bah oui, je pense pas que Carmack serait content qu'une boîte se fasse du beurre sur son code sans respecter la GPL
D'ailleurs, Carmack note bien dans le readme du source de Quake 1 :
[...] you can do anything you want with the code, including sell your new version. The catch is that if you distribute new binary versions, you are required to make the entire source code available for free to everyone.
et, plus bas :
If you want to do something commercial and you just can't bear to have your source changes released, we could still negotiate a separate license agreement (for $$$), but I would encourage you to just live with the GPL.
[^] # Re: Toujours les même problèmes
Posté par Julien Jorge (site web personnel) . En réponse au journal Nexuiz et Xonotic. Évalué à 6.
D'ailleurs, Carmack note bien dans le readme du source de Quake 1 :
[...] you can do anything you want with the code, including sell your new version. The catch is that if you distribute new binary versions, you are required to make the entire source code available for free to everyone.
et, plus bas :
If you want to do something commercial and you just can't bear to have your source changes released, we could still negotiate a separate license agreement (for $$$), but I would encourage you to just live with the GPL.