Parmis les 10 premiers, on trouve:
2 Linux
4 NetBSD
1 FreeBSD
et...
3 Windows, ayant respectivement:
- 797d 12h 59m
- 707d 9h 4m
- 589d 23h 14m
Je tiens à signaler tout de suite aux personnes qui oseraient dire "qui a dis que Windows était pas stable?" que on trouve ça dans la FAQ:
Does a high uptime mean an OS is stable?
Not necessarily. This is a common misconception. Uptime alone is merely a measure of how long a system has been continuously running, and does not always take into account how hard that system has been working during that time. Almost any OS, if it has nothing at all to do, will run for a very long time without having any trouble. But only a very good OS on solid hardware will achieve a high uptime while being put to thorough use. We try to compensate for this by allowing clients to report CPU usage and average idle time data, but not all clients support these features yet.
# Les 10 premiers.
Posté par Anonyme . En réponse à la dépêche Record d'uptime. Évalué à 10.
2 Linux
4 NetBSD
1 FreeBSD
et...
3 Windows, ayant respectivement:
- 797d 12h 59m
- 707d 9h 4m
- 589d 23h 14m
Je tiens à signaler tout de suite aux personnes qui oseraient dire "qui a dis que Windows était pas stable?" que on trouve ça dans la FAQ:
Does a high uptime mean an OS is stable?
Not necessarily. This is a common misconception. Uptime alone is merely a measure of how long a system has been continuously running, and does not always take into account how hard that system has been working during that time. Almost any OS, if it has nothing at all to do, will run for a very long time without having any trouble. But only a very good OS on solid hardware will achieve a high uptime while being put to thorough use. We try to compensate for this by allowing clients to report CPU usage and average idle time data, but not all clients support these features yet.