Dans les commentaires de l'article du développeur d'x264 on peut lire :
# Mathias Says:
[...] And I also wonder, if there was that high penalty, how did Windows compare to encoding on Linux and how does it compare now? And this is all coming with 2.6.32?
# Dark Shikari Says:
[...]
@Mathias
Yes, it was probably slower than Windows. This explains a number of benchmarks I’ve seen recently where Windows trashes Linux at the same applications (when there’s really no good reason for it to do so).
And yes, it’s all coming in 2.6.32.
La régression était connue mais son origine n'avait pas était éclaircie semble-t-il
[^] # Re: Multi-OS
Posté par monde_de_merde . En réponse au journal Où il est question de BFS, d' x264 et de performance du noyau. Évalué à 7.
# Mathias Says:
[...] And I also wonder, if there was that high penalty, how did Windows compare to encoding on Linux and how does it compare now? And this is all coming with 2.6.32?
# Dark Shikari Says:
[...]
@Mathias
Yes, it was probably slower than Windows. This explains a number of benchmarks I’ve seen recently where Windows trashes Linux at the same applications (when there’s really no good reason for it to do so).
And yes, it’s all coming in 2.6.32.
La régression était connue mais son origine n'avait pas était éclaircie semble-t-il