5
\$\begingroup\$

The ++ operator in Systemverilog is blocking. Is there a nonblocking equivalent to it, or are we bound to use the more verbose x<=x+1 form if we want to keep it nonblocking?

Refer to IEEE Std 1800-2017, section 11.4.2 Increment and decrement operators:

These increment and decrement assignment operators behave as blocking assignments.

toolic
10.8k11 gold badges31 silver badges35 bronze badges
asked Feb 14, 2021 at 19:28
\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

9
\$\begingroup\$

There is no non-blocking equivalent to the ++ operator. It has been suggested for the next revision of the standard.

answered Feb 14, 2021 at 20:45
\$\endgroup\$
1

Your Answer

Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google
Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.