Jump to content
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2025/Votes/Leaderboard

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: see below
  • Personal info: (English)
    I'm Leaderboard, and I want to be a steward for 2025. My primary areas of interest would be
    • granting permissions on SRP and SRGP - I've been around as a participant on the latter for a while, and would like to grant them myself
    • using my technical skills to make things easier and better for other stewards and contributors, and more broadly being on the "backend" of the team including handling off-wiki requests:
      • I am the author of Global reminder bot, which runs on nearly 800 wikis and reminds users whose temporary rights are due to expire (especially useful on smaller wikis which tend to be the ones with few/no permanent administrators), supporting MVR in the process. As a steward, I'd like to help resolve issues such as Stewards'_noticeboard/Archives/2024-09#phab:T25310 (to the extent I'm allowed to), and perhaps improve related things such as AAR.
      • I'm also an abuse filter helper, which grants me the ability to view (private) filters on the Wikimedia network, and have assisted multiple wikis with their filters over the years.
      • As an admin+interfaceadmin on en.wikibooks, I've also helped implement many of the technical requests submitted by users, and have performed relatively advanced tasks such as importupload and history-merging.
      • I'm an admin on en.wikinews (and the Wikimania wiki) primarily for anti-vandalism and maintenance, and wrote/used scripts (with my adminbot) to help the project by replacing thousands of templates as they were changing licences (amongst others), and am in the process of writing another (which is expected to take a lot of time, however) for the Albanian Wikipedia (see my talk page).

    While I do expect to do other tasks such as locking/blocking global accounts (and have submitted many requests to SRG, though I'm by no means close to some of the other users there), unlike some of the other stewards (and candidates), I do not expect routine anti-vandalism to be my priority as a steward (though I do have the experience as an admin of five wikis, including en.wikibooks, MediaWiki and Meta-Wiki). I am not perfect, and have made mistakes over the years, but I like to think that I've improved and am receptive to feedback. This statement is not exhaustive in terms of what I've done, and feel free to ask any questions you have.

    I primarily speak English and Malayalam (though I don't tend to use that on Wikimedia as I've never formally learned the language), and can understand basic Hindi and Dutch.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2025/Questions#Leaderboard
English: You are not eligible to vote. More information


Yes(追記) (追記ここまで)

[edit ]
  1. Sdrqaz (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  I'm willing to give them a chance, based on what I've seen of them. I think that quite a lot of their work with Global reminder bot has been commendable and some of the backlash (追記) from others (追記ここまで) has been a bit overblown. From what I've seen, Leaderboard works in good faith and is willing to seek second opinions to see if they're wrong. If they continue with that approach as a steward, they should be fine. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:05, 6 February 2025 (UTC) – clarified at 02:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply ]
  2. Arcticocean (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  arcticocean ■しかく 14:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    (削除) Minilammas (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 (削除ここまで) •  --Minilammas (talk) 14:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. Skilsdhuo (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Skilsdhuo (talk) 14:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  I understand if anyone doesn’t support this request due to the lack of GR or GS, but Leaderboard has some invaluable technical skills. They made it clear in their statement that routine anti-spam/vandalism is not the focus. shb (t • c) 14:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Tech-skilled candidate that can be really useful for the team. --Stïnger (会話) 14:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. Svartava (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Good luck! Svārtava (t ɕ) 14:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. KonstantinaG07 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  weak support, while I understand the concerns raised, I believe they have a different skillset than other candidates and already-standing stewards to offer, and that they'll be a net-positive on the team as long as they take it easy with areas they may not be as familiar (which stands for everyone) and are receptive to feedback. KonstantinaG07 (talk) 14:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. JrandWP (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Really technical, will contribute a lot for Steward community. JrandWP (talk) 15:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. Iming (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Yours sincerely, Iming 彼女の愛は、甘くて痛い。 15:24, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. Talimu0518 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Talimu0518 (talk) 15:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  11. Cooldudeseven7 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Cooldudeseven7 (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  12. Ternera (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  I appreciate Leaderboard's thought-out takes on different matters and believe they would be a net positive as a steward with their technical knowledge. Ternera (talk) 15:53, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  13. Quebecguy (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 15:53, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  14. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Barkeep49 (talk) 16:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  15. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Bencemac (talk) 16:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  16. Borhan (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Borhan (talk) 16:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  17. Ferien (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  I've interacted with Leaderboard on a few occasions now and I actually quite like the way they approach problems. One of those interactions was about the global reminder bot being enabled on simplewiki that I declined (w:simple:Wikipedia talk:Bots#Leaderbot) and I wouldn't consider their attitude on that to be combative. Their technical knowledge would certainly be a benefit to the team.--Ferien (talk) 17:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  18. XXBlackburnXx (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  I’m willing to give them a shot. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  19. JJPMaster (Eligible, checked by Svartava)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  I had to think about this one a little due to the SRB concerns, as well as this which made me concerned that you wouldn't strictly follow MVR, but my concerns were largely addressed by your answer to my question. Although the WMF researcher request was admittedly unusual, I don't view you as a hat collector, and you would be an excellent asset to the steward team, especially since I feel like we need more stewards focused on things other than SRG. JJP Mas ter (she/they) 19:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  20. Argam Forbes (Eligible, checked by Svartava)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Argam Forbes (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  21. Aopou (Eligible, checked by Svartava)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  —Aopou {talk} 19:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  22. Zafkiel GD (Eligible, checked by EPIC)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Zafkiel GD | Talk 20:02, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  23. FusionSub (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  -FusionSub (talk) 20:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  24. LR0725 (Eligible, checked by Svartava)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 20:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  25. Eihel (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  All my confidence —Eihel (talk) 22:46, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  26. Codename Noreste (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Codename Noreste (talk) 23:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  27. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Shizhao (talk) 02:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  28. Hehua (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Hehua (talk) 04:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  29. DreamRimmer (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  – DreamRimmer (talk) 05:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  30. Lookruk (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 09:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  31. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  cyrfaw (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  32. Der-Wir-Ing (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 14:40, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  33. FlyingAce (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  –FlyingAce ✈hello 16:03, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  34. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Jusjih (talk) 20:56, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  35. Osps7 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  — Osama Eid (talk) 07:00, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  36. S8321414 (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  S8321414 (talk) 11:27, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  37. Reading Beans (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Reading Beans (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  38. HelplessChild (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  HelplessChild (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  39. Cyrobyte (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Cyrobyte (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  40. JyotiPN (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  JyotiPN (talk) 00:20, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  41. Mazbel (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Mazbel (Talk) 02:50, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  42. نوفاك اتشمان (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Helpful global user and global bot-owner. نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 10:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  43. Juan90264 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Juan90264 (talk) 10:42, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  44. Hide on Rosé (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Phương Linh (thảo luận) 14:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  45. Nahum (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  His technical skills shoul;d prove an asset. Naḥum (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  46. ProcrastinatingReader (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Enthusiastic, and I think genuinely cares for the project and using their skills to make things better. I think Leaderboard is wise enough to seek second opinions in areas where they're uncomfortable, so I think they'll do fine. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:28, 10 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  47. Icandostuff (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Icandostuff (talk) 03:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  48. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:35, 11 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  49. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by EPIC)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Bluerasberry (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  50. Lollo98 (Eligible, checked by EPIC)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Lollo98 Text me 21:53, 11 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  51. Kylaix (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Kylain Aixter (СО) 23:31, 11 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  52. Veracious (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Per Stïnger. Veracious (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  53. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  20041027 tatsu(talk) 06:09, 12 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    (削除) SunDawn (Verification pending) •  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC) (削除ここまで)[reply ]
  54. Gadir (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  per SHB2000. Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 06:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  55. M7 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  M/ (talk) 09:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  56. Faendalimas (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 16:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  57. SAaphIrEblUE (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  SAaphIrEblUE (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  58. Nazgul02 (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Nazgul02 (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  59. ThiagoSousaSilveira (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  ThiagoSousaSilveira (talk) 06:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  60. Hellenic Rebel (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Hellenic Rebel (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  61. Vizziee (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Vizziee (talk) 09:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  62. Günther Pabst (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Günther Pabst (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  63. موسى (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Musa (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  64. Aurodea108 (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Aurodea108 (talk) 05:14, 16 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  65. Captain Ben Richards (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  captain Ben Richards (talk) 08:51, 16 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  66. Scoophole2021 (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Scoophole2021 (talk) 07:57, 17 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  67. Michael.C.Wright (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Leaderboard has been helpful and responsive at en.Wikinews. I worked with them on the license upgrade and the bot was extremely helpful. Michael.C.Wright (talk) 14:56, 17 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  68. Tzim78 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Tzim78 (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  69. Jeffrey Beall (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Jeffrey Beall (talk) 22:23, 17 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
      (削除) Tống Thành Hưng (削除ここまで)(Not eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu) •  Tống Thành Hưng (talk) 23:55, 17 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  70. DBrown SPS (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  DBrown SPS (talk) 02:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  71. Jeff G. (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 15:08, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  72. Ashlar (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Ashlar (talk) 15:33, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  73. Galahad (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 21:12, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  74. Voceta (Eligible, checked by Galahad)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Voceta (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  75. Kadı (Eligible, checked by Cactusisme)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Kadı Message 08:44, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  76. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Mö1997 (talk) 19:11, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  77. Tanbiruzzaman (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 21:47, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  78. Legonin (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Legonin (talk) 10:02, 21 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  79. NikosLikomitros (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  NikosLikomitros (talk) 16:54, 21 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  80. HenriHa (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  HenriHa (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  81. Babegriev (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Concerns for abuse do not outweigh candidate's technical ability and ambition to contribute. Babegriev (talk) 07:57, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  82. Unite together (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Thank you for your support in my failed GIE access request. U. T. 12:27, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  83. Starlighsky (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Starlighsky (talk) 00:39, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  84. Frostly (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Frostly (talk) 05:37, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  85. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Ok to try, hoping that you take into account comments by editors who voted "no". — Jules* talk 12:03, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  86. MrAureliusR (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  MrAureliusR (talk) 16:34, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  87. Asked42 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Asked42 (talk) 17:29, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
      (削除) Dominick (削除ここまで)(Not eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ) •  Dominick (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  88. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Taivo (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  89. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  MZaplotnik (talk) 17:13, 25 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  90. HippoLoid (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  HippoLoid (talk) 20:16, 25 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  91. CFA (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  CFA (talk) 02:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  92. Oksmel 70 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Oksmel 70 (talk) 09:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  93. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Hiàn (talk) 00:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  94. Lovelano (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Lovelano (talk) 04:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  95. Saederup92 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Saederup92 (talk) 10:56, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  96. علاء (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  --Alaa :)..! 11:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

No(追記) (追記ここまで)

[edit ]
  1. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  The candidate undoubtedly has a lot of technical skills and knowledge which might make them a good candidate. However they seem to have a tendency to try and solve technical problems by requesting permissions for themselves. I don't want to hold past issues (requests from 2021 or older) against them, but looking at more recent ones, there is a RfLA in 2023 trying to set up a global filter for logging almost all edits [1], later requesting WMF researcher permissions to access OS deleted edits globally [2] and asking for global OS access for their bot in 2024 [3]. That's to soon for me to support. Johannnes89 (talk) 14:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    Just want to acknowledge your concern there, and it's valid. Just one note: in the 2024 case the reason I decided to discuss with the stewards early-on was to prevent a repeat of what happened before that (in 2023), having learned from that experience. Leaderboard (talk) 14:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    Thanks for the reply! Perhaps a good opportunity to point out that I like your overall communication style whenever I notice your comments on SRGP or RfA, always trying to form a differentiated opinion. I see the difference between your requests in 2023 and 2024 and I also see your learnings with the GlobalReminderBot. If this trend continues, I would support a candidacy in the future. Johannnes89 (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. Seewolf (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Harald Krichel (talk) 14:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. BZPN (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  for some personal reasons that we both know. A steward should demonstrate objectivity and a neutral approach. I have no major objections beyond those raised in this section and the neutral section. BZPN (talk) 14:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. Krd (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Per Johannes89. Alone the story around Global reminder bot, with dozens of rights request even after denials, appears like a big WP:POINT issue to me. Pushing this or similar things with steward rights is not not the right thing. Sorry. Krd 16:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    Out of the hundreds of wikis I've requested rights on, the number of wikis that refused the bot (which I am fine with) is in the single digits. I'd call that normal for a bot that runs globally, and to be clear I've never re-requested rights or run the bot on such a wiki (except one accidental run). Leaderboard (talk) 16:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Svartava)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Per Johannnes89. I'm also concerned about the use of steward rights potentially for research purposes as well; the community objected against that at Steward_requests/Global_permissions/2023-03#WMF_Researcher_for_Leaderboard, and Leaderboard specifically mentioned running as a steward is an option. Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Svartava)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  This user has a tendency to invent or exaggerate problems in order to impose complicated "solutions" that inevitably lead to him urgently needing some right. To quote Xaosflux from here, these are usually things which should have "technical [fixes], or perhaps technical + a maintenance script run; certainly not a volunteer's bot to go around to hundreds of project suppressing things." I don't feel comfortable with the thought that this person will be a steward and potentially imposing these non-solutions even more. I have also not been impressed by the past discussions about these things: usually they should have requested more feedback from the community first, before coming up with a grand proposal to vote upon. They also seem to never accept that maybe some ideas are just bad and shouldn't be done. MF-W 20:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. DCB (Eligible, checked by Svartava)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  DCB (talk) 20:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Giraffer (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. Multichill (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Multichill (talk) 22:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. Takipoint123 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  ko:특수:차이/38580144 It seems like this user does not have a good idea about processes in local wikis. In KoWiki, this user tried to get bot permissions, in which after no response they went straight to Meta despite there being local processes. I really thank the user for the courage to step up, but demonstrataby poor understanding on global and local processes does not make me have confidence for this user as a steward.--Takipoint123 (talk) 23:49, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    Please see my response to EPIC below. There was no prior precedent on how such bot requests are to work (or I couldn't find one), and I just did what I thought was right at that time based on my prior reading and understanding of the process. Nowhere on kowiki did it say that I had to follow a certain process (as I highlighted to you over there), as some other wikis have done. Leaderboard (talk) 02:43, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    Korean Wikipedia has a local bot policy, and REQUIRES you to request for bot privilege through request. Even if you were not sure what to do, before you requested at Steward Requests you could have at least checked if the bot requests page were active and how long bot requests usually take in KoWiki through the page history (it takes a while, and I know it can be frusturating. But local bureaucrats do frequently check the page). At the very least you could have went to ko:백:사랑방 to ask for help, and me or other people would have gladly commented (which I don't see in your contribs). This, along with mass requesting for a whole bunch of others despite several local bureaucrats of several wikis having objections don't give me the confidence to vote in favor. My main concern is that granting of bot privilege can be very dangerous, and is usually likened to administrative permissions: it is not a simple matter of "I didn't know, there was no precedent." The care I've seen put into projects is commendable, but I just don't think that you can exercise the due caution required in the capacity as a steward based on the requests I've seen. Takipoint123 (talk) 03:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    Thank you for the feedback, but I'll continue to disagree with you here (and that's OK, it's not like we need to agree on everything). That being said, as I commented above, "several local bureaucrats of several wikis having objections " is not quite right, and the refusals I did get is normal for a globally-running bot when the percentage of such objections is in the single digits. Leaderboard (talk) 03:22, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  11. Jet Pilot (Eligible, checked by EPIC)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Jet Pilot 00:59, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  12. Aqurs1 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  aqurs ❄️ 02:34, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  13. JustARandomEditor123 (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Due to concerns raised by Johannnes89 regarding problem solving issues. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 07:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  14. Justiyaya (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Justiyaya (talk) 07:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  15. Minilammas (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Changed my mind after reading Takipoint's vote. --Minilammas (talk) 11:03, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  16. K6ka (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  17. Stjn (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  I get the frustration over the lack of local processes and local responses more than anyone, but I don’t think it justifies the responses such as in Sdrqaz’s and Takipoint123’s links. I am sure Leaderboard is a technically proficient user who does more good than bad in their current roles, but I feel like the only acceptable response to those cases is to say ‘I messed up, let’s handle this locally’, not to try to prove a point over and over again that you actually did nothing wrong for X, Y, and Z reasons. Meta people should understand more that handling matters on Meta when local processes exist should be the last resort. Sadly, with how close it is, this compels me to oppose. stjn [ru] 15:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Stjn: Just to clarify, I was referring to the backlash from other users in my link (I think you know, but just wanted to make it clear for everyone else). Sdrqaz (talk) 02:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Sdrqaz: if you wanted to clarify something for everyone else, pinging me was entirely unnecessary. I was referring to Leaderboard’s comments in your link. Backlash was maybe a bit unjustified but going over the heads of community and not apologising anywhere (even here) is also unjustified. Since you wanted me to expand any further on this. stjn [ru] 02:31, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    I wasn't taking issue with your vote. I pinged you because while I thought that you knew that I was referring to backlash from other users, I wasn't sure. Better safe than sorry. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:52, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @stijn To be clear, I did freely apologise on the ko.wiki local request, because it was never my intention to subvert local community policies and this is something I take seriously. I am only challenging claims that this is something I could have possibly known before (amongst other incorrect claims). Leaderboard (talk) 02:54, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    To me your comments read combative, not apologetic. I get the wish to get the tool you’ve worked on adopted everywhere, but the lack of policy against it was not enough of a motivation for going to Meta. Especially for such large wikis as faWP and jaWP, but even for a smaller wiki, that kind of attitude clearly wasn’t taken well and they had the right not to take it well. stjn [ru] 03:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    They? No one in these two wikis complained so I'm not sure what you mean. The only wikis that complained were nl.wikivoyage (whose feedback I worked on and eventually resolved), and ko.wiki. Leaderboard (talk) 16:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  18. Pppery (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  * Pppery * it has begun 15:55, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  19. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  dwadieff ✉ 17:40, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  20. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Rs chen 7754 19:08, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  21. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  22. Microplastic Consumer (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  There are better candidates who are seem to be less controversial and more reflective of the Wikipedia community. --Microplastic Consumer (talk) 23:59, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  23. Extraordinary Writ (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:43, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  24. Xacaranda (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Xacaranda (talk) 04:56, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  25. SCP-2000 (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  SCP -20 00 05:39, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  26. Adtonko (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Adtonko (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  27. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  --Gereon K. (talk) 12:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  28. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  29. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Competent user, however I vote no per Johannnes89. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  30. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  per Johannnes89 --Min☠︎rax «¦talk¦» 02:52, 10 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  31. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  per Johannnes89 Ameisenigel (talk) 07:59, 10 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  32. Ulanwp (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  -- Ulanwp (talk) 08:22, 10 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  33. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Svartava)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Fenikals (talk) 14:21, 10 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  34. Sennecaster (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  The comment at Johannes89's confirmation this year rubs me wrong. We all have different proficiency in English, there are questions and answers given in many languages every single year, and nitpicking someone at SC for it is not something I want to see in a steward. Sennecaster (talk) 22:35, 11 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Sennecaster, sorry but this sounds very odd. On SE confirmations, especially for someone like Johannes who has done good work, there is nothing wrong with a bit of a "friendly nitpick". My message was meant to be nothing more than "you've done really well, but maybe just keep this in mind", and I meant this as something that can be useful for them even outside Wikimedia. Like, my perception of him is not based on how he puts his quotes, and I don't see why that should rub someone the wrong way. As far as SE confirmations (and elections, and even generally), I tend to give a lot of tolerance to language proficiency, as you may have seen in my vote on another candidate this year. Leaderboard (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    Agree, the confirmation should be used to provide feedback to current stewards and I don't see a reason not to mention details like this (especially if those details don't influence the overall perception). I don't think there is any personal issue between Leaderboard and me. By the way I know about English quotation marks, I just think „..." looks nicer than "...", that's why I sometimes choose to ignore the correct style. I want to point out again that I value his experience and technical skills (as well as his commitment to the projects), but opposed because I think it's too soon – will happily support in the future [4]. Johannnes89 (talk) 10:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  35. Superspritz (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Due to past accidents, I don't trust their capability to keep a real neutral and objective position on controversial matters. Superspritz tell me 23:06, 11 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Superspritz, Sure I am not perfect, but I see no relevance between any past errors I've done and "capability to keep a real neutral and objective position on controversial matters". Some clarification on what you meant by that would be helpful. Leaderboard (talk) 03:27, 12 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  36. Edelseider (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Edelseider (talk) 09:02, 12 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  37. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Dostojewskij (talk) 18:25, 12 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  38. ChrisWx (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Per above concerns; I am worried that they may use the tools inappropriately, such as accessing oversighted data for personal research and introduction of perceived issues that require the tools for changes. Chris ☁️ (talk - contribs) 21:56, 12 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  39. EggRoll97 (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  EggRoll97 (talk) 00:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  40. SunDawn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  41. Bramfab (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Good technical management skills, but poor personal discernment and management abilities in cases where technical competence is not needed, while evaluation of human activity is required. This is not necessarily a defect, but a significant absence for the role of a steward.--Bramfab (talk) 07:57, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  42. Niryhpr (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Niryhpr (talk) 10:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  43. Cactusisme (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 12:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  44. Gymate (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Gymate (talk) 15:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  45. Alexisdepris (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •   Alexis EBRC Member 16:36, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  46. Chetsford (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Chetsford (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  47. Revi C. (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  SE Voting criteria 4.2. — regards, Revi 04:34, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  48. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  per stjn. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)     12:24, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  49. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  I personally don't think hat-collecting is compatible with the steward job. ミラP@Miraclepine 15:36, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Miraclepine Now that's a new one. When did hat-collecting come into the picture? I think I'm missing context, and clarification would be appreciated. Leaderboard (talk) 15:38, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Leaderboard: w:WP:HAT says "Hat-collecting is the process of gaining rights on Wikipedia (and other wikis [Meta included]) just to show off or to boost one's ego", and I feel one of the main concerns that you insist on getting permissions just for minor things, tend to get into untenably too many areas, have a lot of denied permissions requests, MF-Warburg's concerns, and Revi C.'s no reason is in line with that. ミラP@Miraclepine 16:07, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Miraclepine I don't want to drag this on, but the characterisation that I am just trying to get rights "just to show off or to boost one's ego" is plain wrong, when the general advice for people that need to work on admin-related areas on multiple wikis is to individually apply for local adminship on each wiki (and not apply for global sysop instead, which is a common reason that almost always gets denied). If it's the 2023-related permission issues, I did make changes subsequently to prevent such issues, but I'm aware that's a common concern amongst the voters so it's understandable if you're in that group. Leaderboard (talk) 16:31, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    Yeah I am late to the discussion but I do think this is a baseless accusation. No one's ego is being boosted and afaik Leaderboard only obtained 2 permissions last year (Meta + enwikinews sysop). I get the other oppose reasons, but calling this hat collecting is a step too far. //shb (t • c) 12:08, 16 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  50. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Unconvinced. Java Hurricane 16:36, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  51. Denis Barthel (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Denis Barthel (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  52. Argeste (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Per Takipoint123 and EPIC Argeste (talk) 22:13, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    (削除) Ikan Kekek (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)2025 (削除ここまで) •  Very constructive user on Wikivoyage, so I was looking forward to supporting, but I'm troubled by the "Generally, yes" answer to whether you plan on strictly following a guideline. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 15 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Ikan Kekek The question was specifically about minimum voting requirements and for that rule, my experience is that it needs to be interpreted strictly as can be seen at SRP. There is almost no discretion possible as a steward, even if MVR suggests that it's only a "guideline". It's something that tends to trip a lot of users - a user complained about the strictness of the rule today. Leaderboard (talk) 10:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    So why did you qualify your answer instead of saying "yes"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    @Ikan Kekek Because there may be exceptions, and more importantly the answers I am giving are based on my understanding of the rule as a non-steward. As I noted in my original answer, there could well be "unwritten" aspects to the rule that I wouldn't know without being a steward myself - which is why I qualified my answer at the start instead of making an absolute statement. In practice it'd be really rare for me to apply discretion or make exceptions without taking feedback from other stewards. Leaderboard (talk) 12:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    I don't feel satisfied with the answer. I think you should plan on following guidelines rigorously. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:05, 15 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    Ikan Kekek, I'm not trying to badger you, but I think it's unfair on Leaderboard to vote No pretty much exclusively for adding the word "generally" in an answer about guidelines when that is literally the word used to describe when guidelines should be applied here on meta. --Ferien (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    OK, fair enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:42, 16 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  53. Moguy (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Moguy (talk) 21:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  54. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Lepricavark (talk) 04:04, 16 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  55. Lentokonefani (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Lentokonefani (talk) 18:19, 16 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  56. Pavel200071 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Pavel200071 (talk) 17:25, 17 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  57. Do not follow (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  ——d—n—f (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  58. Ryme071 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Ryme071 (talk) 14:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  59. Spielvogel (Eligible, checked by Galahad)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Spielvogel (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  60. Choucas Bleu (Eligible, checked by Cactusisme)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Choucas Bleu 🐦‍⬛ 22:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  61. Alexanderps (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Alex Pereira falaê 17:33, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  62. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Solid no for me. Lacks the temperament in my opinion and in my past experience, involved themselves in places they had no place being. Praxidicae (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  63. Seqv (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Seqv (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  64. Sunnyboi18 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  The fact there is roughly about the same amount of folks voting "No" in addition to "Neutral" which is outweighing the "Yes" votes, and the justification for the latter being "Lets give him a chance" is concerning, including the comments with the "No" and "Neutral" votes. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 10:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  65. Wozal (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Wozal (talk) 14:51, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  66. Omar7812 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Omar7812 (talk) 06:55, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  67. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Ulflarsen (talk) 11:15, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  68. Doc.Heintz (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Doc.Heintz (talk) 11:16, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  69. Holder (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Holder (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  70. Lordgilman (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Lordgilman (talk) 20:38, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
      (削除) Flyingphoenixchips (削除ここまで)(Not eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ) •  Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 20:45, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  71. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 05:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  72. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  I don't trust this user. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 06:24, 25 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  73. Victor Schmidt (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  74. Count Count (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Count Count (talk) 11:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  75. Daask (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Daask (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  76. NickK (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  per Johannnes89 NickK (talk) 23:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  77. Ooligan (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Ooligan (talk) 05:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  78. Masti (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  masti <talk> 11:04, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  79. OrangKalideres (Eligible, checked by EPIC)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  OrangKalideres (talk) 13:27, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Neutral(追記) (追記ここまで)

[edit ]
  1. TenWhile6 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  --TenWhile6 14:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  2. EPIC (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  This one is hard for me to judge. Here we have a technically compentent candidate who has cross-wiki experience and is a sysop on two medium-large wikis as well as an AFH. They're engaged in several steward areas and have relevant experience. My interactions with them have also been positive, and I believe they could do well if elected. However, I've seen combative behavior from them which I dislike and could be a problem as a steward, and I do have some slight concerns about their understanding of steward policies (judging by for instance questions they have asked in past steward elections) and some previous failed permission requests. I've also seen several SRB requests from them where they have tried gaining approval for their bot (Global reminder bot) on wikis with local bureaucrats or local processes for bot approval, in many cases without having informed local bureaucrats or admins about their intention (and thus I've instead had to do it for them), but in most of these cases the locals have responded on a simple ping or email. This makes me have some concerns mainly for SRP and SRB that they will bypass local processes if they are elected as a steward, which could cause problems. With all of this combined I'm on the fence, but I'd like to thank Leaderboard for volunteering and wish them good luck. EPIC (talk) 14:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    I want to comment on this. Before requesting rights for Leaderbot, I carefully reviewed past bot operators' requests on SRB, and checked on other forums as well. I was under the impression that it was appropriate to request rights after waiting a week or two, without necessarily having to ping further. You were the main steward granting the right, and I hence deferred to you on things such as contacting users whenever necessary as I thought stewards (and not the bot operators) were supposed to do this, and I was never told that I should be emailing bureaucrats (which I have no problems doing), just like how it's the global renamer that normally posts an usurp notification and not the user being renamed. I have since modified the procedure and try to ping active bureaucrats before going to SRB. Leaderboard (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  3. A09 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  I can't decide whether to support or oppose here, as I agree with both SHB and EPIC here. This candidate has some invaluable technical skills however I'm going neutral due to some of his weird takes in the past. A09 |(pogovor) 14:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    (削除) Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 (削除ここまで) •  Neutral for now, mainly per A09 --Min☠︎rax «¦talk¦» 14:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC) Move to O. --Min☠︎rax «¦talk¦» 02:52, 10 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  4. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  I almost never vote neutral, but I think I'm landing here for now. Leaderboard, you do a large amount of good work, but every few months you request more permissions in somewhat strange ways. I appreciate the desire to help, but I think that demonstrates a bit of a lack of understanding of community norms - something very important that stewards have. Overall I think your experience would lend itself well to the role, however, so I won't oppose. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  5. V0lkanic (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  A09 summarized it well. V0lkanic (talk) 15:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  6. Wüstenspringmaus (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Wüstenspringmaus talk 15:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  7. Well very well (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Well very well (talk) 16:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  8. Alachuckthebuck (Eligible, checked by EPIC)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  my concern is the same as Krd, but balanced out by A09 and Ajraddatz's points. All the best -- Chuck Talk 17:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  9. Ankermast (Eligible, checked by EPIC)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  --Ankermast (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  10. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Svartava)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Tvcccp (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  11. Queen of Hearts (Eligible, checked by Svartava)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  per EPIC. Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  12. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  PoetVeches (talk) 21:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  13. Sink Cat (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 22:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  14. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Mini apolis 23:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  15. Pólux (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  per EPIC and A09 Pólux (talk) 02:03, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
    (削除) Cactusisme (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 (削除ここまで) •  per above Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 03:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Moved to O[reply ]
  16. Jan Myšák (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Jan Myšák (talk) 09:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  17. Ethn23 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Ethn23 (talk) 15:40, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  18. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Per EPIC and Minorax. Daniuu (talk) 19:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  19. Daisytheduck (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Daisytheduck (talk) 05:09, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  20. Ulubatli Hasan (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Hasan (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  21. Caiaffa (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Caiaffa (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  22. Ekminarin (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Rin [ T · C ] 04:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  23. Aspere (Eligible, checked by EPIC)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Aspere (talk) 17:45, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  24. Alien333 (Eligible, checked by EPIC)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  — Alien 3
    3 3     18:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  25. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Rzuwig ► 12:47, 10 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  26. Antoine.b (Eligible, checked by Svartava)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Antoine.b (talk) 14:28, 10 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  27. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Nurtenge (talk) 03:59, 11 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  28. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Never seen before... Wolverène (talk) 04:57, 11 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  29. Aca (Eligible, checked by EPIC)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Aca (talk) 21:20, 11 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  30. ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Looks fine to me, but it may be too early. ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 06:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  31. User3749 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Contributions are good, just some issues relating to communication and problem solving that have been brought up in this section and the above. I may support in the future if this improves, but now is a bit too early I think. Not enough to warrant an oppose in my opinion for now. User3749 (talk) 07:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  32. Estrellato (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Unfamiliar with the candidate Estrellato (talk) 15:59, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  33. Toadspike (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  per A09 and Ajraddatz. Toadspike (talk) 16:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  34. Tetiana Tkachuk (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Tetiana Tkachuk (talk) 21:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  35. Al Lemos (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Al Lemos (talk) 00:25, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  36. খাত্তাব হাসান (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  খাত্তাব হাসান (talk) 04:41, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  37. All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  As per EPIC and Arjaddatz's rationale. Technically competent but questionable behaviour. All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  38. Schützenpanzer (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Schützenpanzer (talk) 19:44, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  39. Tarlby (Eligible, checked by Ferien)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Tarlby (talk) 20:52, 14 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  40. Franzekafka (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Franzekafka (talk) 09:19, 16 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  41. Teles (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S ˲» 15:17, 17 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  42. Mirzoulugʻbek (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  MirzoUlug'Bek 👤💬 05:59, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  43. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Jianhui67 talk ★contribs 07:45, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  44. Brewster239 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Brewster239 (T·C·CA) 15:36, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  45. QuickWittedHare (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  QuickWittedHare (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  46. Ciell (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Ciell (talk) 08:56, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  47. Schlurcher (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Looks fine to me, but it may be too early. Schlurcher (talk) 13:20, 19 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  48. Känguru1890 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Känguru1890 (talk) 15:38, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  49. El flacucho venezolano (Eligible, checked by EPIC)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  El flacucho venezolano (talk) 21:03, 20 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  50. Enkhsaihan2005 (Eligible, checked by Galahad)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
      (削除) Joecompan (削除ここまで)(Not eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ) •  Joecompan (talk) 04:51, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  51. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Wikibenchris (talk) 16:58, 24 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  52. Brightt11 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  bright mensaje 18:59, 25 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  53. Päppi (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Päppi (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  54. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Dash77 (talk) 01:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  55. Lionel Cristiano (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Leo talk 01:00, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  56. Homeostasis07 (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Homeostasis07 (talk) 03:25, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  57. Oq10pass (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  Oq10pass (talk) 12:53, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
  58. MdsShakil (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)(削除) 2025 (削除ここまで) •  —MdsShakil (talk) 13:57, 27 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /