En tant que participant à OpenBeOS, qui utilise la licence MIT (qualifiée de FreeSoftware, compatible par GNU IIRC), je voudrais bien que mon projet soit représenté. Je ne suis pas sur de pouvoir participer, mais peut-être quelqu'un d'autre pourra.
Je viens de poster sur la ml générale, qui est accessible par http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=openbeos(...)
Mon post:
-----------------------
Taken that OpenBeOS can be qualified as FreeSoftware
(if you don't trust me just check: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html(...) ),
it would be a great thing if someone fromthe team could represent
us at the Libre Software Meeting, which is a meeting for all FreeSoftware communities, held in Frence, 9-12 July: http://rencontresmondiales.org/(...)
I think we could fit in those categories:
- Free software for businesses (We are aiming to be "reused" by commercial distros),
- Kernel and operating system programming (where we certainly have material to discus the goods and bads of our (and BeOS') kernel),
- Databases (where the BFS indices and the old version of BFS with its zookeeper would demonstrate M$ still doesn't invent anything).
# et OpenBeOS ?
Posté par Francois Revol (site web personnel) . En réponse à la dépêche Recherche directeurs de thème. Évalué à 4.
Je viens de poster sur la ml générale, qui est accessible par
http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=openbeos(...)
Mon post:
-----------------------
Taken that OpenBeOS can be qualified as FreeSoftware
(if you don't trust me just check: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html(...) ),
it would be a great thing if someone fromthe team could represent
us at the Libre Software Meeting, which is a meeting for all FreeSoftware communities, held in Frence, 9-12 July:
http://rencontresmondiales.org/(...)
You can see the draft schedule here:
http://rencontresmondiales.org/program/(...)
I think we could fit in those categories:
- Free software for businesses (We are aiming to be "reused" by commercial distros),
- Kernel and operating system programming (where we certainly have material to discus the goods and bads of our (and BeOS') kernel),
- Databases (where the BFS indices and the old version of BFS with its zookeeper would demonstrate M$ still doesn't invent anything).
Any comment ?