There are other examples, e.g. Fedora Flatpaks not being kept up to date (I don’t know if this specific issue is still recurring on new releases). In this issue I offered to help with the Flatpaks and was referred to the package maintainers documentation - but this is entirely about RPMs (not Flatpaks), and honestly I just started questioning the value of the Fedora Flatpaks in the first place (I’m now just using Flathub directly).
[...] In my view, this is because Silverblue (and, possibly separately, Flatpaks) doesn’t really have a working group - or, at least, not one I could track down - and so it’s very hard to contribute
R
There is now a SIG for Flatpaks in Fedora 1 with regular meetings.
Silverblue discussions most likely happen in the Workstation working group (not sure as I don’t attend those).
Il y a donc les flatpak fedora et ceux de flathub ? Pourquoi ? Et y a t-il des doublons ? Est-ce que l'idée de flatpak fedora ne tue pas l'idée même de flatpak ?
[^] # Re: Vivement l'avènement de Silverblue
Posté par antistress (site web personnel) . En réponse à la dépêche Fedora Linux 38 devient accessible !. Évalué à 3. Dernière modification le 20 avril 2023 à 13:55.
Intéressant en suivant ton lien :
Q
R
Il y a donc les flatpak fedora et ceux de flathub ? Pourquoi ? Et y a t-il des doublons ? Est-ce que l'idée de flatpak fedora ne tue pas l'idée même de flatpak ?