Posté par iug .
En réponse au journal GPLv3.
Évalué à 2.
Bon sinon, vu le nombre de brevets en circulation, ca va devenir de plus en plus tendu de diffuser des softs libres avec de telles clauses.
La GPLv2 interdit déjà de diffuser des logiciels dont on sait manifestement qu'ils contreviennent à des brevets.
"We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all."
La GPLv3 vient au contraire assouplir les clauses de la GPLv2 qui étaient :
"7. If, as a consequence of a court judgment or allegation of patent infringement or for any other reason (not limited to patent issues), conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot distribute so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may not distribute the Program at all. For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to refrain entirely from distribution of the Program.
If any portion of this section is held invalid or unenforceable under any particular circumstance, the balance of the section is intended to apply and the section as a whole is intended to apply in other circumstances.
It is not the purpose of this section to induce you to infringe any patents or other property right claims or to contest validity of any such claims; this section has the sole purpose of protecting the integrity of the free software distribution system, which is implemented by public license practices. Many people have made generous contributions to the wide range of software distributed through that system in reliance on consistent application of that system; it is up to the author/donor to decide if he or she is willing to distribute software through any other system and a licensee cannot impose that choice. "
[^] # Re: joli sophisme
Posté par iug . En réponse au journal GPLv3. Évalué à 2.
La GPLv2 interdit déjà de diffuser des logiciels dont on sait manifestement qu'ils contreviennent à des brevets.
La GPLv3 vient au contraire assouplir les clauses de la GPLv2 qui étaient :