<blockquote> Why didn't you release Qt for Windows under GPL?
The GNU GPL and the Trolltech QPL are open-source, respectively Free Software licenses. Note the capital "F". We are not talking "free" as in "free beer", but "Free" as in "Free Speech". We released Qt/X11 under those licenses, because it runs as major component on totally Free operating systems, such as GNU/Linux and FreeBSD. Once Microsoft Windows is completely open source, we will reconsider.
</blockquote>
[^] # Re: QT/Mac passe en double-licence
Posté par un_brice (site web personnel) . En réponse à la dépêche QT/Mac passe en double-licence. Évalué à 4.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/noncomm.html#q43(...)
<blockquote>
Why didn't you release Qt for Windows under GPL?
The GNU GPL and the Trolltech QPL are open-source, respectively Free Software licenses. Note the capital "F". We are not talking "free" as in "free beer", but "Free" as in "Free Speech". We released Qt/X11 under those licenses, because it runs as major component on totally Free operating systems, such as GNU/Linux and FreeBSD. Once Microsoft Windows is completely open source, we will reconsider.
</blockquote>