On va devoir tous passer sur brtfs si on utilise systemd ?
Ben non.
There's no need to fully move to a system that uses only btrfs and follows strictly this sub-volume scheme. For example, we intend to provide implicit support for systems that are installed on ext4 or xfs, or that are put together with traditional packaging tools such as RPM or dpkg: if the the user tries to install a runtime/app/framework/os image on a system that doesn't use btrfs so far, it can just create a loop-back btrfs image in /var, and push the data into that. Even us developers will run our stuff like this for a while, after all this new scheme is not particularly useful for highly individualized systems, and we developers usually tend to run systems like that.
"Quand certains râlent contre systemd, d'autres s'attaquent aux vrais problèmes." (merci Sinma !)
[^] # Re: btrfs
Posté par xcomcmdr . En réponse au journal Marque page sur l'unification possible des systèmes Linux. Évalué à 7.
Ben non.
"Quand certains râlent contre systemd, d'autres s'attaquent aux vrais problèmes." (merci Sinma !)