Oui oui tu viens de demontrer que tu te pretends developpeurs mais que c'est totalement faux. Bien joue.
Tu ne trompes personne guignol, ton lien est vide. Il n'explique rien quand a l'utilite de l'interface, dans quels cas l'utiliser, ce qu'elle amene, ...
Ton lien par rapport a l'element word97 ne montre rien du tout juste que un des commentaires de la France disait:
Et si tu lisais ce que je dis ? C'est precise clairement dans mon post :
2.15.3.64 useWord97LineBreakRules (Emulate Word 97 East Asian Line Breaking) This element specifies that applications should perform specific calculations (detailed below) when determining inter-character spacing under certain conditions. These calculations would not normally be considered correct. Typically, the behaviors specified by the following elements are applied unconditionally: The autoSpaceDE (§2.3.1.2) and autoSpaceDN (§2.3.13) elements The topLinePunct (§2.3.1.43) element The compatibility element described in this subclause, when present with a val attribute value of true (or equivalent), specifies that applications should ignore the settings listed above in the following scenarios: 1. If an ideographic character and a non-ideographic/numeric character are logically adjacent (ignoring all content which is not within a t element), but separated by a field boundary, i.e.: The first character is within a fldSimple element, but the second is not. The characters are separated by a fldChar element with a fldCharType attribute value of end Then any appropriate inter-character spacing should be omitted. [Note: Inter-character spacing should still be calculated correctly within the field result. end note] ...
mais clairement tu n'as meme pas fait l'effort de lire ce que j'ecris, trop occupe a essayer de pourrir la discussion comme a ton habitude.
[^] # Re: HS
Posté par pasBill pasGates . En réponse au journal Microsoft Windows dans les ordinateurs : un autre argument que la vent liée ?. Évalué à 1.
Tu ne trompes personne guignol, ton lien est vide. Il n'explique rien quand a l'utilite de l'interface, dans quels cas l'utiliser, ce qu'elle amene, ...
Ton lien par rapport a l'element word97 ne montre rien du tout juste que un des commentaires de la France disait:
Et si tu lisais ce que je dis ? C'est precise clairement dans mon post :
cf. http://www.dis29500.org/fr-0069/ dans la tab "proposed disposition" ils l'ont ajoutee a la doc d'OpenXML revisee.
Si tu cliques sur la tab, tu verras :
2.15.3.64 useWord97LineBreakRules (Emulate Word 97 East Asian Line Breaking) This element specifies that applications should perform specific calculations (detailed below) when determining inter-character spacing under certain conditions. These calculations would not normally be considered correct. Typically, the behaviors specified by the following elements are applied unconditionally: The autoSpaceDE (§2.3.1.2) and autoSpaceDN (§2.3.13) elements The topLinePunct (§2.3.1.43) element The compatibility element described in this subclause, when present with a val attribute value of true (or equivalent), specifies that applications should ignore the settings listed above in the following scenarios: 1. If an ideographic character and a non-ideographic/numeric character are logically adjacent (ignoring all content which is not within a t element), but separated by a field boundary, i.e.: The first character is within a fldSimple element, but the second is not. The characters are separated by a fldChar element with a fldCharType attribute value of end Then any appropriate inter-character spacing should be omitted. [Note: Inter-character spacing should still be calculated correctly within the field result. end note] ...
mais clairement tu n'as meme pas fait l'effort de lire ce que j'ecris, trop occupe a essayer de pourrir la discussion comme a ton habitude.