de la a etre la meilleure maniere de rassembler les gens et les faire faire ce qu'il faut, on va dire qu'il y a un fosse.
J'ai déjà donné plus haut le lien vers les commentaires sur G+ mais visiblement tu n'es pas allé les lire. Je te colle donc les explications sur pourquoi c'est une méthode efficace:
De Rusty Russel : "Linus' rants also form a bright line of policy for everyone, and make it clear that arguing is pointless. It does save a great deal of Linus' time; I know firsthand that some of our colleages mistake politeness for uncertainty ("No, actually, rewrite your damn code already")."
D'Ingo Molnar : "Saying "fuck" to a maintainer is a valuable tool: it gets the attention of a 100 other maintainers - as evidenced by this thread. I personally massively prefer explicit, temporary verbal violence over prolonged passive-aggressive clandestine violence.
It is actionable, deterministic, less disruptive, it scales better and it also, paradoxically, hurts less."
Et cet autre paragraphe d'Ingo : "Linux kernel maintainers, as central points of failure, can inflict a lot of damage if they deny reality.
Filtering that source of harm out is a lot more important than turning Linus into a second "you really are special!" Mommy for maintainers and developers."
De Dave Airlie : "I know I still have sub maintainers who I catch screwing with ABIs a bit too closely, and they always start trying to justify themselves with userspace was broken. I try to tell them nicely, I've noticed it has had no effect, I now curse a lot at them and stop pulling trees, suddenly they stop trying to justify their bullshit."
Je ne doute pas un instant que tu vas rétorquer que tous les devs qui sont choqués par cette brutale honnêteté sont partis et qu'il ne reste plus que les partisans de cette méthode. C'est peut-être vrai…mais le noyau semble bien se porter en dépit de ça ;-)
[^] # Re: Comme quoi y'a pas que RMS
Posté par patrick_g (site web personnel) . En réponse au journal Linus pas content. Évalué à 8. Dernière modification le 11 janvier 2013 à 22:06.
J'aime ton art de la litote.
J'ai déjà donné plus haut le lien vers les commentaires sur G+ mais visiblement tu n'es pas allé les lire. Je te colle donc les explications sur pourquoi c'est une méthode efficace:
De Rusty Russel : "Linus' rants also form a bright line of policy for everyone, and make it clear that arguing is pointless. It does save a great deal of Linus' time; I know firsthand that some of our colleages mistake politeness for uncertainty ("No, actually, rewrite your damn code already")."
D'Ingo Molnar : "Saying "fuck" to a maintainer is a valuable tool: it gets the attention of a 100 other maintainers - as evidenced by this thread. I personally massively prefer explicit, temporary verbal violence over prolonged passive-aggressive clandestine violence.
It is actionable, deterministic, less disruptive, it scales better and it also, paradoxically, hurts less."
Et cet autre paragraphe d'Ingo : "Linux kernel maintainers, as central points of failure, can inflict a lot of damage if they deny reality.
Filtering that source of harm out is a lot more important than turning Linus into a second "you really are special!" Mommy for maintainers and developers."
De Dave Airlie : "I know I still have sub maintainers who I catch screwing with ABIs a bit too closely, and they always start trying to justify themselves with userspace was broken. I try to tell them nicely, I've noticed it has had no effect, I now curse a lot at them and stop pulling trees, suddenly they stop trying to justify their bullshit."
Je ne doute pas un instant que tu vas rétorquer que tous les devs qui sont choqués par cette brutale honnêteté sont partis et qu'il ne reste plus que les partisans de cette méthode. C'est peut-être vrai…mais le noyau semble bien se porter en dépit de ça ;-)