Je dois avouer que je ne sais pas ce que veut dire « mining software repositories for open innovation in two-sided markets. ».
Voici ce qu'elle m'avait écrit :
I saw your mention on GitHub and thought it would be the best to directly contact you. I am very surprised as this is the first time I am receiving such feedback after running the same process for few semester and over more than 25 active OSS projects and I hope things can be explained here.
My goal is to train people who can understand the value and admire the welcoming community of OSS while crowdsourcing good code design for the projects that are of public interest. The common ethics and process of OSS allows any individual to make a contribution of what they believe is worthwhile. Of course it is the community/owner decision if the change is of a value to be merged or not. To this extend I find that the students are mostly following the same agenda. These students are trying their best to improve the code. I understand that as they are being trained not all these changes are in the context or the most highly engineered solution in your opinion; but needless to emphasize they are sincerely trying their best. Of course, we understand that you might not want to merge these changes or accept the pull requests.
I hope that the above clarifies the situation and please don't hesitate to let me know in case of any further questions.
[^] # Re: Il faut prévenir le prof... à chaque fois
Posté par moules . En réponse au journal Doctoshotgun pris d'assaut par le variant étudiant. Évalué à 10.
Je dois avouer que je ne sais pas ce que veut dire « mining software repositories for open innovation in two-sided markets. ».
Voici ce qu'elle m'avait écrit :
Concernant « good code design » on a pas la même notion.