• [^] # Re: OMG

    Posté par . En réponse au journal LINUX 2.8.0. Évalué à 6.

    J'ai un peu l'impression que c'est fait expres pour le 42...

    So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0", not "3.0.0" - the stable team would get the third digit rather than the fourth one.

    But no, it wouldn't be for 42. Despite THHGTTG, I think "40" is a fairly nice round number.

    There's also the timing issue - since we no longer do version numbers based on features, but based on time, just saying "we're about to start the third decade" works as well as any other excuse.

    But we'll see.

    Linus