Jump to content
MediaWiki

Panduan artikel

From mediawiki.org
This page is a translated version of the page Article guidance and the translation is 18% complete.
Outdated translations are marked like this.

Adapt this feature!

We invite experienced editors in all language Wikipedias to adapt the sample outlines, or create them using these instructions . Creating them now ensures the Article Guidance feature will be useful for editors after deployment.
Panduan artikel
Panduan artikel bertujuan untuk memperbagus proses pembuatan artikel dan bagian di Wikipedia melalui pendekatan yang terpandu dan terdukung.
Dimulai: 2025-07
Anggota tim:
Log tunggakan: board

Panduan Artikel adalah prakarsa yang masih dalam tahap awal, dipimpin oleh Yayasan Wikimedia. Prakarsa ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan pendekatan baru yang mendukung penyunting dalam membuat kontribusi awal yang terstruktur dengan baik di Wikipedia yang selaras dengan kebijakan komunitas dan mutu konten. Tujuannya adalah untuk membantu penyunting baru dengan mudah memahami dan menerapkan praktik dan kebijakan yang ada, serta mempermudah proses memulai artikel baru. Prakarsa ini juga dimaksudkan untuk mengurangi beban kerja pengurus, sehingga mereka dapat menjaga mutu artikel dengan lebih ampuh. Terinspirasi oleh kebutuhan komunitas yang tercantum dalam daftar keinginan, perbincangan dan umpan balik dengan beberapa komunitas mengenai Gagasan pembuatan artikel untuk penyunting baru. It determines the editor's intent based on the article title and type, then provides tailored, community-adjustable guidance throughout the creation process. This includes upfront source validation, notability risk assessment, and initial content structure that provides a minimum structure to get started. By minimizing low-quality submissions, the feature aims to increase the survival rate of new pages created by editors, and reduce the workload for patrollers and administrators. In addition, the feature has been designed to work across platforms with a specific focus on lowering the barrier to contribute on mobile, where creating an article is particularly challenging. On the technical side, it is powered by Extension:ArticleGuidance.

Testing the feature

The feature is available in Simple English, Turkish and French Wikipedia as part of an A/B experiment. It is also enabled but not exposed for the A/B experiment in Bangla, Arabic, Italian, and Polish Wikipedia. Experienced contributors in these wikis are encouraged to create outlines for the feature and to provide feedback. Simple English Wikipedia has outlines for various article types, which can serve as examples with the appropriate markups. Please consider your community's editing principles if you choose to adapt any of those outlines. The feature can also be tried in Test Wikipedia following these instructions. A video below demonstrates how the feature works.

How does the Article Guidance workflow work

Article Guidance is community configurable: each Wikipedia can set its own restrictions and guidelines based on article type. This configuration is defined through outlines. An outline is a community-curated page that feeds the Article Guidance workflow. In an outline, communities can:

  • Connect the outline to a Wikidata item to define which article type it applies to
  • Set restrictions based on editor experience, source validation, and other parameters
  • Add writing tips for that topic
  • Indicate recommended and discouraged sources
  • Suggest article sections and initial content for that article type

The following Wikipedias have created outlines for their communities:

To create an outline and test it in the workflow, the workflow needs to be enabled in your wiki. If it is not yet enabled, you may still create an outline, but it will not render correctly and you will not be able to test the feature with it. Any Wikipedia community can request the feature to be enabled for experimentation purposes, without exposing it to users. You can request it on the project talk page. To learn more about outline structure and markup, or to create an outline from scratch, visit the How to create an outline page.

Feature workflow

Article guidance defines a workflow to assist contributors from the initial stages through writing the article in Visual Editor, using the provided outlines.

Title entry and topic matching

An illustration of the title entry and topic matching step in the Article guidance feature.
An illustration of the title entry and topic matching step in the Article guidance feature.

Once a contributor accesses the feature to start a new article, they are prompted to type an article title. The system queries possible topic matches from Wikidata and provides a list of primary topics and close alternatives for the contributor to confirm. This allows the feature to understand which outline to use for that specific editor's article type.

Article type selection

When a contributor cannot confirm a topic match from Wikidata from the article title, they see an option to manually choose a type from a list. If none of the listed types applies, a graceful exit lets the contributor continue without guided help or suggest a new type for community consideration.

Reference checks

Contributors are prompted to provide sources by pasting one or more URLs. Each URL is automatically checked against community-defined lists of recommended and discouraged sources, with real-time feedback. Adding sources at this stage is optional by default, but may be required depending on the article type. Making sources a requirement to move forward is something that communities can define for each article type and also adjust for different editor experience levels.

Notability risk assessment

The feature checks if a proposed article meets community-defined notability standards based on its title, type, and sources. The community can adjust how strict or loose these restrictions are. Some of the restrictions that can be configured are by topic, by editor experience, by Wikidata item match, or by cross-referencing whether an article already exists in other Wikipedias.

Community tips and guidance Contributors are shown tips from experienced editors to help them succeed in writing their article, based on the type of article they want to write. These tips are community configurable in the outlines and can range from surfacing key community policies to more practical tips on tone, style, sources, or structure.

Initial structure for the article

By clicking "Start writing", contributors access the Visual Editor with community-defined structure already in place for the chosen article type. This structure comes from what the community has defined in the outline for that article type and can help the contributor start with a minimum viable skeleton that they can edit with the relevant content for their article.

Experiment phase

The Article Guidance feature is being evaluated through an A/B test targeting junior editors creating articles on mobile. The experiment measures whether guided article creation improves the 30-day survival rate of new articles compared to the default experience, across the pilot Wikipedias. The selected entry point for this phase is red links. The experiment is configured so that a portion of junior editors are shown the Article Guidance workflow when they click a red link, while the rest follow the default article creation experience. This allows a direct comparison of article survival rates between the two groups. Early results across the pilot wikis show a statistically significant improvement in the 30-day survival rate for articles created through the guided workflow. The experiment has also provided useful data on where editors drop off in the workflow and how outline coverage affects the results, which is informing the next phase of development. For the latest results and status updates, see the status updates page.

Alasan untuk panduan artikel

The intention is to help new editors easily understand and apply the existing practices and policies, and navigate the task of starting a new article with ease. It is also meant to reduce the workload for administrators, enabling them to safeguard article quality more effectively. This initiative is inspired by community needs captured in the wishlist, discussions and feedback with some communities on the Article creation for new editors idea.

  • Membuat artikel baru itu memotivasi, tetapi juga menantang.
    Berhasil membuat artikel bermutu tinggi yang memperoleh kesetujuan merupakan pencapaian nyata bagi seorang penyunting dan faktor motivasi untuk terus berkontribusi. Namun, tanggung jawab dan pencapaian ini datang dengan tantangan dan kesulitan.
    Successfully creating a high-quality, approved article is a tangible accomplishment for an editor and a motivating factor for continued contributions. However, this responsibility and accomplishment comes with challenges and pain points.
  • Alasan khusus penolakan terhadap kontribusi milik editor baru
    Penyunting baru, khususnya, sering dihadapkan pada tugas yang berat, yaitu:
    New editors, especially, often face the daunting task of:
    • menavigasi kebijakan penyuntingan yang kompleks
    • memahami kriteria yang diharapkan oleh moderator dan komunitas Wikipedia untuk konten bermutu baik.
  • Sebagian besar waktu, mereka tidak berhasil; artikel mereka dihapus karena tidak memenuhi standar mutu, karena:
    • Kekurangan sumber
    • Sumber yang disediakan tidak dapat diverifikasi
    • Tidak ditulis secara netral
    • Tidak mengikuti struktur yang diperlukan
  • Dampak konten bermutu rendah yang dihasilkan AI
    Dengan kemajuan kecerdasan buatan (AI), beberapa kontributor menggunakan jalan pintas untuk menulis artikel yang tidak memenuhi standar komunitas kami.
    With the advancement in AI, some contributors resort to shortcuts to write articles that don't meet our community's standards.
  • Waktu yang dihabiskan pematroli untuk meninjau pengajuan yang tidak memadai
    Para pematroli menghabiskan waktu untuk meninjau dan mempertimbangkan pengajuan bermutu rendah, yang menciptakan tumpukan kerja yang berat bagi mereka.
    Patrollers spend time reviewing and deliberating on low-quality submissions, which creates a heavy backlog of work for them.
  • Kontribusi yang dibatalkan dapat menurunkan motivasi penyunting dan melelahkan pematroli.

Masalah-masalah di atas juga telah disoroti dalam daftar keinginan komunitas dan telah dibahas secara luas antara tim Pertumbuhan dan komunitas Wikipedia bahasa Inggris, serta tercermin dalam umpan balik dari berbagai komunitas.

Berpartisipasi

Begitu kita menjelajahi ruang ini, kita membutuhkan kolaborasi dengan komunitas untuk:

  • Bertukar gagasan tentang pendekatan yang perlu dipertimbangkan, dihindari, dicoba, dan diukur untuk mengevaluasi dampak proyek.
  • Mengidentifikasi jenis artikel di mana panduan dapat bermanfaat.
  • Berkolaborasi untuk membuat kerangka awal untuk jenis artikel yang dipilih.
  • Mencoba penggunaan kerangka untuk pembuatan artikel dan bagian di wiki mereka.

Silakan, bagikan pikiran Anda di halaman pembicaraan untuk membantu meningkatkan gagasan-gagasan awal dan daftarlah di halaman ini .

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /