• [^] # Re: Du bon et du mauvais

    Posté par . En réponse au journal SD-Boot, l'EFI Boot Manager & Stub Loader de systemd, arrive. Évalué à -4.

    La ponctuation, c'est important.

    J'ai dit, grâce à la magie de la VIRGULE, qu'il y avait des proof of concept ET des trucs bancals (Upstart).

    J'ai jamais dit que Upstart n'était pas en prod, ni qu'il était un proof of concept.

    Quant à initng ou runit, ils sont très loin de couvrir tous les cas d'utilisation que systemd couvre car qui les utilisent ? à peu près personne.

    Quasiment toutes les distribs sont passés à systemd, mais tout le monde se trompe : initng et runit sont vachement mieux !1one

    Tiens ça me rappelle un post :

    I have spent too much time arguing against the perceived deficiencies of systemd (such as: "it is not written in bash", "it was started by Lennart Poettering", "I don't like the (optional) on-disk format of the journal", "it uses dbus", "systemd's PID1 does more and is bigger than sysvinit's PID1", "I think there might be this other project that possibly is doing something similar. I don't really know anything about it, but I'm pretty sure it is better than systemd" and I'm sure there are many more). I strongly believe that 1) all of these perceived deficiencies are not deficiencies, but are actually benefits 2) even if I'm wrong, these things are not hugely important. So, with that out of the way: let's ignore all of those old boring arguments and I'll outline a few things that I find awesome about systemd, and why I think we should all be very excited about soon being able to use it. In no particular order:

    "Quand certains râlent contre systemd, d'autres s'attaquent aux vrais problèmes." (merci Sinma !)