While we are not fanatical about the look and feel of a system, one of the primary reasons we are all working on an OpenStep system is the superior design and consistent interface defined in the specification. We will generally avoid specifying a look for GNUstep, except where not doing so may degrade the consistency of the interface. However, the feel of the interface is more deeply embedded in the specification and we agree that this aspect of an interface design is vital to the aesthetic appeal and user-friendliness of a system. We in general like the NeXT GUI, at least the fact that it does provide a uniform look and feel, and will probably continue to support this style.
Il le restera, gris et moche, pour de nobles raisons certes, mais personnellement je trouve démotivant de travailler une appli qui sera désespérément moche.
[^] # Re: Et l'interopérabilité ?
Posté par Anonyme . En réponse au journal contribuer au libre. Évalué à 3.
Look and Feel
While we are not fanatical about the look and feel of a system, one of the primary reasons we are all working on an OpenStep system is the superior design and consistent interface defined in the specification. We will generally avoid specifying a look for GNUstep, except where not doing so may degrade the consistency of the interface. However, the feel of the interface is more deeply embedded in the specification and we agree that this aspect of an interface design is vital to the aesthetic appeal and user-friendliness of a system. We in general like the NeXT GUI, at least the fact that it does provide a uniform look and feel, and will probably continue to support this style.
Il le restera, gris et moche, pour de nobles raisons certes, mais personnellement je trouve démotivant de travailler une appli qui sera désespérément moche.