"The leaders of each of those projects will decide if they want to enforce signing, keep it as a setting, or deactivate it by default. We haven't heard about any other applications planning to support this." https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension_Signing
[^] # Re: Et Thunderbird ??
Posté par Zenitram (site web personnel) . En réponse au journal La fin du "permissive add-on model" chez Mozilla, ou comment flinguer une base d'extensions. Évalué à 4.
"The leaders of each of those projects will decide if they want to enforce signing, keep it as a setting, or deactivate it by default. We haven't heard about any other applications planning to support this."
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension_Signing
"Also the prevailing view so far is that we will not require addon signing."
Chair, Thunderbird Project
https://discourse.mozilla-community.org/t/webextensions-api-and-deprecation-of-xul-xpcom-and-xbl/3459
Pour la partie XUL:
"I would say that we will delay as long as possible deprecating XUL and XPCOM."
Chair, Thunderbird Project
https://discourse.mozilla-community.org/t/webextensions-api-and-deprecation-of-xul-xpcom-and-xbl/3459
La partie signature n'est pas un choix technologique.