Vole ? Ca reste a prouver, le reglement a l'amiable pourrait l'etre pour plein de raisons, genre piquer les ingenieurs a DEC, etc...
Ils n'ont pas vole le code [...] ils ont donc logiquement repris les memes concepts et architecture, mais ils ont reecrit le code de 0
Quatre sources indépendantes affirmant la même chose, ça t'ira comme preuve ou il faut que je te fournisse la totalité du code source incriminé pour que tu admettes que c'est vrai ?
http://www.jmusheneaux.com/index10.htm
« 1989 (VMS) Digital sued Microsoft (over code of Digital VMS) eventually paid 150ドル million & formed an Alliance with Digital (below) » http://tonga.globat.com/~jmusheneaux.com/index.html
« 1988 - Dave Cutler & Team (20 people) quit Digital , go to Microsoft. Digital also believed David Cutler brought VMS code "Mica" to Microsoft & Digital sued Microsoft in 1995. » http://www.windowsitpro.com/Articles/Print.cfm?ArticleID=715(...)
« According to inside sources, many portions of NT’s code and even the comments were identical to Mica. As a result, Digital sued Microsoft. » http://www.melbournelinux.com/nt_history.html
« After NT was released Digital engineers noticed striking similarities between Microsoft's "New Technology" and VMS. Reference [1] gives a long list of similarities between internal workings of NT and VMS. There is even a list of direct translations of VMS to NT terminologies ("Interrupt Priority Level" in VMS is the same as "Interrupt Request Level" in Windows NT, etc). To divert a legal action threatened by Digital, in 1995 Microsoft payed to Digital between 65 million and 100 million dollars [3]. »
[^] # Re: C'est bien, en effet
Posté par Frédéric Lopez . En réponse à la dépêche Des licences "Shared Source" de Microsoft.... Évalué à 5.
Quatre sources indépendantes affirmant la même chose, ça t'ira comme preuve ou il faut que je te fournisse la totalité du code source incriminé pour que tu admettes que c'est vrai ?
http://www.jmusheneaux.com/index10.htm
« 1989 (VMS) Digital sued Microsoft (over code of Digital VMS) eventually paid 150ドル million & formed an Alliance with Digital (below) »
http://tonga.globat.com/~jmusheneaux.com/index.html
« 1988 - Dave Cutler & Team (20 people) quit Digital , go to Microsoft. Digital also believed David Cutler brought VMS code "Mica" to Microsoft & Digital sued Microsoft in 1995. »
http://www.windowsitpro.com/Articles/Print.cfm?ArticleID=715(...)
« According to inside sources, many portions of NT’s code and even the comments were identical to Mica. As a result, Digital sued Microsoft. »
http://www.melbournelinux.com/nt_history.html
« After NT was released Digital engineers noticed striking similarities between Microsoft's "New Technology" and VMS. Reference [1] gives a long list of similarities between internal workings of NT and VMS. There is even a list of direct translations of VMS to NT terminologies ("Interrupt Priority Level" in VMS is the same as "Interrupt Request Level" in Windows NT, etc). To divert a legal action threatened by Digital, in 1995 Microsoft payed to Digital between 65 million and 100 million dollars [3]. »