" SPEC2000 and SPEC95 benchmark suites are now used daily to monitor performance of the generated code.According to the SPECInt2000 results on an AMD Athlon CPU, the code generated by GCC 3.1 is 6% faster on the average (8.2% faster with profile feedback) compared to GCC 3.0. The code produced by GCC 3.0 is about 2.1% faster compared to 2.95.3. Tests were done using the -O2 -march=athlon command-line options."
Source : http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html(...)
Concernant KDE, l'accéleration est surtout due à une amélioration des performance du compilateur C++ (pre-linkage ).
[^] # Re: Juste une question...
Posté par Laurent Saint-Michel . En réponse à la dépêche GCC 3.2. Évalué à 6.
" SPEC2000 and SPEC95 benchmark suites are now used daily to monitor performance of the generated code.According to the SPECInt2000 results on an AMD Athlon CPU, the code generated by GCC 3.1 is 6% faster on the average (8.2% faster with profile feedback) compared to GCC 3.0. The code produced by GCC 3.0 is about 2.1% faster compared to 2.95.3. Tests were done using the -O2 -march=athlon command-line options."
Source : http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html(...)
Concernant KDE, l'accéleration est surtout due à une amélioration des performance du compilateur C++ (pre-linkage ).
A+