Devant une telle ignorance feinte de ta part alors que la page même de DBUS précise bien qu'il est plus complexe que DCOP, je me contenterais d'un :
Ta gueule.
"The additional complexity of D-Bus arises from its separation of object references vs. bus names vs. interfaces as distinct concepts, and its support for one-to-one connections in addition to connections over the bus. The libdbus reference implementation has a lot of API to support multiple bindings and main loops, and performs data validation and out-of-memory handling in order to support secure applications such as the systemwide bus."
Et un détail croustillant :
"D-Bus is probably somewhat slower than DCOP due to data validation and more "layers" in the reference implementation. A comparison hasn't been posted to the list though. "
[^] # Re: Phonon
Posté par ragnar . En réponse au journal Vous voulez krasher ? (KDE4 inside). Évalué à 9.
Ta gueule.
"The additional complexity of D-Bus arises from its separation of object references vs. bus names vs. interfaces as distinct concepts, and its support for one-to-one connections in addition to connections over the bus. The libdbus reference implementation has a lot of API to support multiple bindings and main loops, and performs data validation and out-of-memory handling in order to support secure applications such as the systemwide bus."
Et un détail croustillant :
"D-Bus is probably somewhat slower than DCOP due to data validation and more "layers" in the reference implementation. A comparison hasn't been posted to the list though. "