Meta:Requests for interface adminship/PediAki
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
- PediAki (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.
Not ending before 26 August 2021 03:53 (UTC)
im a volunteer in wikipedia since 2017, and i have many translations in meta-wikimedia, i am an web developer and i can edit the interface of meta wikimedia with HTML CSS JS... . --PediAki (talk) 03:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- Question Question: Interface administrators are users who edit Meta-Wiki's interface and user's technical interface pages here. In addition, with some technical features of Meta-Wiki, they can make some arrangements that related with all Wikimedia wikis. Generally you have done translations on Meta-Wiki and Commons. You have been blocked indefinitely for not contribute to build the encyclopedia on the English Wikipedia on your home wiki. This is a concern for trusted rights on Meta-Wiki if there are users' some indefinite blocking with serious reasons on home wikis. Do you have any edits that you know use about this right or any such right that you have previously accessed on any Wikimedia wikis that will address these concerns? --Uncitoyen talk 12:21, 19 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose Oppose I'm against because I think that this right should be given to a reliable user. --Uncitoyen talk 10:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- No. I don't see that this is needed. Also, your block at enWP is not a good indicator either of why we would want to let you into the secure areas of the wiki. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Billinghurst (talk) 13:27, 19 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- I don't see why this userright is needed; usually with IA a specific project or intention is needed rather than just a blanket editing the interface. And even if there was adequate need for the userright, you should sort out local blocks before requesting a right that has global effects. Vermont (talk) 15:28, 19 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose Oppose per Billinghurst and Vermont. --Ameisenigel (talk) 10:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- Strong oppose - with active blocks on a content project, no community admin or IA support on any WMF project, and no special use case put forward for why this is needed on the meta-wiki I certainly oppose this. IA on m-w requires a high level of trust as it can have far-reaching security implications. — xaosflux Talk 14:28, 20 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- Just a passing thought, should we at least grant them autopatrol here, 7000 edits on meta seems enough for this right, but I can't understand the language of their translations. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 08:07, 21 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- Don't see what that has to do with this severely premature iadmin request, they certainly could have gone to ask for that if they wanted it. — xaosflux Talk 13:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yeah, that's just a passing thought. Seemed irrelevant here indeed, apologies. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:23, 21 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- Don't see what that has to do with this severely premature iadmin request, they certainly could have gone to ask for that if they wanted it. — xaosflux Talk 13:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- Strong oppose considering Meta is a wiki with global impact, (interface) admins are more powerful here than on other wikis. I cannot support anyone who has an active block in a content wiki. Even if there was no such block, there's no reasoning about why the requestor needs the right. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- Strong oppose I agree with Martin Urbanec in every way except for the blocked one, as some people get blocked for username issues simply like repeating characters. OP also hasn't given a valid reason, and looks like hat collecting to me. SHB2000 (talk | contibs) 12:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose Oppose per above --DannyS712 (talk) 01:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
No consensus to promote. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC) [reply ]
- The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.