Meta:Requests for adminship/MZMcBride

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

RfA scheduled to end at 23:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Nominating MZMcBride for adminship. He's an active user, very helpful. I think he'll by quite a benefit to Meta. He's an admin on enwiki. bastique ^demandez! 23:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

I graciously accept the nomination. --MZMcBride 23:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

« nomination » ?... vous pouvez même dire « désignation », « cooptation », Cher Ami, puisque toute opinion contraire est immédiatement effacée par la Famille. --Budelberger 22:08, 13 December 2008 (UTC) ( ). (Félicitations ! vous êtes un Master, même ici, dans « Meta », pour profit glorieuse famille Consanguins.)[reply ]

1. Support Support Daniel (talk) 23:45, 6 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
2. Support Support Finn Rindahl 00:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
3. Support Support Thank you for your helpful contributions on this project. Cirt (talk) 04:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
4. support. --Thogo (talk) 13:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
5. Support Support He is amazing in the MediaWiki space. MBisanz ^talk 16:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
6. Support Support--Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 16:30, 7 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
7. Support Support OhanaUnited ^{Talk page} 22:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
8. Support. Won't kill Metawiki or anything like that, so sure. —Anonymous Dissident ^Talk 05:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
9. Support Support — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 06:15, 8 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
10. Support Support --Marbot 19:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
11. Support Support --.snoopy. ✉ 20:19, 8 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
12. Support Support - User mentioned (on chat) that he was concerned about his lack of opposition. Unwilling to let down a friend, I'm morally opposing his adminship, but underhandedly supporting it (see the green plussy thingy). Pretend I wrote something terrible about his [[poor [grammar|spelling]]|[lack of [morals|ethics]|[terrible [attitude|odor|interpersonal skills|acne scars]] here. Ja mata! Kylu 03:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
13. Support Support trustworthy, active, makes helpful contributions. What more could we want from an admin? Anonymous101 21:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
14. Support Support per all above --mardetanha 21:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
15. Support Support --Melancholie 22:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
16. Support Support --Fabexplosive The archive man 11:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

    (削除) Oppose Oppose --Budelberger 11:48, 12 December 2008 (UTC) ( ). (削除ここまで)All editors with an account on Meta, at least one active account on any Wikimedia project, and a link between the two, may participate in any request and give their opinion of the candidate.[reply ]

17. support, of course. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
18. Support Support good interactions with the user & they should be helpful in the mediawiki namespace. --Kanonkas 16:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
19. Support Support --Erwin(85) 21:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
20. Support Support Leinad 22:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Clear consensus so MZMcBride is our new admin --Mardetanha ^talk 23:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC) [reply ]