le seul ***intéret*** (ou particularité) était de faire tourner des applications windows il me semble.....
deux citations du test:
I didn't get Office 97, Publisher 2000, or well, any other application that I tried installing to run at all in Lindows. Yes, I tried even old 16bit applications and very simple games. So there went that idea... So if you want to use Windows Type Applications, you'd better find a Linux alternative for it. Or, you pretty much are out of luck. I can see why the "Run Windows Programs" thing in Lindows has been pushed aside. "Gimp" is a very capable Graphics Editor in Linux, in case you didn't know. So you aren't really out of luck on doing graphics editing. If that's your bag... Next page, Gaming and Summary!
et surtout :
Windows compatibility stated in the initial project of Lindows, is pretty much flawed, and abandoned now
# Re: Essai de la Lindows 2.0 (en anglais)
Posté par farib . En réponse à la dépêche Essai de la Lindows 2.0 (en anglais). Évalué à 1.
deux citations du test:
I didn't get Office 97, Publisher 2000, or well, any other application that I tried installing to run at all in Lindows. Yes, I tried even old 16bit applications and very simple games. So there went that idea... So if you want to use Windows Type Applications, you'd better find a Linux alternative for it. Or, you pretty much are out of luck. I can see why the "Run Windows Programs" thing in Lindows has been pushed aside. "Gimp" is a very capable Graphics Editor in Linux, in case you didn't know. So you aren't really out of luck on doing graphics editing. If that's your bag... Next page, Gaming and Summary!
et surtout :
Windows compatibility stated in the initial project of Lindows, is pretty much flawed, and abandoned now
( dans les "bad" en conclusion)
moralité : circulez y'a (vraiement) rien a voir.