Steward requests/Global

• Your request might be rejected if it doesn't include the necessary information.
• Warning! This page is publicly viewable. If the account name is grossly insulting or contains personal information please contact a steward privately in #wikimedia-stewards ^connect or email your request to the stewards VRT queue at stewards-oversight@wikimedia.org (direct wiki interface) but do not post it here. Thanks.
• Warning! This is not the place to ask for locks based on your opinion that someone is disruptive. Global locks are used exclusively against vandalism and spam, not because of content disputes, not because you think that someone deserves to be globally blocked. In such cases, you should ask for local blocks at appropriate places.
• If you are globally locked, you should appeal your lock to stewards-appeals@wikimedia.org.

=== Global lock/unlock for Foo ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
* {{LockHide|username}}
* {{LockHide|username|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the name to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc. --~~~~

=== Global lock for spambots/vandals ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3}}
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the names to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc, --~~~~

• Martimc123 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

Well I wanted to be unlocked because I wanted to appeal in my account and I know I did many mistakes but I wanted to start from somewhere that's why I wanted to be unlocked well if could, Thanks for your time --109.49.183.212 11:40, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Reply

This request is being discussed. RadiX ∞ 12:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Reply

Please note the discussion on my talk as well. —DoRD talk 13:38, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Reply

Do you know what yes include that if want do you know what I don't have any secrets and I want to start from somewhere, so please note that I want one more chance. Thanks for your time 109.49.183.212 13:41, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Reply

• Diegusjaimes (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

Hi, I'm not a normal IP. I am the same user. I can't edit with my original account, because this actually locked, and i can't access its. I request unlock and ask for forgiveness for the damages caused at this time. Thanks in advance --181.61.83.227 03:25, 27 July 2017 (UTC) PD: Sorry for my englishReply

• @Bsadowski1:.--GZWDer (talk) 13:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC) Reply
• Please explain why are you evading your block with the sock Fosfarrata (talk · contribs) / Por favor explica por qué evades tu bloqueo con el títere Fosfarrata (talk · contribs).

To the Stewards, Bernard is a CU and can confirm a new block evasion [2] --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 16:24, 28 July 2017 (UTC).Reply

I created it simply to continue editing. There is no vandalism or anything bad. I am worried that Wikipedia in Spanish will be so drastic with users who want to edit for the first time, or who want to resume editing, and I am also puzzled by the fact that they consider everyone as a "toxic element" to Anyone who gets blocked. 181.61.83.227 18:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC) PD: The last text is traduced by Google"Reply

See w:WP:BE and w:WP:SOCK - Using other account to continue editing while blocked is not permitted in most Wikimedia projects, even if the editor only makes good edits.

• For Diegusjaimes: I suggest you do no edit in Spanish Wikipedia, using any account or anonymously, in no less than six months (i.e. until at least 2018年1月29日) and request an unblock there. You're free to contribute other Wikimedia projects once you are unlocked.
• For stewards: I think the account can be unlocked as long as there're no longer crosswiki issue. This allows user to make significant and useful contributions to other WMF projects (which is beneficial for unblocking in eswiki).

--GZWDer (talk) 19:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC) Reply

Comment. I believe that the initial lock is wrong on a number of grounds. 1) Socking has no impact upon the use of the primary account. 2) Socks are not against WMF terms and use, and the use of global lock is not for this purpose of locking primary accounts. If the user is to be excluded we should be using a consensus of the community discussed in a global ban rather than summary exclusion by judge and jury stewardry. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:07, 5 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• Donald Trung (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

(moved from User talk:GZWDer.) --GZWDer (talk) 14:55, 21 August 2017 (UTC) Reply

Hello, I have noticed that you commented on several global locks, well I really don't want to bother you if this is not your thing but as I can't seem to find any "Guide for appealing global locks" I would like to ask you what I could do, I am indefinitely blocked in 2 communities and I really just wish to edit in a community where I have never been blocked (Dutch Wikipedia) but because of my global lock this is not possible, what would you advise me to do? For the record I made 2 bad faith names insulting another editor (to whom I have apologised, admittedly after evading my block but I thought that he deserves kt because he wrote a good reply that I only saw after my lock), and I made accounts with a name similar to a blocking admin, well I should've read the terms of service because that's forbidden and I have read almost every rule ans guideline since my block and don't think that I'll ever break one here again, but I can't seem to establish any contact with any steward. --2405:4800:148C:AAB1:811B:7305:E235:9FEC 13:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC) (Donald Trung)Reply

Any more thoughts on this Ruslik0? Honestly, even though it would be a waste of everyone's time, I think that we could unlock and let local projects deal with this until more disruption occurs. – Ajraddatz (talk) 08:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• See the rants/long diatribes including copying problems from en-wiki with us on nl-wiki so please spare "other projects" from this. MoiraMoira (talk) 07:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC) (admin nl-wiki)::How is wanting to write articles bringing problems from tbr en-wiki to other projects? I wrote those to appeal my lock, not local blocks the only thing that keeling me locked prevents is the creation of articles and a WikiProject for numismatics, you're assuming bad faith where there should be none, all I want to do is write the articles in red links at w:nl:Gebruiker:Donald Trung, you shouldn't make bad assumptions of someone before giving them a chance. And global locks should not be undertaken to avoid a community-based global ban process as I am not a "vandalism-only" user or would you claim that the article w:nl:Chinese kèpèngs is somehow "vandalism"? --125.212.228.11 09:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC) (Donald Trung)Reply

While you were told to wait for a significant amount of time you had the bright idea of mailbomb our OTRS. Your actions showed a significant lack of maturity, insisting this way goes on showing even less maturity. Starting from now I'll start reverting your requests on sight, since you clearly decided to burn any possibility for a future unlock. --Vituzzu (talk) 09:25, 7 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• Пугачов Иван (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Пугачов Иван Иванович (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Виктор Пугачов (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Gabucho181 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Discovery Family (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• LS 85 TV Canal Trece Buenos Aires Argentina (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• EvergreenFir 5.0 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• EvergreenFir 4.0 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• EvergreenFir 3.0 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• EvergreenFir 2.0 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Evergreen 2.0 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Џойстик (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Џойстик 1 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Џойстик 2 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Џойстик 3 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Џойстик 4 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Џойстик 5 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Џойстик 6 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

Long-term abuse. --2001:470:1C:5BD:0:0:0:2 05:49, 28 August 2017 (UTC) Reply

What does Gabucho181 have to do with Пугачов Иван Петрович? Ruslik (talk) 12:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC) Reply

@Ruslik0: Gabucho181 sockpuppeted blocked en wikis (8), Пугачов Иван blocked ru 3 wikis, Пугачов Иван Петрович blocked mhr, ru, sr wikis please lock wikis. 212.94.223.32 12:53, 30 August 2017 (UTC) Reply

User:Gabucho181 didn't seem any cross-wiki abuse while have been blocked on en-wiki local, this have to deal on deletion logs for the record. SA 13 Bro (talk) 13:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC) Reply

@SA 13 Bro: Џойстик added, this is part Gabucho181 of Пугачов Иван. 212.94.223.32 13:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC) Reply

@212.94.223.32: Gabucho181 also creating sockpuppet. --83.220.238.202 08:11, 31 August 2017 (UTC) Reply

No evidence can be proven that Пугачов Иван Петрович is the sock of Gabucho181, Пугачов Иван Петрович didn't seem any blocked record on English Wikipedia and Gabucho181 didn't seem any attached accounts record on Russian Wikipedia. SA 13 Bro (talk) 01:46, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• Olopolosondro (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

sockpuppet of Renkin-Swalem / Stephane.dohet Speculoos (talk) 13:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

Done Ruslik (talk) 08:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• 이강철 양념파닭 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

Impersonation: This account impersonate User:이강철 & User:양념파닭

Vandalism: This account is suspected.

• This Account created on zh.wikipedia and contributed numerous wikis.
  • For example: fr:Taeyeon
  • See Global user Contribution
  • This wikis are not my native language. So I can't understood whether is vandalism or not.

--이강철 (talk) 12:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• (TSB-123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890) (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• (TSB-98468438648645345348348248248648384384282820420428248248248242824) (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• (TSB-98989898959359343848438468678378728872402042042844838438438) (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• (TSB-98989898965644248248248248343434864868393793782782482482786739739393939888855) (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

Long-term abuse: My Royal Young (削除) or 118 alex (削除ここまで). The account usernames look like (削除) 118 alex socks (削除ここまで), but the articles that they are editing/behavior looks like My Royal Young socks. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:C8EC:2902:781E:F93C 05:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

Update: They've admitted to being My Royal Young. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:C8EC:2902:781E:F93C 05:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

Done. RadiX ∞ 12:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• J CHI (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

This is an LTA and has abused both the English Wikipedia and Korean Wikipedia. Very likely to be a sockpuppet of 대우건설 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser ). -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. 🖉←} 14:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

Done Ruslik (talk) 18:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• Michael Jackson 109 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

Abusing multiple accounts and sock puppets of User:Никита-Родин-2002. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 14:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

Done Ruslik (talk) 18:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• (TSB-4613616461613461616436461643464946379191161828428548248345343846) (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

Another My Royal Young sock again it must be blacklisted anytime --209.242.141.28 16:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

Done Ruslik (talk) 18:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• (TSB-4613616461613461616436461643464946379191161828428548248345343846) (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

Another My Royal Young sock again it must be blacklisted anytime --209.242.141.28 16:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

Done Ruslik (talk) 18:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• (TSB-4438348345348384684384384382403486486486486486483648648540686) xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Long-term abuse: My Royal Young. @RadiX: 2601:1C0:4401:F360:109:4F88:C66C:2B8B 19:46, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

Done. RadiX ∞ 02:42, 7 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• Fouadadananachid xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Long-term abuse: Fouadadan. @RadiX: 92.236.88.235 21:48, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

Done. RadiX ∞ 02:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• Ойрат калмыки 3 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Пугачов Иван Петрович2 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

Abusing multiple accounts and sock puppets of User:Никита-Родин-2002. Locked in ruwiki. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 09:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• ChadwickBruno (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Rubye37N37 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• JacksonImd (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• ColetteWootton (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

TIA MoiraMoira (talk) 07:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• Newsome Dejuan (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )
• Hunterfairhall (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt )} • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser )

Long-term abuse: newly created sock puppets of User:Hunterfk88, globally blocked for cross-wiki vandalism. Please also see recent checkuser request: SRCU#BBC One@ro.wiki.

@RadiX: On September 4, you blocked at least two IP addresses used by these socks (as open proxies). Should we consider blocking the entire range(s)? --Pafsanias (talk) 08:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC) Reply

• Archives
  • 2025: