"Although we have asked them to stop doing so, the W3C also republishes some parts of this specification as separate documents."
"For a number of years, both groups then worked together. In 2011, however, the groups came to the conclusion that they had different goals: the W3C wanted to publish a "finished" version of "HTML5", while the WHATWG wanted to continue working on a Living Standard for HTML, continuously maintaining the specification rather than freezing it in a state with known problems, and adding new features as needed to evolve the platform."
"Since then, the WHATWG has been working on this specification (amongst others), and the W3C has been copying fixes made by the WHATWG into their fork of the document (which also has other changes)."
A contrario côté W3C, on se réjouit et on se flatte de la bonne coopération entre les deux structures.
[^] # Re: Il ne faut pas y faire trop attention
Posté par Benoît Sibaud (site web personnel) . En réponse au journal Hache-thé-aime-aile cinq virgule deux (a.k.a HTML 5.2 pour les intimes). Évalué à 10. Dernière modification le 22 décembre 2017 à 08:44.
Le WHATWG le dit explicitement:
"Although we have asked them to stop doing so, the W3C also republishes some parts of this specification as separate documents."
"For a number of years, both groups then worked together. In 2011, however, the groups came to the conclusion that they had different goals: the W3C wanted to publish a "finished" version of "HTML5", while the WHATWG wanted to continue working on a Living Standard for HTML, continuously maintaining the specification rather than freezing it in a state with known problems, and adding new features as needed to evolve the platform."
"Since then, the WHATWG has been working on this specification (amongst others), and the W3C has been copying fixes made by the WHATWG into their fork of the document (which also has other changes)."
A contrario côté W3C, on se réjouit et on se flatte de la bonne coopération entre les deux structures.