Showing posts with label Dell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dell. Show all posts

Monday, March 4, 2019

Solaris 11: Hardware Compatibility List - 2019q1

Solaris 11: Hardware Compatibility List - 2019q1

Abstract

For those who are covering the life of real UNIX systems, a good place to track the progress of Solaris has been the Hardware Compatibility List. For the Q1 quarter of 2019, it may be helpful for readers to understand what the latest hardware is, that has been certified for Oracle Solaris, to execute 2019 purchases.

[Oracle Logo, courtesy Oracle Corporation]

Oracle's Submissions


Fujitsu's Submissions

Fujitsu's most recent submission - SPARC M-12 on 2017年07月10日 for Solaris 11.3 & 11.4.
Interestingly enough, also certified is Solaris 10 1/13 [aka Solaris 10 Update 11]!

[Dell Logo, courtesy Dell Corporation]

Dell Additions

Dell continues to submit hardware into the Hardware Compatibility List.
They included 3x submissions:
  1. 2018年11月14日 PowerEdge R640 - 2x socket, 8x cores/socket, Intel Bronze 3106 CPU @ 1.70GHz
  2. 2018年12月20日 PowerEdge R840 - 4x socket, 4x cores/socket, Intel Gold 5122 CPU @ 3.60GHz
  3. 2019年01月15日 PowerEdge R740 - 2x socket, 14x cores/socket, Intel Gold 5120 CPU @ 2.20GHz
All of these were for Solaris 11.4.


The Odd Man Out

There is a Chinese outsourcing company which also appears on the HCL, called Inspur.
They have 2x submissions:
  1. 2018年11月08日 NF5280M5 - 2x socket 8x core/socket, Intel Silver 4110
  2. 2018年11月15日 NF5180M5 - 2x socket, 24x core/socket, Intel Platinum 8176
Inspur was certifying for Solaris 11.4.



Thursday, February 21, 2013

Itanium: Another Step Closer to Death

Itanium: Another Step Closer to Death
Abstract:
Intel had produced the Itanium architecture to compete in the higher-end 64 bit arena and eventually sun-set their aging 32 bit x64 architecture. With the release of AMD's x64 architecture, and vendors such as Sun Microsystems abandoning the Itanium roadmap for AMD x64 - pressure was placed upon Intel to include 64 bit instructions in the x86 chipset. Now with Intel x86 supporting 64 bit processing, there is little reason for Itanium to exist, placing pressure on remaining Itanum system vendors.

[Artist depiction of the Sinking of the Titanic]

Intel Itanium: The Sinking Chip
In 1999, Sun started a port of Solaris to Itanium, but it was Solaris support for Itanium was abandoned 2000, was considered again in 2004, but abandoned. Itanium servers were dropped by IBM in 2005. Dell kills Itanium servers in 2005. CentOS drops Itanium support in 2007. In 2009, NetMgt reported that Red Hat killed support for Intel Itanium. in 2010, Microsoft Network Management reported Microsoft killed support for Intel Itanium. Gelato ends Linux on Itanium in academic HPC environments. Oracle dropped future Intel Itanium development in March 2011, but HP sued. Network management published in March 2012 that it became clear in court proceedings that Oracle was right, Intel Itanium is dead, but Oracle had to provide software support, anyway.

HP Wins & Loses:
After winning a lawsuit against Oracle, Intel announces plans to slow Itanium development. Itanium will not receive the newer socket update, to capture newer hardware features, but will merely receive an in-socket speed-bumb.
PC World has just noticed an Intel posting from late January, saying that Kittson would remain socket-compatible with the current Itanium 9300 and 9500 CPUs. Sticking a new processor in an older motherboard can still yield speed improvements, but you'll miss out on new, chipset-dependent advancements—support for faster RAM, newer RAM standards (like the upcoming DDR4), and new versions of PCI Express, SATA, and USB, among other thngs.
Clearl, HP is in a world-of-hurt. New Itanium servers are not coming.

[Itanium & Inspur image, courtesy The Register]
Itanium: Moving to China?
In April 2011, Chinese announce plans to build servers on Itanium. Huawei and Inspur announce plans to build Itanium servers. What OS will those servers run - is HP it the only owner of an OS on Itanium? One can't imagine that HP will share it's OS with a hardware competitor, unless they plan on abandoning the hardware market for Itanium, and charging them an OS fee. Will HP become an OS vendor? Perhaps HP will sell OpenVMS through them?

Conclusions:
It may have been better for HP to purchase Sun SPARC & Solaris, to migrate their Itanium systems over to SPARC, instead of letting Oracle get the entire company. HP clearly needed something to save itself from the sinking of Intel Itanium, Oracle knew it, and it looks both Oracle & HP were pretty close to a deal that would have saved HP customers from a lot of hurt.

Thursday, December 27, 2012

Storage News: December 2012 Update


Oracle: Discusses Tape Storage...

Nanotube Non-Volitile Storage: Nantero NRAM ...

Dell Storage...

Emulex: Storage Network Vendor Buys Network Management Endace...

Red Hat Unites OS to Gluster Clustered Storage...

Advise from The Register: Cisco, Don't Buy NetApp...

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Architecture Update: The ARMs Race


Abstract:
With the explosion of ARM processors in embedded systems, ranging from phones to tablets, ARM designers are creating ever more complex processors, CPU manufacturers are creating more options for system designers, and even system designers are discussing the movement of ARM from embedded to server and desktop systems.

CPU Architecture

64 Bit ARM v8
First, let's discuss the CPU architecture updates to the ARM processing architecture. Traditionally, the ARM processor bundled a 32 bit processor. While this was more than adequate for embedded systems, this limited the application of the architecture into other spheres of computing.



At the ARM TechCon conference in Santa Clara, California, in October 2011 - the ARM v8 64 bit architecture was announced, demonstrating 64 bit extensions similar to what was done with SPARC, AMD, and later Intel CPU's.

The new ARMv8 architecture has two execution states, the AArch32 state that is compatible with prior generations of 32-bit ARM processors, and AArch64, the new 64-bit extensions. At the moment, the ARMv8 architecture has only been profiled for what ARM calls the A line of its Cortex reference designs, which means they are designated for application processing such as that done on smartphones and tablets.
The ARMv8 architecture will bring forward TrustZone virtualization (which debuted with the ARM v6) and NEON SIMD instructions, which debuted with the ARM v7 designs. The interesting thing about the ARMv8 is that it will offer both double-precision floating point math through that NEON unit.
ARM Update: Mali 450 GPU moves from 4 to 8 cores

The Registered published a short article about an ARM roadmap split:
ARM is doubling the punch of its Mali 400 graphics processors with extra cores for tablet, phone and TV makers that are not ready for combined graphics and compute chips.
The microprocessor architect has announced the Mali 450 GPU, featuring eight cores instead of four.
ARM said the 450 showed it remains committed to the 400 range, and said it is now splitting its roadmap.

ARM Designs Quad-Core 32-bit v7
In April of 2011, ARM announced their quad-core Cortex-A15 processor was scheduled to appear in smart phones or tablets in 2012-2013.
ARM's Cortex-A15, however, will up the ante with an out-of-order superscalar pipeline, 40-bit memory-addressing capabilities, floating-point and media-handling improvements, and a clock speed of up to 2.5GHz, all at power requirements said to be comparable to the company's current Cortex-A9 design.
The Cortex-A9 is the design upon which such top-end smartphone and tablet chips as Apple's A5, Nvidia's Tegra 2, and Samsung's Exynos 4210 are based. The Cortex-A15 design, meanwhile, has already been licensed by Texas Instruments and Nvidia, and Nvidia

(ARM v8 Exception Model, courtesy ARMv8 Architecture PDF)
ARM Starts Designing 64-bit
Richard Grisenthwaite, Lead Architect at ARM, provided a technology preview of the ARMv8 64 bit architecture at ARM TechCon in 2011. It was clear from the document that 32 bit ARM processors would continue to be designed and that this was merely a new line of processor design which manufacturers could leverage.

System Designers


(A Boston Viridis server, front view, no cover, courtesy, The Register)

(Boston Limited's first Viridis server, courtsy The Register)



Boston
The Register writes about U.K. IT Supplier Boston is releasing their Viridis platform, based upon their Calexeda partnership, using the Smoothstone ARM processor.
"The Viridis server is using the 1.4GHz variant of the ECX-1000 processors and plunks a 4GB DDR3 memory stick in for each node on the card. The card has two 10GE network ports and four SATA disk ports per processor... The dozen processor cards including memory burn only 300 watts."



(Dell Quad ARM Server Chassis)

(Dell Quad ARM Server Blade)

Dell
It was mentioned during the June 2012 Network Management "System Vendor: CISC, RISC, EPIC Update"  that Dell was breaking into the ARM marketplace. Each Dell blade holds 4 32-bit ARM servers. Ironically, Dell's blade server looks a lot like a far less rugged old Sun Fire B1600 blade chassis, which contained 3U high SPARC RISC SPARC blades, but each Sun blade, from a decade ago, only held single 64 bit server.

(HP Redstone ARM v7 32 bit Server, courtesy The Register)
 HP Enters the ARMs Race
In November 2011, HP released ARM RISC servers to supplement their Proliant CISC servers and Itanium LWIS processors. This was the result of "Project Moonshot".
"To make the Redstone, HP took a half-width, single-height ProLiant tray server and ripped out just about everything but the tray. In goes the passive backplane that the Calxeda EnergyCard, and HP can cram three rows of these ARM boards, with six per row, for a total of 72 server nodes, in a half-width 2U slot... That gives you 288 server nodes in a 4U rack space, or 72 servers per rack unit."
ARM CPU Manufacturers

Samsung
DRAM manufacturer, and more recently cell phone manufacturer, appears to be hiring CPU designers, possibly for the ARM CPU chips, used in Apple and their own cell phones. Various chip designers are being harvested with experience ranging from Sun Microsystems and Oracle to AMD.


Calxeda
November 2011 - Calxeda announced their 32 bit quad-core EnergyCore ARM v7 EnergyCore ECX-1000 Series CPU's.
"Calxeda has spent the past several years tweaking the 32-bit ARMv7 core to come up with its own system-on-chip (SoC) and related interconnect fabric suitable for hyperscale parallel and distributed computing where nodes have only modest memory needs."

[Applied Micro CEP Paramesh Gopi, courtesty The Register]
Applied Micro
Also in October of 2011, Applied Micro announced their X-Gene 64 bit ARM v8 processors.

(X-Gene ARMv8 CPU)
"The X-Gene chip will also include DDR3 main memory controllers, two 10 Gigabit Ethernet ports, SATA storage and PCI-Express peripheral controllers, and a power/management module – all on the same die as the cores."
"The cores will have L1 and L2 caches per core, a shared L3 cache that spans the cores, and have a target clock speed of 3GHz."
"The X-Gene chip also has on-chip CPU and I/O virtualization, just like x86, Sparc, Power, and Itanium chips do. The architecture also allows for various kinds of offload engines to be plugged in and perhaps integrated on the chip package."



(X-Gene ARM v8 Block Diagram, courtesy The Register)
The X-Gene is suposed to be ready to ship second half of 2012 - which is right about now. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (TSMC) is first etching the chips using a 40nm process, with subsequent designes in 28nm.


Nvidia
At the Las Vegas Consumer Electronics Show in April 2011, video chip processing giant Nvidea discussed phones based upon their Tegra 2 dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 chips, which bundle graphics processing, licensed the future Cortex-A15 design, and announced "Project Denver" circa 2013 - targeting desktops.
"Denver provides a choice. System builders can now choose a high-performance processor based on a RISC instruction set with modern features such as fixed-width instructions, predication, and a large general register file. These features enable advanced compiler techniques and simplify implementation, ultimately leading to higher performance and a more energy-efficient processor."
Back in September of 2010, Nvidea president and CEP Jen-Hsun Huang also discussed their "Kepler" ARM processor, due in 2011, and the "Maxwell" ARM processor due in 2013.
(Armada XP Processor, courtesy The Register)
Marvell

Chip manufacturer Marvell acquired the ARM RISC CPU business from Xscale in 2006. In 2010, Marvell announced it's quad-core 32 bit ARM v7 Armada XP processor, implemented on a 40nm process.
"...running at 1.6 GHz with a shared 2 MB L2 cache memory... The chip will include variants that support 64-bit DDR2, DDR3, and DDR3 low-voltage memory chips. For on-chip DDR3 controllers, the memory can run at to 800 MHz and ... has ECC memory scrubbing."
"The chip includes four PCI-Express 2.0 x4 interfaces and four Gigabit Ethernet controllers etched into its silicon; it has 16 SERDES lanes for implementing USB, PCI-Express, SATA, SGMII, and QSGMII ports..."
It seems 2013 could prove very interesting from Marvell.
Conclusions
It is very odd, not to see IBM producing any platforms based upon ARM, but very interesting to see IBM assisting ARM to reduce it's chip process down to 14nm, back in January of 2011. One has to wonder, at what point will IBM stop developing POWER (POWER 7+ is now about 10 months late?) or stop helping ARM produce smaller & faster processors. Up until this point, POWER was not in competition with ARM, but clearly ARM is climbing the food chain, moving to thin client desktops, cell phones, tablets, and now servers.

Apple Mac OSX, based upon BSD UNIX, and Google's Android Linux are the main OS players in the ARM arena - with Microsoft starting to produce Windows ports.

OpenSolaris port to ARM was of interest back in 2009, a code contribution made in 2009, additional work in Feb/Mar 2012 timeframe with some code, Illumos developers considering ARM in March 2012, Google "Summer of Code" ARM project idea suggested in April 2012, a grad student showing interest in April 2012, and with all the activity around ARM servers - one might hope that there will be additoinal interest in the Illumos community.

Will other OS vendors port to ARM?
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /