Et les travaux ont commencé avant : Some patches and recent discussion on this list have been in favor of
having nautilus use an "Object Oriented methaphor". I feel that we
can't really discuss the patches as such without considering the full
future direction of the Nautilus user experience.
Il y avait déjà des patches et des discussions.
La fin du mail : I'm really not sure what is the right path here. But I don't think
that we should apply any patches concerning this until we have decided
fully where we want to go. I also think that if we decide to keep the
navigation model we should not be changing the defaults to be oo-like. I
think that would be doing our users a disservice.
Il y a eu consertation puisque ça a changé. Ce chois n'a pas été fait au hazard ou par une "tête de mule". Le "mépriser" sur le fait que NT était spatial (ce qui est faut) et que MS est revenu en arrière est ...
[^] # Re: GNOME 2.6 beta 1
Posté par mat1 . En réponse à la dépêche GNOME 2.6 beta 1. Évalué à 1.
Some patches and recent discussion on this list have been in favor of
having nautilus use an "Object Oriented methaphor". I feel that we
can't really discuss the patches as such without considering the full
future direction of the Nautilus user experience.
Il y avait déjà des patches et des discussions.
La fin du mail :
I'm really not sure what is the right path here. But I don't think
that we should apply any patches concerning this until we have decided
fully where we want to go. I also think that if we decide to keep the
navigation model we should not be changing the defaults to be oo-like. I
think that would be doing our users a disservice.
Il y a eu consertation puisque ça a changé. Ce chois n'a pas été fait au hazard ou par une "tête de mule". Le "mépriser" sur le fait que NT était spatial (ce qui est faut) et que MS est revenu en arrière est ...