En comparant mplayer avec xine ou aviplay , mon proc est moins sollicité en lisant des films DiVX en plein écran 1600x1200. Voilà.
À propos du fork, il faut lire l'ancienne news sur la page de mplayer:
He forked because we didn't accept his patch: it brings unneeded threads into MPlayer - threadlessness is the main feature of MPlayer, compared to other Linux players like Xine and avifile. Nick writes his method gains 300% speed.. This is not true. His method gains not speed but smoothness - if you have a movie that runs slow with MPlayer, MPlayerXP will not help you. It helps only in some rare files on about ~400Mhz Intel speed category systems, but it won't be faster decode (total decoding time will be the same).
[^] # Re: et mplayer ?
Posté par fantomaxe . En réponse à la dépêche Le multimédia sous Linux. Évalué à 10.
À propos du fork, il faut lire l'ancienne news sur la page de mplayer:
He forked because we didn't accept his patch: it brings unneeded threads into MPlayer - threadlessness is the main feature of MPlayer, compared to other Linux players like Xine and avifile. Nick writes his method gains 300% speed.. This is not true. His method gains not speed but smoothness - if you have a movie that runs slow with MPlayer, MPlayerXP will not help you. It helps only in some rare files on about ~400Mhz Intel speed category systems, but it won't be faster decode (total decoding time will be the same).
Visiblement ce n'est pas si convaincant ...