. You may rerequest later when you have gained sufficient experience using it, but I suggest withdrawing this for now. Thanks for volunteering. Svārtava (t ɕ) 17:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

In addition to SWViewer, I recommend TwinkleGlobal. It's clearly too soon for global rollback. Quoting global rollback: „For consideration, users must be demonstrably active in cross-wiki counter-vandalism or anti-spam activities (...) and make heavy use of revert on many wikis", that's currently not the case. Johannnes89 (talk) 18:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Got it, thanks for the feedback. I'll go get some more experience and come back at a later date. MarkRosenbaum (talk) 18:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

this request is Request withdrawn then. --TenWhile6 18:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose Oppose due to a lack of cross-wiki anti-vandalism/spam activity. Codename Noreste (talk) 17:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per above vote; nonexistent cross wiki experience. Go start reverting vandalism on multiple wikis, and feel free to reapply in a few months. ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose considerably more experience required for this advanced access across the entire network. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose rollback-permissions only on one project, less than 1000 global edits, nearly no xwiki activity. --TenWhile6 18:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose I think a global rollbacker candidate should have at least 1000 or 5000 global edits, and several hundred of them should be visible when scrolling their CA. Jet Pilot (talk) 18:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per above comments. Wüstenspringmaus _talk 18:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Global rollback for TypeInfo

Not ending before 30 January 2025 21:44 UTC

I am requesting global rollback rights to help combat cross-wiki vandalism and disruptive edits effectively. Over the years, I have gained extensive experience in identifying and reverting vandalism on multiple Wikimedia projects, including English Wikipedia, Hindi Wikipedia, Wikidata, and Commons.I regularly monitor recent changes and revert inappropriate edits using rollback tools where I already have local rights. However, there are situations where I encounter vandalism across wikis where I lack these permissions, making it challenging to act swiftly. Global rollback rights would enable me to handle such cases more efficiently and contribute to maintaining the integrity of Wikimedia projects globally. TYPEINFO (talk) 21:44, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose Oppose Sorry but no, poor cross-wiki experience, only perform actions on projects which you got rollback rights. All of them are granted for about a month, and the reason for request is because they are rollbacker in other projects. I won't say it's cross-wiki hat collecter but definitely too early for gr. Thanks for your passion tho. aqurs ❄️ 23:38, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for your honest feedback and for taking the time to review my request. I understand that my cross-wiki experience may currently be limited, and I acknowledge the need to build a stronger track record across multiple projects before pursuing global rollback rights.I will focus on increasing my contributions to smaller wikis and actively engaging in cross-wiki anti-vandalism work to demonstrate my commitment and reliability. My intention is not to collect hats but to genuinely assist in maintaining the integrity of Wikimedia projects.Your guidance is valuable, and I will work on improving my experience and reapply at an appropriate time when I can better demonstrate my readiness for this responsibility. TYPEINFO (talk) 04:30, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose Oppose —Aopou {talk} 02:59, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
• Strong oppose and this comes less than a month since their request for patroller was declined on Meta-Wiki. The same issues of limited reverts (esp outside the projects they hold rollback on). I do not trust TypeInfo one bit to have unsupervised autopatroller access that comes with GR, use TwinkleGlobal or Restorer to gain experience first. --SHB (t • c) 04:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
• Request withdrawn Thank you for your detailed feedback and for taking the time to review my request. I understand the concerns raised about my current level of cross-wiki experience and the need to build a stronger foundation before pursuing global rollback rights.I acknowledge that my recent activity and limited reverts, especially outside projects where I hold rollback, are insufficient to justify this request at this time. Additionally, I take your suggestion to use tools like TwinkleGlobal or Restorer seriously and will focus on gaining the necessary experience and trust.In light of this, I am withdrawing my request for global rollback. I will continue to improve my cross-wiki contributions and revisit this request when I am better prepared. Thank you again for your guidance and honest feedback. TYPEINFO (talk) 04:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Requests for other global permissions

Global interface editor for Danielyepezgarces

Hello, my motivation for obtaining this permission is to be a pioneer in leading the necessary changes so that my local wiki (eswiki) was shareable with dark mode and many of the editors could enjoy this mode, and my purpose for this permission is to help chapter wikis to have corrections and help in the interface, --Danielyepezgarces (talk) 03:15, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose Oppose You're already an interface admin on eswiki, which should suffice for that wiki. From watching others most dark mode changes don't need interface admin access. If specific chapters wikis trust you with this then that's their right, but I don't think this extremely powerful global group is warranted. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 03:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

I understand your point of view, and thank you for your opinion, it is very valuable, but I want to emphasize that requests like these phab:T383378 cannot be attended to as a normal user. Danielyepezgarces (talk) 03:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

And my point is they should be attended to by the governance structure of the chapter (who already has the relevant rights), not an outsider. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 05:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose Oppose per Pppery. --SHB (t • c) 04:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose Bureaucrats in a chapter wiki could grant you the required rights to do these changes (if they want). --Ameisenigel (talk) 09:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per above --Wüstenspringmaus _talk 09:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose In general chapter wiki's aren't part of SUL, making this useless there. — xaosflux ^Talk 10:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per above. Neriah - 💬 - 11:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per Pppery. Ternera (talk) 14:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose per above. Borhan (talk) 21:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose Oppose. Unfortunately, I believe your valid use case could probably do more harm than good, as the permission you are requesting is a truly global permission that could potentially be dangerous when used with malicious intent, and I agree with Pppery here that your interface administrator permission on the Spanish Wikipedia should be sufficient. Codename Noreste (talk) 00:17, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

remove global VRT permissions agents for .avgas

• Global user: .avgas (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

add global VRT permissions agents for Nemoralis

• Global user: Nemoralis (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )

Requests for global sysop permissions

Global sysop for Ternera

Not ending before 15 January 2025 18:49 UTC

Hello all,

I’m Ternera and I’ve been actively fighting vandalism on a variety of wikis - especially focusing on small wikis with no admins.

I'm requesting global sysop rights mainly so I can help with Global sysops/Speedy delete requests and at GSR, where I've made over 350 edits. It would also come in helpful while I’m patrolling recent changes and run into LTA’s on small wikis.

Currently, I’m a global rollbacker and have served as a sysop on rwwiki for the past 6 months, which has taught me how to use the sysop toolkit. I’ve made my fair share of mistakes since I've been participating on Wiki projects, but I do my best to learn from them. 2fa is enabled on my account. Thank you for your feedback. Ternera (talk) 18:49, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

• One of the easiest Support Supports of my life, trusted user with sysop and global experience.-FusionSub (talk) 18:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support No concerns --Wüstenspringmaus _talk 18:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support experienced and active. Svārtava (t ɕ) 18:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support ToadetteEdit (2025 is here ) 19:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support —Aopou {discusión} 19:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Active and trusted. --M/ (talk) 19:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support no concerns here. trusted, active and experienced. thanks for volunteering, good luck. Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 19:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Easy Support Support –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 19:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support, seems fine (sysop on two content projects with the global GR permission). Codename Noreste (talk) 19:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Experienced and trusted enough, no concerns --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 19:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support – Leo ^talk 20:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support no concerns. --TenWhile6 21:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --Alaa :)..! 21:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Thank you for volunteering, I'm your friendly and helpful hotline for assisting global sysops on sr.wiki! :-) Local administrator of the Serbian Wikipedia, --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 21:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

  + Comment Comment Moved to: Talk:Global sysops#A proposal for assisting global users on various local wikis, so please visit that page there. --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Support Support also rwwiki + rwwikt sysop; can be trusted with no issues. --SHB (t • c) 22:37, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 00:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support trusted user --Mtarch11 (talk) 00:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --Pólux (talk) 04:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support --Jet Pilot (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support trusted and experienced user. Borhan (talk) 10:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --- Hasan (talk) 16:17, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 10:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support TYPEINFO (talk) 13:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support--A09 |(pogovor) 20:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support--WikiBayer 👤💬 (WikiBayerCatHelper) 21:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support Sofia (talk) 05:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support. --Paloi Sciurala (talk|contribs) 15:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support –FlyingAce ^✈hello 00:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support —MdsShakil (talk) 04:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Jianhui67 ^{talk ★contribs} 15:12, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support trustedAqurs1 (talk) 02:57, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:22, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 21:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support – DARIO SEVERI (talk) 12:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Tmv (talk) 09:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 13:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support no concerns and thanks for volunteering.~~S i d~~ 14:31, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support XXBlackburnXx (talk) 16:44, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Neriah - 💬 - 11:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Trusted -J. Ansari Talk 11:24, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support No Concerns. --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 14:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support no concerns; obviously competent.--BRP ^ever 14:20, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
• (削除) Support Support --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 04:57, 12 January 2025 (UTC) (削除ここまで) Duplicate votes on above. --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 06:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support --LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 05:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
• Strong support Strong support --Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 07:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
• Support Support Wasn't planning on voting, but then I saw Special:Permalink/28102157. Yep, competent with a clear need. JJP _{Mas ter} (she/they) 17:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)