"The new CFQ scheduler has spawned a low-key debate over which scheduler should be used by default. The default scheduler currently is AS, but some people (Andrea Arcangeli in particular) are saying that it should be CFQ instead. SUSE apparently already makes CFQ the default scheduler for its enterprise kernel. Andrew Morton is unsure; AS still seems to be better for desktop systems and IDE disks. Even so, he is ready to consider a change in the default scheduler."
Donc y'a pas mal de gens qui utilisent CFQ (tous les gens qui ont une Suse entreprise) et de plus cela pourrait bien devenir le scheduler par défaut.
[^] # Re: Testé et approuvé
Posté par patrick_g (site web personnel) . En réponse à la dépêche Sortie du noyau Linux 2.6.13. Évalué à 8.
Vu sur http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/(...)
"The new CFQ scheduler has spawned a low-key debate over which scheduler should be used by default. The default scheduler currently is AS, but some people (Andrea Arcangeli in particular) are saying that it should be CFQ instead. SUSE apparently already makes CFQ the default scheduler for its enterprise kernel. Andrew Morton is unsure; AS still seems to be better for desktop systems and IDE disks. Even so, he is ready to consider a change in the default scheduler."
Donc y'a pas mal de gens qui utilisent CFQ (tous les gens qui ont une Suse entreprise) et de plus cela pourrait bien devenir le scheduler par défaut.