Stewards/confirm/2009/Thogo

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

• Awesome and dedicated. miranda 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Yes, good for me. Majorly ^talk 00:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Oppose Oppose due to blatant abuse of their rights, which I consider entirely inappropriate. — Aitias // discussion 00:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

  Where is the "blatant abuse"? I only looked at the log, which is possible globally for all stewards anyway now. This is not a COI of any kind. --Thogo (talk) 00:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

  It's a blatant abuse per Steward_policy#Avoid_conflicts_of_interest. Changing your own rights on your home wiki is an apparent conflict of interest. — Aitias // discussion 01:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

  Maybe de-arbcom asked for Thogo to check something? That's just like Lar or anyone else CUing people on Commons or En-wiki when CUs are not available. miranda 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

  Exactly. Having access to a log where no local users with that user right exist cannot be a COI. And dewiki doesn't have oversighters. If I had oversighted something it would be an issue, but I didn't, as any other steward can confirm. --Thogo (talk) 01:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

  I can confirm that 1. Thogo did never do any oversight action on de.wiki and that 2. all stewards have now log access to cu and os log on all wikis. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} 01:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

• Active in the SWMT-area, doing a great job as a steward, also helped a lot solving account-problems and in bug-finding when SULwas introduced, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið _{(:> )=|} 00:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Thogo is doing fine. --Kanonkas 01:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• excellent steward. --APPER 01:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Nobody is free of mistakes - but Thogo as Rights-Abuser? That makes me lough. Marcus Cyron 01:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Very active steward. Does a lot of good work. As every human makes mistakes, also a steward can. Please keep up the good work! Romaine 02:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• He has been doing a really good job and that right change on dewiki his homewiki is fine because it related to the removal or private information which I'm told he never did as it was not necessary and the fact that the german wikipedia does not have local oversighters is something the local dewikipedians should discuss about appointing :) ..--Comet styles 03:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Thogo = good. Prodego ^talk 03:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Thogo == gooth (technically) which is close enough to "good" for full marks. Seriously, that rights thing is overblown. Thogo is someone I'm always glad to see on IRC, I was consulting him about something just today, and his counsel is always wise. Stewards collaborate... I can think of few stewards I'd rather collaborate with than Thogo. Hard worker. Obvious keep. ++Lar: t/c 04:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• COI - I'm also up for confirmation. Thogo was very kind and helpful when I was trying to fix my global steward account. Seems to be on IRC often doing similar things for others. I say keep. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 05:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Confirm. Good work. MBisanz ^talk 06:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Confirm, excellent steward --Church of emacs 10:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• good work --Berliner Schildkröte 11:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Excellent, active, helpful. What more? :)--Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 13:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep. Trustworthy — vvv 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Always available and helpful, keep. Cbrown1023 talk 15:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep, he is active and helpful. —Dferg ^(meta-w:es:) 16:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep, he is a good steward. -- Mercy (☎|✍ ) 16:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Full support - does excellent work on a consistent basis. — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 17:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep 'im. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep per everyone else. Razorflame 21:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• OK--Kwj2772 03:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Well, what should I add? We know us pretty well and I can't see a reason not to trust him. A very active, hard-working and nice friend. Keep, of course. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support --Jón 17:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Useful CU work for us on it.quote. --Nemo 18:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep, no reason to worry about his actions. →Na · gy 19:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Coimeád - another one of those stewards I've had to rely upon heavily over the last year. One of the good guys :) - Alison ^❤ 19:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep Thogo, very considerate user and steward. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support --oscar 22:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Very useful fellow. DarkoNeko 00:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support.--Jusjih 03:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support ---Zyephyrus 22:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support - Peripitus 10:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep, very active steward. _~ Innv ^s: 12:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Dedicated and good! fr33k man ^{t - c} 04:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support - Woudloper 11:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support --Tilla 12:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 13:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support--Sadik Khalid 16:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support good admin german wikipedia. --Linveggie 22:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep We need at least one steward with a good beard. –Ejs-80 22:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support, good job. Alex Pereira ^falaê 16:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Kylu 21:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• well done up to now - move on the same way ;) --Rax 23:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Strong Oppose Oppose Ce type, médiocre, est animé par la seule haine. --Budelberger 20:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC) ( ). (Avis donné bien qu'il soit complètement inutile ; cet individu étant un membre éminent – et éminemment représentatif – de la Famille ; maintenant, j'attends les mesures de rétorsion, de ses petits camarades, qu'il serait trop long de citer.)[reply ]
  Translation: "Strong oppose: This guy, a mediocre, is driven solely by hatred. (Opinion given even though it's completely useless; this individual being an eminent member – and eminently representative – of the Family; now, I await the measures of retaliation, from his little comrades, which would be too long to cite.)" —translated by Pathoschild.

  Taking a good look at that user's talk page [1] will plenty of good reason to just ignore his comments. DarkoNeko 07:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

• Support Support Absolutely supportive and hard worker. --RudolfSimon 22:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Real hard worker. I'm grad to see him willing to continue. --Aphaia 05:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep Keep Very active steward. --Millosh 13:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• definitely keep --FiliP ×ばつ 17:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support active and exactly working steward. Thank you! --buecherwuermlein 19:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
• Support Support Obvious keep! --M.L 23:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC) [reply ]

• Steward confirmations 2009