Il me semble que SVN n'est pas du tout le père de GIT. Je penche plutot pour (grand) fère ennemi!
(Car il faut se rappeler que pour Linus, SVN est l'exemple même de ce qu'un SCM ne doit pas être...
Voir la page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_%28software%29
et la citation issue de cette page :
"For the first 10 years of kernel maintenance, we literally used tarballs and patches, which is a much superior source control management system than CVS is, but I did end up using CVS for 7 years at a commercial company [Transmeta] and I hate it with a passion. When I say I hate CVS with a passion, I have to also say that if there are any SVN (Subversion) users in the audience, you might want to leave. Because my hatred of CVS has meant that I see Subversion as being the most pointless project ever started. The slogan of Subversion for a while was "CVS done right", or something like that, and if you start with that kind of slogan, there's nowhere you can go. There is no way to do CVS right."
[^] # Feux de l'amour
Posté par cosmocat . En réponse au journal Acronymania. Évalué à 2.
(Car il faut se rappeler que pour Linus, SVN est l'exemple même de ce qu'un SCM ne doit pas être...
Voir la page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_%28software%29
et la citation issue de cette page :
"For the first 10 years of kernel maintenance, we literally used tarballs and patches, which is a much superior source control management system than CVS is, but I did end up using CVS for 7 years at a commercial company [Transmeta] and I hate it with a passion. When I say I hate CVS with a passion, I have to also say that if there are any SVN (Subversion) users in the audience, you might want to leave. Because my hatred of CVS has meant that I see Subversion as being the most pointless project ever started. The slogan of Subversion for a while was "CVS done right", or something like that, and if you start with that kind of slogan, there's nowhere you can go. There is no way to do CVS right."
)