Je me réponds à moi-même, j'ai trouvé la réponse sur dot.kde.org :
The simple fact behind this is that Nokia is less reliant on the income from Qt licensing than Trolltech (now Qt Software) was, and this has given Qt Software more room to approach the market with more permissive licensing strategies in order to increase adoption of the Qt toolkit.
[^] # Re: Une question bête ...
Posté par soulflyb (Mastodon) . En réponse au journal Qt LGPL!. Évalué à 1.
The simple fact behind this is that Nokia is less reliant on the income from Qt licensing than Trolltech (now Qt Software) was, and this has given Qt Software more room to approach the market with more permissive licensing strategies in order to increase adoption of the Qt toolkit.