Artificial Intelligence
AI technologies are affecting our civil liberties as never before. Ensuring that AI serves people, not power, starts with cutting through the hype . AI technologies are not magic wands—they are general-purpose tools. If we want to regulate those technologies to reduce harms without shutting down benefits, we have to focus on who uses AI, what products they use, and how they use them.
Where we see potential benefits, like improving weather forecasting, facilitating medical research, identifying systemic bias, or fostering accessibility, we work to ensure those benefits can be realized.
Where we see potential harms, we consider the practical and legal tools we already have, like pressure campaigns, privacy lawsuits, and transparency measures. If we need new tools, we should create protections tailored to the actual problem – not just to the latest outrage. For example, if policymakers are worried about AI accelerating systemic privacy violations, they should enact real and comprehensive privacy legislation that covers all corporate surveillance and data use, and close the data broker loophole to limit government surveillance.
And to keep the window open for a better future, we fight for a competitive innovation environment. For example, if we want AI models that don’t replicate existing social and political biases, we need to make enough space for new players to build them, and avoid giving today’s giants the power to block future competitors from offering us a better tool or product.
In research labs, conference rooms, courtrooms, and legislatures, people are making decisions that will determine who AI serves and how. EFF works to ensure those decisions support freedom, justice and future innovation.
EFF Related Content: Artificial Intelligence
- Governments must not adopt emerging and powerful AI technologies without also adopting strong and clear safeguards to protect Constitutional rights, EFF Senior Policy Analyst Dr. Matthew Guariglia testified today to the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection.
- Document | June 4, 2026
06-04-2024 Matthew Guariglia's prepared testimony to House subcommittee
Prepared written testimony of Electronic Frontier Foundation Senior Policy Analyst Dr. Matthew Guariglia to House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection, June 4, 2026
- Document | June 4, 2026
06-04-2024 Matthew Guariglia's opening statement to House subcommittee
Opening statement of Electronic Frontier Foundation Senior Policy Analyst Matthew Guariglia to the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection, June 4, 2026
Tech Nonprofits to Feds: Don’t Weaponize Procurement to Undermine AI Trust and Safety
While the very public fight continues between the Department of Defense and Anthropic over whether the government can punish a company for refusing to allow its technology to be used for mass surveillance, another agency of the U.S. government is quietly working to ensure that this dispute will never...
EFF v. CMS
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit to obtain records from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) about a multi-state program using AI to evaluate requests for medical care.Launched January 2026, the program known as WISeR (Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction) uses...