AI technologies are affecting our civil liberties as never before. Ensuring that AI serves people, not power, starts with cutting through the hype . AI technologies are not magic wands—they are general-purpose tools. If we want to regulate those technologies to reduce harms without shutting down benefits, we have to focus on who uses AI, what products they use, and how they use them.
Where we see potential benefits, like improving weather forecasting, facilitating medical research, identifying systemic bias, or fostering accessibility, we work to ensure those benefits can be realized.
Where we see potential harms, we consider the practical and legal tools we already have, like pressure campaigns, privacy lawsuits, and transparency measures. If we need new tools, we should create protections tailored to the actual problem—not just to the latest outrage. For example, if policymakers are worried about AI accelerating systemic privacy violations, they should enact real and comprehensive privacy legislation that covers all corporate surveillance and data use, and close the data broker loophole to limit government surveillance.
And to keep the window open for a better future, we fight for a competitive innovation environment. For example, if we want AI models that don’t replicate existing social and political biases, we need to make enough space for new players to build them, and avoid giving today’s giants the power to block future competitors from offering us a better tool or product.
In research labs, conference rooms, courtrooms, and legislatures, people are making decisions that will determine who AI serves and how. EFF works to ensure those decisions support freedom, justice and future innovation.
Artificial Intelligence Highlights
Automated Moderation Is Here to Stay—Accountability Must Keep Pace
This post is part 2 in a series about automated content moderation. Read the first post here.When whistleblower Frances Haugen leaked a set of documents from Meta in 2020, among the revelations was a jarring statistic: The company’s algorithms designed to detect terrorist content incorrectly deleted nonviolent Arabic-language...
When AI and Secure Chat Meet, Users Deserve Strong Controls Over How They Interact
Artificial Intelligence Updates
Why the So-Called AI Action Summit Falls Short
Ever since Chat-GPT’s debut, artificial intelligence (AI) has been the center of worldwide discussions on the promises and perils of new technologies. This has spawned a flurry of debates on the governance and regulation of large language models and "generative" AI, which have, among others, resulted in the Biden administration’s...
Deepening Government Use of AI and E-Government Transition in Latin America: 2024 in Review
Policies aimed at fostering digital government processes are gaining traction in Latin America, at local and regional levels. While these initiatives can streamline access to public services, it can also make them less accessible, less clear, and put people's fundamental rights at risk. As we move forward, we must emphasize...
AI and Policing: 2024 in Review
There’s no part of your life now where you can avoid the onslaught of "artificial intelligence." Whether you’re trying to search for a recipe and sifting through AI-made summaries or listening to your cousin talk about how they’ve fired their doctor and replaced them with a chatbot, it...
Fighting Automated Oppression: 2024 in Review
EFF has been sounding the alarm on algorithmic decision making (ADM) technologies for years. ADMs use data and predefined rules or models to make or support decisions, often with minimal human involvement, and in 2024, the topic has been more active than ever before, with landlords, employers, regulators, and police...