C'est vieux.
Vous l'avez probablement déjà lu 17x, dont 18x ici.
Voici un texte écrit par l'auteur de TAOCP sur ChatGPT version 2023
Preface: Since one of today's popular recreations is to play with chatGPT, I decided on 07 April 2023 to try my own little experiment, as part of a correspondence with Stephen Wolfram. The results were sufficiently interesting that I passed them on to a few friends the next day, and I've also been mentioning them in conversation when the topic comes up. So I was asked to post the story online, and here it is (lightly edited)!
Well this has been interesting indeed. Studying the task of how to fake it certainly leads to insightful subproblems galore. As well as fun conversations during meals.
I find it fascinating that novelists galore have written for decades about scenarios that might occur after a "singularity" in which superintelligent machines exist. But as far as I know, not a single novelist has realized that such a singularity would almost surely be preceded by a world in which machines are 0.01% intelligent (say), and in which millions of real people would be able to interact with them freely at essentially no cost.
I myself shall certainly continue to leave such research to others, and to devote my time to developing concepts that are authentic and trustworthy. And I hope you do the same.
J'ai lu un avis de Linus du meme ordre, moins littéraire et plus direct : "90% de l'IA c'est du marketing, attendons 5 ans histoire de voir ce que ca donne".
# Qu'en dit Donald Knuth ?
Posté par Thomas (site web personnel) . En réponse à la dépêche Une intelligence artificielle libre est-elle possible ?. Évalué à 4.
C'est vieux.
Vous l'avez probablement déjà lu 17x, dont 18x ici.
Voici un texte écrit par l'auteur de TAOCP sur ChatGPT version 2023
Le texte entier est ici
Conclusion du pape.
Je vous laisse traduire.
J'ai lu un avis de Linus du meme ordre, moins littéraire et plus direct : "90% de l'IA c'est du marketing, attendons 5 ans histoire de voir ce que ca donne".